Department of Hematology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, ACCENT VV, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 Sep;59(9):1286-1294. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02290-7. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
The EBMT (European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Society) aims to connect patients, the scientific community, and other stakeholders to improve hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and cellular therapy outcomes. We performed a cross-sectional online survey to understand the perceptions regarding Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient Active Involvement in Research (PAIR) in over 800 stakeholders (n = 813). Patients (n = 278) and health care professionals (HCPs) (n = 351) were compared. We observed high openness for EBMT PRO collection (n = 680, 84.5% across stakeholders' groups; patients n = 256, 93.1% versus HCPs n = 273, 78.4% [p < 0.001]) and PAIR (n = 702, 87.3% across stakeholder groups; patients n = 256, 92.4% versus HCPs n = 296, 85.8% [p = 0.009]), with a significantly higher proportion of patients expressing interest compared to HCPs. Priority domains for PROs data-collection identified were the assessment of symptom experience, psychosocial and cognitive functioning. The most important issues for patients specifically were the data-collection of PROs reflecting cognitive function, the option of reporting data at home, the importance of identifying actionable targets to improve their recovery, and receiving feedback on their input when participating in research projects. Our multistakeholder approach suggests an added value to embracing patient engagement in the development of meaningful research and service design within the transplantation and cellular therapy community.
欧洲血液和骨髓移植学会(EBMT)旨在将患者、科学界和其他利益相关者联系起来,以改善造血干细胞移植和细胞治疗的效果。我们进行了一项横断面在线调查,以了解 800 多名利益相关者(n=813)对患者报告结局(PROs)和患者积极参与研究(PAIR)的看法。比较了患者(n=278)和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)(n=351)。我们观察到 EBMT PRO 收集(n=680,各利益相关者组的比例为 84.5%;患者 n=256,93.1%;HCPs n=273,78.4%[p<0.001])和 PAIR(n=702,各利益相关者组的比例为 87.3%;患者 n=256,92.4%;HCPs n=296,85.8%[p=0.009])的开放性很高,与 HCPs 相比,患者的兴趣比例明显更高。确定 PROs 数据收集的优先领域为症状体验、心理社会和认知功能的评估。对患者来说,最重要的问题是收集反映认知功能的 PROs 数据、在家报告数据的选项、确定可采取行动的目标以改善他们康复的重要性,以及在参与研究项目时收到对其投入的反馈。我们的多利益相关者方法表明,在移植和细胞治疗领域,在制定有意义的研究和服务设计方面,让患者参与具有附加价值。