Wieczorek Michał, Gnat Rafał, Wolny Tomasz
Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, The Health Center in Mikołów Ltd., Waryńskiego 2, 43-190 Mikołów, Poland.
Institute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Mikołowska 72A, 40-065 Katowice, Poland.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 6;14(11):1201. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14111201.
The lack of a clear answer regarding the efficacy of physiotherapy in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) has led to attempts to critically assess the scientific studies conducted to date.
Two databases (MEDLINE via PubMed and PEDro) and Google Scholar were used to search for papers. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials, case series, and case reports that evaluate the effects of physiotherapy in the treatment of patients with CuTS.
A total of 18 studies met the eligibility criteria, capturing a total of 425 participants. Seven papers were randomized controlled trials, three more described prospective studies without a control group, and eight papers contained case reports. An analysis of the literature evaluating the effectiveness of various forms of broadly defined physiotherapy indicates that their use can have a beneficial effect in reducing many subjective and objective symptoms and improving function. In the majority of papers included in this review, their authors indicated positive therapeutic effects. Only one randomized controlled trial reported no change following therapy. It can therefore be stated that the results of the research conducted so far are optimistic. However, only 7 of the 18 papers were randomized controlled trials, while 3 were prospective studies, and 8 papers were case studies, in which 23 people with CuTS were studied.
The small number of randomized clinical trials and their considerable heterogeneity do not allow firm conclusions to be drawn about the effectiveness of physiotherapy in the conservative treatment of CuTS.
对于物理治疗在治疗肘管综合征(CuTS)中的疗效缺乏明确答案,这促使人们对迄今为止进行的科学研究进行批判性评估。
使用两个数据库(通过PubMed的MEDLINE和PEDro)以及谷歌学术搜索论文。纳入标准为评估物理治疗对CuTS患者治疗效果的随机对照试验、病例系列和病例报告。
共有18项研究符合纳入标准,共纳入425名参与者。7篇论文为随机对照试验,另外3篇描述了无对照组的前瞻性研究,8篇论文包含病例报告。对评估各种广义物理治疗有效性的文献分析表明,其使用在减轻许多主观和客观症状以及改善功能方面可能具有有益效果。在本综述纳入的大多数论文中,作者指出了积极的治疗效果。只有一项随机对照试验报告治疗后无变化。因此可以说,迄今为止进行的研究结果是乐观的。然而,18篇论文中只有7篇是随机对照试验,3篇是前瞻性研究,8篇是病例研究,其中对23名CuTS患者进行了研究。
随机临床试验数量较少且异质性较大,无法就物理治疗在CuTS保守治疗中的有效性得出确凿结论。