Taylor S G, Applebaum E, Showel J L, Norusis M, Holinger L D, Hutchinson J C, Murthy A K, Caldarelli D D
J Clin Oncol. 1985 May;3(5):672-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1985.3.5.672.
Ninety-five patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were entered into a randomized study testing a two-week course of induction chemotherapy with methotrexate and leucovorin given prior to regional therapy. In addition, following regional therapy, patients randomized to chemotherapy were to receive similar methotrexate courses every three months for one year. Poor tolerance to this regimen after radiation and surgery led to a change in the chemotherapy following regional therapy to a combination of Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio) and cisplatin every three weeks for four cycles after the first 35 patients had been entered. Nine cases were ineligible and four lacked any follow-up data, leaving 82 analyzable cases. Using Cox regression analysis, no differences in the percentage of patients achieving disease control, the relapse-free survival, or the overall survival were identified between any treatment group. As has been described in many pilot studies of induction chemotherapy of head and neck cancer, chemotherapy responders had a more favorable disease-free survival than chemotherapy nonresponders in the total group of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. However, correcting for imbalances in the expected three year disease-free survival of these patients, based on their disease site and stage, erased this difference, indicating tumor response to this regimen of chemotherapy is not an independent factor affecting disease outcome. The division of patients into arbitrary prognostic categories based on the expected outcome for each specific tumor site and stage proved to be a useful method for balancing treatment groups, given the multiple site-stage combinations within the upper aerodigestive tract. The defined prognostic categories were the single most sensitive predictors of relapse-free and overall survival.
95例头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者进入一项随机研究,该研究测试在区域治疗前给予甲氨蝶呤和亚叶酸钙为期两周的诱导化疗疗程。此外,在区域治疗后,随机分配接受化疗的患者每三个月接受类似的甲氨蝶呤疗程,持续一年。放疗和手术后对该方案耐受性差,导致在前35例患者入组后,区域治疗后的化疗改为每三周给予阿霉素(阿德里亚实验室,俄亥俄州哥伦布市)和顺铂联合用药,共四个周期。9例不符合条件,4例缺乏任何随访数据,剩余82例可分析病例。使用Cox回归分析,未发现任何治疗组在实现疾病控制的患者百分比、无复发生存率或总生存率方面存在差异。正如在许多头颈部癌诱导化疗的初步研究中所描述的那样,在接受辅助化疗的患者总数中,化疗反应者比化疗无反应者具有更有利的无病生存率。然而,根据这些患者的疾病部位和分期,校正其预期三年无病生存率的不平衡后,这种差异消失了,这表明肿瘤对该化疗方案的反应不是影响疾病结局的独立因素。鉴于上消化道内多种部位-分期组合,根据每个特定肿瘤部位和分期的预期结果将患者分为任意预后类别,被证明是平衡治疗组的一种有用方法。所定义的预后类别是无复发生存率和总生存率的最敏感单一预测指标。