• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善糖尿病公平性和推进护理(IDEA),以优化为在一个为患有糖尿病的黑人和拉丁裔患者提供服务的保障网式医疗体系中提供以团队为基础的护理:一项针对连续、多次分配、随机试验的研究方案。

Improving Diabetes Equity and Advancing Care (IDEA) to optimize team-based care at a safety-net health system for Black and Latine patients living with diabetes: study protocol for a sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial.

机构信息

Sinai Urban Health Institute, Sinai Health System, 1500 South Fairfield Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60608, USA.

Parkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health, Loyola University Chicago, 2160 S 1St Ave, Maywood, IL, USA.

出版信息

Trials. 2024 Jul 24;25(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08346-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08346-9
PMID:39049044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11270937/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is the eighth leading cause of death in the USA. Inequities driven by structural racism and systemic oppression have led to racial/ethnic disparities in diabetes prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment. Diabetes-self management training (DSMT), remote glucose monitoring (RGM), and tailored support from a community health worker (CHW) have the potential to improve outcomes. This study will examine the implementation of these interventions in a safety-net healthcare setting.

METHODS

Using implementation science and racial equity principles, this study aims to (1) evaluate the appropriateness; (2) measure fidelity; and (3) compare the effectiveness of varying the combination and sequence of three interventions. An exploratory aim will measure sustainability of intervention adherence and uptake. This mixed-methods trial employs a sequential, multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) design, patient focus group discussions, and staff interviews. Eligible Black/Latine patients will be recruited using patient lists extracted from the electronic medical record system. After a detailed screening process, eligible patients will be invited to attend an in-person enrollment appointment. Informed consent will be obtained and patients will be randomized to either DSMT or RGM. At 6 months, patients will complete two assessments (diabetes empowerment and diabetes-related distress), and HbA1c values will be reviewed. "Responders" will be considered those who have an HbA1c that has improved by at least one percentage point. "Responders" remain in their first assigned study arm. "Nonresponders" will be randomized to either switch study arms or be paired with a CHW. At 6 months participants will complete two assessments again, and their HbA1c will be reviewed. Twelve patient focus groups, two for each intervention paths, will be conducted along with staff interviews.

DISCUSSION

This study is the first, to our knowledge, that seeks to fill critical gaps in our knowledge of optimal sequence and combinations of interventions to support diabetes management among Black and Latine patients receiving care at a safety-net hospital. By achieving the study aims, we will build the evidence for optimizing equitable diabetes management and ultimately reducing racial and ethnic healthcare disparities for patients living in disinvested urban settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06040463. Registered on September 7, 2023.

摘要

背景

糖尿病是美国第八大死因。结构种族主义和系统性压迫所导致的不平等现象,导致了糖尿病在患病率、诊断和治疗方面存在种族/民族差异。糖尿病自我管理培训 (DSMT)、远程血糖监测 (RGM) 和社区卫生工作者 (CHW) 的个性化支持,有可能改善结果。本研究将在一个医疗保障体系中检验这些干预措施的实施情况。

方法

本研究运用实施科学和种族公平原则,旨在:(1)评估干预措施的适宜性;(2)衡量实施的保真度;(3)比较不同组合和顺序的三种干预措施的效果。一个探索性目标将衡量干预措施坚持和采用的可持续性。这项混合方法试验采用顺序、多重分配随机试验 (SMART) 设计、患者焦点小组讨论和员工访谈。将使用从电子病历系统中提取的患者名单招募符合条件的黑人和拉丁裔患者。经过详细的筛选过程后,符合条件的患者将被邀请参加现场入组预约。获得知情同意后,患者将被随机分配到 DSMT 或 RGM 组。在 6 个月时,患者将完成两项评估(糖尿病能力和糖尿病相关困扰),并审查 HbA1c 值。“应答者”将被定义为 HbA1c 至少提高一个百分点的患者。“应答者”继续留在他们最初分配的研究组中。“非应答者”将被随机分配到更换研究组或与 CHW 配对。在 6 个月时,参与者将再次完成两项评估,并审查他们的 HbA1c 值。将进行 12 次患者焦点小组讨论,每次讨论针对两种干预路径,同时还将进行员工访谈。

讨论

据我们所知,这是第一项旨在填补我们在了解为在医疗保障医院接受治疗的黑人和拉丁裔患者提供支持的最佳干预顺序和组合方面的知识空白的研究。通过实现研究目标,我们将为优化公平的糖尿病管理提供证据,并最终为生活在投资不足的城市环境中的患者减少种族和民族医疗保健差距。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT06040463。于 2023 年 9 月 7 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2467/11270937/1eba2b887181/13063_2024_8346_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2467/11270937/387881fc92d9/13063_2024_8346_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2467/11270937/d1487cc38494/13063_2024_8346_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2467/11270937/1eba2b887181/13063_2024_8346_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2467/11270937/387881fc92d9/13063_2024_8346_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2467/11270937/d1487cc38494/13063_2024_8346_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2467/11270937/1eba2b887181/13063_2024_8346_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving Diabetes Equity and Advancing Care (IDEA) to optimize team-based care at a safety-net health system for Black and Latine patients living with diabetes: study protocol for a sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial.改善糖尿病公平性和推进护理(IDEA),以优化为在一个为患有糖尿病的黑人和拉丁裔患者提供服务的保障网式医疗体系中提供以团队为基础的护理:一项针对连续、多次分配、随机试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Jul 24;25(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08346-9.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Effect of a Coordinated Community and Chronic Care Model Team Intervention vs Usual Care on Systolic Blood Pressure in Patients With Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: The SUCCEED Randomized Clinical Trial.社区与慢性病护理模式协同团队干预与常规护理对中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者收缩压的影响:SUCCEED随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036227. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36227.
4
Participants' assessments of the effects of a community health worker intervention on their diabetes self-management and interactions with healthcare providers.参与者对社区卫生工作者干预措施对其糖尿病自我管理的影响以及与医疗保健提供者的互动的评估。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec;37(6 Suppl 1):S270-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.08.016.
5
Implementation of a multi-level community-clinical linkage intervention to improve glycemic control among south Asian patients with uncontrolled diabetes: study protocol of the DREAM initiative.实施多层次社区-临床联动干预以改善控制不佳的南亚糖尿病患者的血糖控制:DREAM 计划研究方案。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2021 Nov 23;21(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00885-5.
6
Improved self-management skills in Chinese diabetes patients through a comprehensive health literacy strategy: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial.通过全面健康素养策略提高中国糖尿病患者的自我管理技能:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Dec 20;15:498. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-498.
7
Comparing the effectiveness of Family Support for Health Action (FAM-ACT) with traditional community health worker-led interventions to improve adult diabetes management and outcomes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.比较家庭支持健康行动(FAM-ACT)与传统社区卫生工作者主导的干预措施在改善成人糖尿病管理和结局方面的效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Oct 3;23(1):841. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06764-1.
8
Impact of a community health workers-led structured program on blood glucose control among latinos with type 2 diabetes: the DIALBEST trial.由社区卫生工作者主导的结构化项目对拉丁裔2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响:DIALBEST试验
Diabetes Care. 2015 Feb;38(2):197-205. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0327. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
9
Addressing Hypertension and Diabetes through Community-Engaged Systems (ANDES) in Puno, Peru: rationale and study protocol for a hybrid type 2 effectiveness and implementation randomized controlled trial.通过秘鲁普诺社区参与系统(ANDES)解决高血压和糖尿病问题:一项混合 2 型有效性和实施随机对照试验的基本原理和研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Nov 9;25(1):747. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08586-9.
10
Digital Health and Community Health Worker Support for Diabetes Management: a Randomized Controlled Trial.数字健康和社区卫生工作者支持糖尿病管理:一项随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jan;38(1):131-137. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07639-6. Epub 2022 May 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparities in diabetes prevalence and management by race and ethnicity in the USA: defining a path forward.美国不同种族和民族之间糖尿病患病率和管理的差异:确定前进的道路。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023 Jul;11(7):509-524. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(23)00129-8. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
2
Effectiveness of diabetes self-management education (DSME) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients: Systematic literature review.糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME)对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的有效性:系统文献综述
J Public Health Res. 2021 Apr 14;10(2):2240. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2021.2240.
3
Enhancing behavioral intervention science: using community-based participatory research principles with the multiphase optimization strategy.
增强行为干预科学:运用基于社区的参与式研究原则与多阶段最优化策略。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Aug 13;11(8):1596-1605. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab032.
4
Reducing Inpatient Hypoglycemia in the General Wards Using Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring: The Glucose Telemetry System, a Randomized Clinical Trial.使用实时连续血糖监测减少普通病房住院患者低血糖症:血糖遥测系统,一项随机临床试验。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov;43(11):2736-2743. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0840. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
5
The relationship between HbA1c reduction and healthcare costs among patients with type 2 diabetes: evidence from a U.S. claims database.糖化血红蛋白降低与 2 型糖尿病患者医疗费用的关系:来自美国索赔数据库的证据。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Sep;36(9):1441-1447. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1787971. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
6
Evidence-Based Community Health Worker Program Addresses Unmet Social Needs And Generates Positive Return On Investment.基于证据的社区卫生工作者项目满足未得到满足的社会需求并产生积极的投资回报。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Feb;39(2):207-213. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00981.
7
Team-Based Care to Improve Diabetes Management: A Community Guide Meta-analysis.基于团队的护理以改善糖尿病管理:社区指南荟萃分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Jul;57(1):e17-e26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.02.005.
8
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
9
Is Theory Guiding Our Work? A Scoping Review on the Use of Implementation Theories, Frameworks, and Models to Bring Community Health Workers into Health Care Settings.理论是否指导我们的工作?一项关于将社区卫生工作者引入医疗保健环境中使用实施理论、框架和模型的范围综述。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019 Nov/Dec;25(6):571-580. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000846.
10
Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2017.2017 年美国糖尿病的经济成本。
Diabetes Care. 2018 May;41(5):917-928. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0007. Epub 2018 Mar 22.