Suppr超能文献

基于团队的护理以改善糖尿病管理:社区指南荟萃分析。

Team-Based Care to Improve Diabetes Management: A Community Guide Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Community Guide Branch, Division of Public Health Information Dissemination, Atlanta, Georgia.

Community Guide Branch, Division of Public Health Information Dissemination, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2019 Jul;57(1):e17-e26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.02.005.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Team-based care has been increasingly used to deliver care for patients with chronic conditions, but its effectiveness for managing diabetes has not been systematically assessed.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

RCTs were identified from two sources: a high-quality, broader review comparing 11 quality improvement strategies for diabetes management (database inception to July 2010), and an updated search using the same search strategy (July 2010-October 2015).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Thirty-five studies were included in the current review; a majority focused on patients with Type 2 diabetes. Teams included patients, their primary care providers, and one or two additional healthcare professionals (most often nurses or pharmacists). Random effect meta-analysis showed that, compared with controls, team-based care was associated with greater reductions in blood glucose levels (-0.5% in HbA1c, 95% CI= -0.7, -0.3) and greater improvements in blood pressure and lipid levels. Interventions also increased the proportion of patients who reached target blood glucose, blood pressure, and lipid levels, based on American Diabetes Association guidelines available at the time. Data analysis was completed in 2016.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with Type 2 diabetes, team-based care improves blood glucose, blood pressure, and lipid levels.

摘要

背景

团队式护理已被越来越多地用于为慢性病患者提供护理,但它在管理糖尿病方面的有效性尚未得到系统评估。

证据采集

RCT 从两个来源中确定:一项高质量、更广泛的比较 11 种糖尿病管理质量改进策略的综述(数据库创建至 2010 年 7 月),以及使用相同搜索策略的更新搜索(2010 年 7 月至 2015 年 10 月)。

证据综合

当前综述纳入了 35 项研究;大多数研究都集中在 2 型糖尿病患者上。团队包括患者、他们的初级保健提供者以及一到两名额外的医疗保健专业人员(通常是护士或药剂师)。随机效应荟萃分析显示,与对照组相比,团队式护理与血糖水平的更大降低相关(HbA1c 降低 0.5%,95%CI=-0.7,-0.3),血压和血脂水平的更大改善。根据当时可用的美国糖尿病协会指南,干预措施还增加了达到目标血糖、血压和血脂水平的患者比例。数据分析于 2016 年完成。

结论

对于 2 型糖尿病患者,团队式护理可改善血糖、血压和血脂水平。

相似文献

1
Team-Based Care to Improve Diabetes Management: A Community Guide Meta-analysis.
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Jul;57(1):e17-e26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.02.005.
4
5
Multidisciplinary management of diabetic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jul;14(7):169-207. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003011.
7
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
The effect of nurse prescribers on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Feb;78:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

3
Impact of digital integrated health platforms on diabetes management: evidence from Tianjin, China.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 29;25(1):618. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12788-5.
8
1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(Supplement_1):S14-S26. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S001.
10
"The straw that broke the camel's back": An analysis of racialized women clinicians' experiences providing diabetes care.
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0305473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305473. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary care-led weight management for remission of type 2 diabetes (DiRECT): an open-label, cluster-randomised trial.
Lancet. 2018 Feb 10;391(10120):541-551. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33102-1. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
2
Evidence for Health Decision Making - Beyond Randomized, Controlled Trials.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):465-475. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1614394.
3
Patient-centered medical home initiatives expanded in 2009-13: providers, patients, and payment incentives increased.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Oct;33(10):1823-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0351.
4
Team-based care and improved blood pressure control: a community guide systematic review.
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jul;47(1):86-99. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
7
Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012.
Diabetes Care. 2013 Apr;36(4):1033-46. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2625. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
8
Nurse-community health worker team improves diabetes care in American Samoa: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jul;36(7):1947-53. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1969. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
9
Evaluation of a diabetes management program using selected HEDIS measures.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2012;52(6):e130-8. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2012.11148.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验