Coudeyre Emmanuel, Pereira Bruno, Lechauve Jean-Baptiste, Girold Sebastien, Richard Ruddy, Dobija Lech, Lanhers Charlotte
Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Bâtiment Dunant-3e étage, 58 rue Montalembert, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 4;13(11):3318. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113318.
To show the superiority of eccentric versus concentric strengthening in terms of improving quadriceps strength in knee osteoarthritis (OA), a randomized controlled study was conducted to perform 12 sessions of either eccentric or concentric isokinetic muscle strengthening over 6 weeks. We recruited males and females, aged between 40 and 70 years, with predominantly unilateral femorotibial OA. Exclusion criteria were having a prosthesis, inflammatory arthritis or flare-up of OA, symptomatic patellofemoral OA, cardiovascular or pulmonary disease that could be a contraindication to the study treatment, and any pathology that could cause muscle weakness. The primary endpoint was the between-group difference in change in maximum concentric isokinetic knee extension peak torque (PT) at 60°/s on the OA side at 6 weeks. Secondary endpoints were between-group difference in change in concentric hamstring PT at 60°/s; eccentric quadriceps and hamstring PT at 30°/s; 10 m and 200 m walking speeds; pain and functional status (WOMAC score) at 6 weeks and 6 months. The sample consisted of 11 females and 27 males, with a mean age of 57.7 ± 7.52 years and a body mass index (BMI) of 25.95 ± 3.93 kg/m. Quadriceps strength increased more at 6 weeks in the concentric than the eccentric group with no statistical difference. There was a rate of 25% major adverse events in the eccentric group. Eccentric training resulted in a smaller improvement in quadriceps strength than concentric training and was associated with a high risk of muscle injury, particularly to the hamstring muscles.
为了证明在改善膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者股四头肌力量方面,离心训练相对于向心训练的优越性,我们进行了一项随机对照研究,在6周内对患者进行12节离心或向心等速肌肉强化训练。我们招募了年龄在40至70岁之间、以单侧股胫OA为主的男性和女性。排除标准包括有假体、炎性关节炎或OA发作、有症状的髌股OA、可能是研究治疗禁忌症的心血管或肺部疾病,以及任何可能导致肌肉无力的病理情况。主要终点是6周时OA侧在60°/s下最大向心等速膝关节伸展峰值扭矩(PT)变化的组间差异。次要终点包括60°/s下向心腘绳肌PT变化的组间差异;30°/s下离心股四头肌和腘绳肌PT;10米和200米步行速度;6周和6个月时的疼痛和功能状态(WOMAC评分)。样本包括11名女性和27名男性,平均年龄为57.7±7.52岁,体重指数(BMI)为25.95±3.93kg/m²。6周时,向心组的股四头肌力量增加幅度大于离心组,但无统计学差异。离心组的严重不良事件发生率为25%。与向心训练相比,离心训练导致股四头肌力量改善较小,且与肌肉损伤的高风险相关,尤其是对腘绳肌的损伤。