Suppr超能文献

使用质子泵抑制剂与维持性血液透析患者透析后疲劳及透析后恢复时间无关。

Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors Is Not Associated with Post-Dialysis Fatigue and Time of Recovery after Dialysis in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis.

作者信息

Bossola Maurizio, Mariani Ilaria, Monteburini Tania, Parodi Emanuele, Santarelli Stefano, Sirolli Vittorio, Cenerelli Stefano, Bonomini Mario, Tedesco Silvia, Spoliti Claudia, Di Stasio Enrico

机构信息

Servizio Emodialisi, Divisione di Nefrologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 May 30;13(11):3241. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113241.

Abstract

: To define if the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is associated with PDF prevalence and characteristics and with time of recovery after dialysis in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. : Patients were defined as experiencing PDF if they spontaneously offered this complaint when asked the open-ended question: "Do you feel fatigued after dialysis?". Time of recovery after dialysis (TIRD) was also assessed for each patient. Each patient was invited to rate the intensity, duration and frequency of PDF from 1 to 5. We defined if patients used PPI (no PPI use or PPI use), the type of used PPI, the dose of used PPI, and the duration of the use of PPI (<1 year or ≥1 year). : A total of 346 patients were studied: 259 used PPI (55 used omeprazole, 63 esomeprazole, 54 pantoprazole, 87 lansoprazole, and 7 rabeprazole) and 87 did not. Two hundred and thirty-two patients declared PDF and 114 did not. The median [min-max] TIRD was 210 min [0-1440]. The prevalence of PDF in PPI users and PPI non-users was 67% and 68%, respectively ( = 0.878). The median [min-max] TIRD did not differ significantly between PPI users and PPI non-users (180 [0-1440] and 240 [0-1440], respectively; = 0.871). Median PDF intensity, duration, frequency, and severity did not differ significantly between PPI use and no use. The prevalence of PDF was similar among the different types of PPI use and did not differ with respect to PPI non-users. Duration of PPI exposure was <1 year in 40 patients and ≥1 year in 219 patients. The prevalence of PDF did not differ between the two exposures. The correlation matrix between PPI equivalent dose, PPI treatment duration and PDF frequency, PDF characteristics, and TIRD showed whether there was statistical significance. : The use of PPI is not associated with PDF and time of recovery after dialysis in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.

摘要

目的

确定质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的使用是否与维持性血液透析患者的透析后疲劳(PDF)患病率及特征,以及透析后恢复时间相关。

方法

当患者被问到开放性问题“透析后你感到疲劳吗?”时,如果他们自发提出此抱怨,则被定义为经历PDF。还对每位患者的透析后恢复时间(TIRD)进行了评估。邀请每位患者对PDF的强度、持续时间和频率从1到5进行评分。我们确定患者是否使用PPI(未使用PPI或使用PPI)、所使用PPI的类型、所使用PPI的剂量以及PPI的使用持续时间(<1年或≥1年)。

结果

共研究了346例患者:259例使用PPI(55例使用奥美拉唑,63例使用埃索美拉唑,54例使用泮托拉唑,87例使用兰索拉唑,7例使用雷贝拉唑),87例未使用。232例患者宣称有PDF,114例没有。TIRD的中位数[最小值-最大值]为210分钟[0 - 1440]。PPI使用者和非使用者中PDF的患病率分别为67%和68%(P = 0.878)。PPI使用者和非使用者之间的TIRD中位数[最小值-最大值]无显著差异(分别为180[0 - 1440]和240[0 - 1440];P = 0.871)。PPI使用和未使用之间,PDF强度、持续时间、频率和严重程度的中位数无显著差异。不同类型PPI使用中PDF的患病率相似,与未使用PPI者无差异。40例患者PPI暴露持续时间<1年,219例患者≥1年。两种暴露情况下PDF的患病率无差异。PPI等效剂量、PPI治疗持续时间与PDF频率、PDF特征和TIRD之间的相关矩阵显示是否存在统计学意义。

结论

在维持性血液透析患者中,PPI的使用与PDF及透析后恢复时间无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b47/11172487/431e98085da3/jcm-13-03241-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验