Alghamdi Abdulrahman A, Athamh Smaher, Alzhrani Reham, Filemban Hanan
Restorative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Polymers (Basel). 2024 May 31;16(11):1558. doi: 10.3390/polym16111558.
The aim of this study is to assess the micro-tensile bond strength and the mode of failure of a bioactive hybrid self-adhesive composite (Surefil one) under various dentin conditions.
Thirty-two extracted human molar teeth were used to test the micro-tensile bond strength of Surefil one under different dentine conditions (no treatment, 37% phosphoric acid etching, and universal adhesive) in comparison with a resin-modified glass ionomer (RIVA). All restorations were light cure-bonded onto flat dentine and then sectioned into beams. Then, fractured specimens were observed under a light microscope to evaluate the mode of failure.
The Surefil one no-treatment group (NTG) exhibited the highest micro-tensile bond strength. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference observed between the Surefil one adhesive group (EAG) and the Surefil one acid etch group (EG). However, compared to other groups, the resin-modified glass ionomer (RIVA) produced the lowest results, which are statistically significant.
Surefil one offers superior bond strength values when compared to resin-modified glass ionomers. Furthermore, Surefil one requires no dentin condition and has more straightforward clinical steps.
本研究旨在评估一种生物活性混合自粘性复合材料(Surefil one)在不同牙本质条件下的微拉伸粘结强度及失效模式。
使用32颗拔除的人类磨牙,测试Surefil one在不同牙本质条件(未处理、37%磷酸酸蚀和通用粘结剂)下的微拉伸粘结强度,并与树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RIVA)进行比较。所有修复体均光固化粘结在平坦的牙本质上,然后切成梁状。然后,在光学显微镜下观察断裂的标本,以评估失效模式。
Surefil one未处理组(NTG)表现出最高的微拉伸粘结强度。此外,Surefil one粘结剂组(EAG)和Surefil one酸蚀组(EG)之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。然而,与其他组相比,树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RIVA)的结果最低,具有统计学意义。
与树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀相比,Surefil one具有更高的粘结强度值。此外,Surefil one不需要对牙本质进行预处理,临床操作步骤更简单。