Department of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60486 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Translational and Experimental Trauma Research, Department of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 May 22;25(11):5645. doi: 10.3390/ijms25115645.
In the last few years, several studies have emphasized the existence of injury-specific EV "barcodes" that could have significant importance for the precise diagnosis of different organ injuries in polytrauma patients. To expand the research potential of the NTF (network trauma research) biobank of polytraumatized patients, the NTF research group decided to further establish a biobank for EVs. However, until now, the protocols for the isolation, characterization, and storage of EVs for biobank purposes have not been conceptualized. Plasma and serum samples from healthy volunteers (n = 10) were used. Three EV isolation methods of high relevance for the work with patients' samples (ultracentrifugation, size exclusion chromatography, and immune magnetic bead-based isolation) were compared. EVs were quantified using nanoparticle tracking analysis, EV proteins, and miRNAs. The effects of different isolation solutions; the long storage of samples (up to 3 years); and the sensibility of EVs to serial freezing-thawing cycles and different storage conditions (RT, 4/-20/-80 °C, dry ice) were evaluated. The SEC isolation method was considered the most suitable for EV biobanking. We did not find any difference in the quantity of EVs between serum and plasma-EVs. The importance of particle-free PBS as an isolation solution was confirmed. Plasma that has been frozen for a long time can also be used as a source of EVs. Serial freezing-thawing cycles were found to affect the mean size of EVs but not their amount. The storage of EV samples for 5 days on dry ice significantly reduced the EV protein concentration.
在过去的几年中,有几项研究强调了损伤特异性 EV“条形码”的存在,这对于创伤患者不同器官损伤的精确诊断可能具有重要意义。为了扩大网络创伤研究(NTF)多发创伤患者生物库的研究潜力,NTF 研究小组决定进一步建立 EV 生物库。然而,到目前为止,还没有为生物库目的而隔离、表征和储存 EV 的方案。使用了来自健康志愿者(n=10)的血浆和血清样本。比较了三种与患者样本工作高度相关的 EV 分离方法(超速离心、尺寸排阻色谱和免疫磁珠分离)。使用纳米颗粒跟踪分析、EV 蛋白和 miRNA 定量 EV。评估了不同分离溶液的影响;长达 3 年的样本长期储存;以及 EV 对连续冻融循环和不同储存条件(RT、4/-20/-80°C、干冰)的敏感性。SEC 分离方法被认为最适合 EV 生物库。我们没有发现血清和血浆-EV 之间 EV 数量的差异。确认了无颗粒 PBS 作为分离溶液的重要性。冷冻时间较长的血浆也可用作 EV 的来源。发现连续的冻融循环会影响 EV 的平均尺寸,但不影响其数量。在干冰上储存 EV 样本 5 天会显著降低 EV 蛋白浓度。