• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于多学科团队的护理模式对糖尿病患者健康结局的影响:一项混合方法研究。

Impact of a multi-disciplinary team-based care model for patients living with diabetes on health outcomes: a mixed-methods study.

机构信息

Sinai Urban Health Institute, 1500 South Fairfield Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60608, USA.

Sinai Chicago, 1500 South Fairfield Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60608, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 18;24(1):746. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11062-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11062-4
PMID:38890705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11186232/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individuals facing socioeconomic hardship experience higher than average rates of chronic disease, such as diabetes, with less access to evidence-based treatment. One solution to address these inequities is a team-based care (TBC) model, defined as one in which at least two providers work collaboratively with a patient and their caregiver(s) to make healthcare decisions. This paper seeks to describe the implementation of a TBC model within a safety-net healthcare setting and determine the extent to which it can be an effective, patient-centered approach to treating individuals with diabetes.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff (n = 15) and patients (n = 18). Clinical data were extracted from the electronic medical record of patients (n = 1,599) seen at a safety-net health system in Chicago, Illinois, United States. The mixed methods study was guided by implementation science and participatory research principles. Staff interviews were 60 min and covered patient care activities, work flow, perceived patient experience, and facilitators/barriers to care coordination. Patient interviews were 60 min and covered satisfaction, attitudes about diabetes management, quality of life, and technology. Patient interviews were co-analyzed by research staff and members of a patient advisory committee. Clinical data were collected at an index visit, two years prior and at one-year follow up (n = 1,599).

RESULTS

Four themes emerged from the interviews: (1) patients perceived the TBC model to be patient centered and of high quality; (2) technology can be an innovative tool, but barriers exist; (3) diabetes management is a complex process; and (4) staff communication enhances care coordination, but misinterpreting roles reduces care coordination. From pre-enrollment to the follow-up period, we found a statistically significant increase in missed visits, decrease in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), decrease in body mass index, and decrease in the percent of patients with high blood pressure. We found that each medical visit during the follow-up period was associated with an HbA1c decrease of 0.26 points.

CONCLUSIONS

A TBC model is a patient-centered approach to providing care to patients with complex health needs, such as diabetes, patients were satisfied with the care they were receiving, and the model was associated with an improvement in clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

面临社会经济困难的个体患慢性病(如糖尿病)的比例高于平均水平,获得循证治疗的机会也较少。解决这些不平等问题的一种方法是团队式护理(TBC)模式,这种模式定义为至少有两名医护人员与患者及其护理人员共同协作,做出医疗决策。本文旨在描述 TBC 模式在医疗保障体系中的实施情况,并确定其作为一种有效、以患者为中心的治疗糖尿病患者方法的程度。

方法

对员工(n=15)和患者(n=18)进行半结构化访谈。从美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥一家医疗保障体系的电子病历中提取患者(n=1599)的临床数据。该混合方法研究以实施科学和参与式研究原则为指导。员工访谈时长为 60 分钟,涵盖患者护理活动、工作流程、感知患者体验以及护理协调的促进因素/障碍。患者访谈时长为 60 分钟,涵盖满意度、对糖尿病管理的态度、生活质量和技术。患者访谈由研究人员和患者咨询委员会成员共同进行分析。临床数据在索引就诊时、两年前和一年随访时(n=1599)收集。

结果

访谈中出现了四个主题:(1)患者认为 TBC 模式以患者为中心且质量高;(2)技术可以是一种创新工具,但存在障碍;(3)糖尿病管理是一个复杂的过程;(4)员工沟通增强了护理协调,但角色误解会降低护理协调。从预登记到随访期间,我们发现错过就诊的比例显著增加,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)下降,体重指数下降,高血压患者比例下降。我们发现,随访期间每次就诊与 HbA1c 下降 0.26 点相关。

结论

TBC 模式是为有复杂健康需求(如糖尿病)的患者提供护理的以患者为中心的方法,患者对他们所接受的护理感到满意,而且该模式与临床结果的改善相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819b/11186232/6c614ad9c998/12913_2024_11062_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819b/11186232/6c614ad9c998/12913_2024_11062_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/819b/11186232/6c614ad9c998/12913_2024_11062_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of a multi-disciplinary team-based care model for patients living with diabetes on health outcomes: a mixed-methods study.基于多学科团队的护理模式对糖尿病患者健康结局的影响:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 18;24(1):746. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11062-4.
2
Improving Diabetes Equity and Advancing Care (IDEA) to optimize team-based care at a safety-net health system for Black and Latine patients living with diabetes: study protocol for a sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial.改善糖尿病公平性和推进护理(IDEA),以优化为在一个为患有糖尿病的黑人和拉丁裔患者提供服务的保障网式医疗体系中提供以团队为基础的护理:一项针对连续、多次分配、随机试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Jul 24;25(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08346-9.
3
Implementing team-based telemedicine workflows in safety-net primary care.在安全网基层医疗中实施基于团队的远程医疗工作流程。
Am J Manag Care. 2024 May;30(6 Spec No.):SP437-SP444. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89550.
4
5
Team-based care in specialist practice: a path to improved physician experience in British Columbia.专科医师实践中的团队式照护:提升不列颠哥伦比亚省医师体验的途径。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11482-2.
6
Primary care providers' experiences caring for complex patients in primary care: a qualitative study.初级保健提供者在初级保健中照顾复杂患者的经历:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 22;17:34. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0433-z.
7
How 3 rural safety net clinics integrate care for patients: a qualitative case study.3家农村安全网诊所如何整合患者护理:一项定性案例研究
Med Care. 2014 Nov;52(11 Suppl 4):S39-47. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000191.
8
Redesigning primary care in the safety net: A qualitative analysis of team-based care implementation.重新设计安全网中的初级保健:基于团队的护理实施的定性分析。
Healthc (Amst). 2019 Mar;7(1):22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
9
10
The SUMMIT ambulatory-ICU primary care model for medically and socially complex patients in an urban federally qualified health center: study design and rationale.SUMMIT 门诊-ICU 初级保健模式用于城市联邦合格健康中心的医疗和社会复杂患者:研究设计和原理。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2018 Dec 14;13(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13722-018-0128-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Relevance of a physical activity rehabilitation care pathway based on the experience and commitment of people suffering of obesity.基于肥胖症患者经验与投入的体育活动康复护理路径的相关性
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2214. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23357-0.
2
Aged smart-care application program for promoting quality of life among older adults in the community: Study protocol of a three-arm randomized controlled trial.用于提升社区老年人生活质量的老年智能护理应用程序:一项三臂随机对照试验的研究方案
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 18;11:20552076251326218. doi: 10.1177/20552076251326218. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Harmonization of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension Blood Pressure/Hypertension Guidelines: Comparisons, Reflections, and Recommendations.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会与欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会血压/高血压指南的协调:比较、思考和建议。
Circulation. 2022 Sep 13;146(11):868-877. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.054602. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
2
Patients' reasons for missing scheduled clinic appointments and their solutions at a major urban-based academic medical center.在一家位于大城市的学术医疗中心,患者错过预约门诊的原因及解决办法。
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2020 Sep 3;10(5):426-430. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2020.1796903.
3
Determinants of implementation of continuous glucose monitoring for patients with Insulin-Treated type 2 diabetes: a national survey of primary care providers.
胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者连续血糖监测实施的决定因素:对基层医疗服务提供者的全国性调查
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Mar 8;26(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02764-7.
Co-Creation of Knowledge: A Community-Based Approach to Multilevel Dissemination of Health Information.知识共创:基于社区的多层次健康信息传播方法。
Health Promot Pract. 2021 Mar;22(2):215-223. doi: 10.1177/1524839919865228. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
4
Team-Based Care to Improve Type 2 Diabetes Management: Recommendation of the Community Preventive Services Task Force.基于团队的护理以改善2型糖尿病管理:社区预防服务工作组的建议。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Jul;57(1):e27-e29. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.02.006.
5
Team-Based Care to Improve Diabetes Management: A Community Guide Meta-analysis.基于团队的护理以改善糖尿病管理:社区指南荟萃分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Jul;57(1):e17-e26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.02.005.
6
Community-Based Participatory Research.基于社区的参与性研究
Stroke. 2019 Mar;50(3):e48-e50. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024241.
7
The Cost of Diabetes Care-An Elephant in the Room.糖尿病护理的成本——一个被忽视的重大问题。
Diabetes Care. 2018 May;41(5):929-932. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0012.
8
Participatory implementation science to increase the impact of evidence-based cancer prevention and control.参与式实施科学以提高循证癌症预防与控制的影响力。
Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Mar;29(3):363-369. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1008-1. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
9
Prevalence and Medical Costs of Chronic Diseases Among Adult Medicaid Beneficiaries.成年医疗补助受益人的慢性病患病率和医疗费用。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Dec;53(6S2):S143-S154. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.07.019.
10
Assessing citation networks for dissemination and implementation research frameworks.评估传播和实施研究框架的引文网络。
Implement Sci. 2017 Jul 28;12(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0628-2.