• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与患者权益倡导组织的合作改善了研究招募情况。

Partnership With Patient Advocacy Organizations Improves Research Recruitment.

作者信息

Wiener Lori, Buff Kimberly, Canter Kimberly, Pariseau Emily, Scialla Michele A, Brown Victoria Sardi, Kazak Anne E

机构信息

Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Momcology, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2025 Mar;72(3):e31474. doi: 10.1002/pbc.31474. Epub 2024 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1002/pbc.31474
PMID:39676124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12403193/
Abstract

Incorporating and elevating the voices of patients and families is of utmost importance in pediatric psychosocial research. While recognized as a priority, this practice is not commonplace, and specific guidance regarding best practices and procedures is largely absent. This paper describes partnering equitably with pediatric oncology patient advocacy groups to conduct the Implementing the Standards Together: Engaging Parents and Providers in Psychosocial Care (iSTEPPP) study. The partnership was critical for all steps of the research process, including study development, refinement of the survey instrument, and recruitment procedures. We describe our overall approach, providing specific illustrative examples and highlighting opportunities for future growth.

摘要

在儿科社会心理研究中,纳入并提升患者及其家庭的声音至关重要。虽然这一做法被视为优先事项,但并不常见,而且关于最佳实践和程序的具体指导也基本缺失。本文描述了与儿科肿瘤患者权益倡导组织公平合作开展“共同实施标准:让家长和医护人员参与社会心理护理”(iSTEPPP)研究的情况。这种合作关系对研究过程的各个步骤都至关重要,包括研究设计、调查问卷的完善以及招募程序。我们描述了总体方法,提供了具体的示例,并强调了未来发展的机会。

相似文献

1
Partnership With Patient Advocacy Organizations Improves Research Recruitment.与患者权益倡导组织的合作改善了研究招募情况。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2025 Mar;72(3):e31474. doi: 10.1002/pbc.31474. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
2
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
3
Understanding the needs and experiences of young cancer patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals in the UK following childhood fertility tissue preservation (FTP): a qualitative study informed by patient and public involvement and engagement.了解英国儿童癌症患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员在儿童生育组织保存(FTP)后的需求和经历:一项由患者及公众参与和介入提供信息的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 28;15(7):e088025. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088025.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
6
Current status of African pediatric oncology education efforts aligned with the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer.与全球儿童癌症倡议保持一致的非洲儿科肿瘤学教育工作的现状
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2023 Apr;40(3):224-241. doi: 10.1080/08880018.2022.2117882. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Peer support interventions for parents and carers of children with complex needs.针对有复杂需求的儿童的父母和照顾者的同伴支持干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 20;12(12):CD010618. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010618.pub2.
9
The ultimate power play in research - partnering with patients, partnering with power.研究中的终极权力博弈——与患者合作,与权力合作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 17;11(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00745-9.
10
Medical management and intervention (using neurosurgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery) versus medical management alone for symptomatic brain cavernoma: the CARE pilot RCT.有症状的脑海绵状血管瘤采用药物治疗与干预(使用神经外科切除术或立体定向放射外科手术)对比单纯药物治疗:CARE试点随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(38):1-24. doi: 10.3310/GJRS5321.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychosocial Interventions to Relieve Traumatic Stress Symptoms in Family Caregivers of Children With Cancer: A Scoping Review.缓解癌症患儿家庭照顾者创伤后应激症状的心理社会干预措施:一项范围综述
Psychooncology. 2025 Jul;34(7):e70230. doi: 10.1002/pon.70230.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient engagement in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and cell therapy: a survey by the EBMT patient engagement task force & transplantation complications working party.患者参与造血干细胞移植和细胞治疗:EBMT 患者参与工作组和移植并发症工作组的调查。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 Sep;59(9):1286-1294. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02290-7. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
2
BIPOC experiences of (anti-)racist patient engagement in adolescent and young adult oncology research: an electronic Delphi study.BIPOC 在青少年和青年肿瘤学研究中(反)种族主义患者参与的体验:一项电子德尔菲研究。
Future Oncol. 2024 Mar;20(9):547-561. doi: 10.2217/fon-2023-0771. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
3
Toward a socially just diversity science: Using intersectional mixed methods research to center multiply marginalized Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC).
迈向社会公正的多样性科学:运用交叉混合方法研究,关注多重边缘化的黑人、原住民和有色人种(BIPOC)。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2023 Jan;29(1):34-42. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000477. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
4
Commentary: Toward Race-Conscious Research: Acknowledging Structural Racism and Its Effect on the Recruitment of Black Adolescents and Caregivers in Clinical Trials.评论:迈向种族意识研究:承认结构性种族主义及其对临床试验中招募黑人青少年和照顾者的影响。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2021 Jul 20;46(6):621-623. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsab066.
5
Family Caregiver Partnerships in Palliative Care Research Design and Implementation.姑息治疗研究设计与实施中的家庭照顾者伙伴关系
Pediatrics. 2021 Jul;148(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-049403. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
6
Disparities in Pediatric Oncology: The 21st Century Opportunity to Improve Outcomes for Children and Adolescents With Cancer.儿科肿瘤学的差异:改善癌症儿童和青少年结局的 21 世纪机遇。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2021 Jun;41:e315-e326. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_320499.
7
Pediatric Psychosocial Standards of Care in action: Research that bridges the gap from need to implementation.儿科心理社会护理标准的实践:弥合从需求到实施差距的研究。
Psychooncology. 2020 Dec;29(12):2033-2040. doi: 10.1002/pon.5505. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
8
Tools to guide the identification and implementation of care consistent with the psychosocial Standards of care.指导识别和实施符合心理社会标准的护理的工具。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 Sep;67(9):e28586. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28586. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
9
Associations Between Race/Ethnicity and US Childhood and Adolescent Cancer Survival by Treatment Amenability.种族/民族与美国儿童和青少年癌症治疗可及性与生存的关系。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 May 1;174(5):428-436. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.6074.
10
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.