Tsantes Andreas G, Petrou Eleni, Tsante Konstantina A, Sokou Rozeta, Frantzeskaki Frantzeska, Domouchtsidou Aglaia, Chaldoupis Anastasios E, Fortis Sotirios P, Piovani Daniele, Nikolopoulos Georgios K, Iacovidou Nicoletta, Bonovas Stefanos, Samonis George, Tsantes Argyrios E
Laboratory of Haematology and Blood Bank Unit, "Attiko" Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Microbiology Department, "Saint Savvas" Oncology Hospital, 11522 Athens, Greece.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 30;16(11):2082. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112082.
Dysregulated hemostasis in cancer patients is associated with various clinical conditions, from thromboembolic complications to disseminated intravascular coagulation. Despite the well-established association between cancer and thromboembolic complications, the mechanisms involved are not completely elucidated. There are several predisposing factors in cancer for increased thrombus generation, such as immobilization and chemotherapy. The term cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) has been introduced to describe the close bidirectional relationship between cancer and thromboembolic events. Conventional coagulation tests (PT/aPTT) are more accurate in detecting a hypocoagulable rather than a hypercoagulable state; thus, their contribution to CAT management is limited. Traditionally, D-dimer levels have been the most common laboratory study for the evaluation of thrombotic risk. However, D-dimer levels only display a snapshot of the coagulation cascade, and they cannot provide a dynamic evaluation of evolving clot formation. Non-conventional assays, such as viscoelastic methods and microparticle formation are promising tools for the identification of patients at risk for developing CAT. Recent guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology counsel against the estimation of thrombotic risk through a single test and recommend the use of scoring systems that take into account several risk factors. The present review outlines the current insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms of CAT and provides a comprehensive review of the latest advances in the laboratory assessment of CAT and the recent guidelines for the management of patients at risk for developing thromboembolic complications.
癌症患者的止血功能失调与多种临床情况相关,从血栓栓塞并发症到弥散性血管内凝血。尽管癌症与血栓栓塞并发症之间的关联已得到充分证实,但其涉及的机制尚未完全阐明。癌症中有几个导致血栓形成增加的易感因素,如制动和化疗。“癌症相关血栓形成(CAT)”这一术语已被引入,以描述癌症与血栓栓塞事件之间密切的双向关系。传统凝血试验(PT/aPTT)在检测低凝状态而非高凝状态时更准确;因此,它们对CAT管理的贡献有限。传统上,D-二聚体水平一直是评估血栓形成风险最常用的实验室检查。然而,D-二聚体水平仅显示凝血级联反应的一个瞬间,无法对不断演变的血栓形成进行动态评估。非传统检测方法,如粘弹性方法和微粒形成,是识别有发生CAT风险患者的有前景的工具。美国临床肿瘤学会的最新指南不建议通过单一检测来评估血栓形成风险,而是建议使用考虑多种风险因素的评分系统。本综述概述了目前对CAT病理生理机制的认识,并全面回顾了CAT实验室评估的最新进展以及近期针对有发生血栓栓塞并发症风险患者的管理指南。