Haase M, Seinsche D, Schneider W
J Biol Stand. 1985 Apr;13(2):123-8. doi: 10.1016/s0092-1157(85)80017-2.
Sixteen lots of rabies immune globulin (RIG) and six lots of rabies immune horse serum (RIS) from different producers were examined for rabies antibody by the standard mouse neutralization test (MNT) and the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT). An equine rabies standard serum was assayed in parallel. In comparisons of RIS with this standard the MNT and RFFIT gave comparable results. In comparisons of RIG the antibody values in the MNT was two to ten times higher than that in the RFFIT in 15 out of 16 lots. The MNT and RFFIT are thus not fully comparable when measuring rabies antibodies in RIG. The choice of the titration method is obviously important in the measurement of the antibody concentration in RIG or RIS in IU against an equine rabies reference preparation. The described differences could have consequences for the use of RIG.
采用标准小鼠中和试验(MNT)和快速荧光灶抑制试验(RFFIT),对来自不同生产商的16批狂犬病免疫球蛋白(RIG)和6批狂犬病免疫马血清(RIS)进行狂犬病抗体检测。同时对一份马狂犬病标准血清进行了检测。在将RIS与该标准血清进行比较时,MNT和RFFIT得出了可比的结果。在对RIG进行比较时,16批中有15批的MNT抗体值比RFFIT高两到十倍。因此,在检测RIG中的狂犬病抗体时,MNT和RFFIT并不完全可比。在以国际单位(IU)为单位针对马狂犬病参考制剂测量RIG或RIS中的抗体浓度时,滴定方法的选择显然很重要。上述差异可能会对RIG的使用产生影响。