• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外冲击波治疗肱骨外上髁炎的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

The Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang, 641000 Sichuan Province, China.

The Department of Neonatology, The First People's Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang, 641000 Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2020 Mar 18;2020:2064781. doi: 10.1155/2020/2064781. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/2064781
PMID:32309425
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7106907/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is a common elbow problem. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) was widely used in the treatment of LE and has been shown to relieve the pain and functional impairment (loss of grip strength) caused by tennis elbow. However, the evidence with regard to whether ESWT has better clinical efficacy over other method is not clear. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of ESWT with other techniques in the treatment of LE.

METHODS

Literature searches of PubMed, OVID, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched up to 30 June, 2019. Only RCTs comparing ESWT with other methods for LE were included. Data collection and extraction, quality assessment, and data analyses were performed according to the Cochrane standards.

RESULTS

A total of 13 articles with 1035 patients were included. Of which, 501 underwent ESWT and 534 underwent other methods. The result of meta-analysis showed that pooled VAS ( = 0.0004) and grip strength ( < 0.00001) were better in the ESWT group.

CONCLUSION

Based on the existing clinical evidence, extracorporeal shock wave therapy can effectively relieve the pain and functional impairment (loss of grip strength) caused by tennis elbow, with better overall safety than several other methods. However, owing to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality RCTs are needed to support the trend towards better functional outcomes with ESWT.

摘要

背景

外侧肱骨上髁炎(LE)是一种常见的肘部问题。体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)广泛用于治疗 LE,并已被证明可缓解网球肘引起的疼痛和功能障碍(握力丧失)。然而,关于 ESWT 是否比其他方法具有更好的临床疗效的证据尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较 ESWT 与其他技术在治疗 LE 方面的有效性。

方法

对 PubMed、OVID、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 进行文献检索,检索时间截至 2019 年 6 月 30 日。仅纳入比较 ESWT 与 LE 其他方法的 RCT。根据 Cochrane 标准进行数据收集和提取、质量评估和数据分析。

结果

共纳入 13 篇文章,共 1035 例患者。其中,501 例接受 ESWT,534 例接受其他方法治疗。荟萃分析结果显示,ESWT 组的 VAS( = 0.0004)和握力( < 0.00001)均更好。

结论

根据现有临床证据,体外冲击波疗法可有效缓解网球肘引起的疼痛和功能障碍(握力丧失),总体安全性优于其他几种方法。然而,由于纳入研究的质量和数量有限,需要更多高质量的 RCT 来支持 ESWT 具有更好的功能结果的趋势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffff/7106907/eab94f607c51/BMRI2020-2064781.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffff/7106907/a474cca8d755/BMRI2020-2064781.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffff/7106907/f35a41b121bc/BMRI2020-2064781.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffff/7106907/c38146e62c94/BMRI2020-2064781.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffff/7106907/9ee352349a31/BMRI2020-2064781.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffff/7106907/59e03bf0c78c/BMRI2020-2064781.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffff/7106907/e92ded13c52e/BMRI2020-2064781.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffff/7106907/eab94f607c51/BMRI2020-2064781.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffff/7106907/a474cca8d755/BMRI2020-2064781.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffff/7106907/f35a41b121bc/BMRI2020-2064781.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffff/7106907/c38146e62c94/BMRI2020-2064781.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffff/7106907/9ee352349a31/BMRI2020-2064781.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffff/7106907/59e03bf0c78c/BMRI2020-2064781.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffff/7106907/e92ded13c52e/BMRI2020-2064781.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffff/7106907/eab94f607c51/BMRI2020-2064781.007.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.体外冲击波治疗肱骨外上髁炎的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Mar 18;2020:2064781. doi: 10.1155/2020/2064781. eCollection 2020.
2
Does the Type of Extracorporeal Shock Therapy Influence Treatment Effectiveness in Lateral Epicondylitis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.体外冲击波治疗肱骨外上髁炎的疗效是否因治疗类型而异?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Oct;478(10):2324-2339. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001246.
3
A comparative study of the efficacy of ultrasonics and extracorporeal shock wave in the treatment of tennis elbow: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.超声与体外冲击波治疗网球肘疗效的比较研究:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Aug 6;14(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1290-y.
4
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Shows Superiority Over Injections for Pain Relief and Grip Strength Recovery in Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.体外冲击波疗法在缓解外侧肱骨上髁炎疼痛和握力恢复方面优于注射治疗:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Arthroscopy. 2022 Jun;38(6):2018-2034.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.01.025. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
5
Photobiomodulation Therapy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis.光生物调节疗法与体外冲击波疗法治疗外侧上髁炎的对比研究
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2019 May;37(5):269-275. doi: 10.1089/photob.2018.4533.
6
Comparison of the efficacy of kinesiotaping and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with newly diagnosed lateral epicondylitis: A prospective randomized trial.肌内效贴布与体外冲击波疗法治疗新诊断外侧上髁炎患者的疗效比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 May;23(5):704-710. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_45_19.
7
Comparison of ultrasound and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in lateral epicondylosis.超声与体外冲击波疗法治疗肱骨外上髁炎的比较
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018 Sep;52(5):357-362. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
8
Comparison of the efficiency of peloidotherapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapies in patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.泥疗与体外冲击波疗法治疗外侧肱骨上髁炎患者的疗效比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
Int J Biometeorol. 2024 Jan;68(1):101-108. doi: 10.1007/s00484-023-02574-5. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
9
Comparative analysis of the therapeutic effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and high-intensity laser therapy in lateral epicondylitis: a randomised clinical trial.体外冲击波疗法与高强度激光疗法治疗肱骨外上髁炎的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
Rheumatol Int. 2024 Apr;44(4):593-602. doi: 10.1007/s00296-023-05525-w. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
10
Comparison of the clinical and sonographic effects of ultrasound therapy, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, and Kinesio taping in lateral epicondylitis.超声疗法、体外冲击波疗法和肌内效贴布贴扎对比治疗肱骨外上髁炎的临床和超声效果。
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Feb 26;51(1):76-83. doi: 10.3906/sag-2001-79.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of extracorporeal shockwave therapy, ultrasound therapy, and corticosteroid injections for treatment of lateral epicondylitis: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.体外冲击波疗法、超声疗法和皮质类固醇注射治疗肱骨外上髁炎的比较:一项Meta分析的汇总分析
J Orthop Traumatol. 2025 Aug 18;26(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s10195-025-00871-w.
2
From past to future: bibliometric perspective of international research activity on lateral epicondylitis.从过去到未来:肱骨外上髁炎国际研究活动的文献计量学视角
Front Surg. 2025 May 20;12:1529142. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1529142. eCollection 2025.
3
Effects of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Wound Healing in Rats.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in patients with lateral epicondylitis: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.体外冲击波疗法治疗外侧上髁炎患者的疗效:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲临床试验。
North Clin Istanb. 2018 Dec 3;5(4):314-318. doi: 10.14744/nci.2017.82435. eCollection 2018.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Different Maintenance Doses of Caffeine Citrate for Treatment of Apnea in Premature Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.不同剂量枸橼酸咖啡因维持治疗早产儿呼吸暂停的疗效和安全性的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Dec 24;2018:9061234. doi: 10.1155/2018/9061234. eCollection 2018.
3
体外冲击波疗法对大鼠伤口愈合的影响。
Cureus. 2025 May 2;17(5):e83369. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83369. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Radial versus focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy in lateral epicondylitis: Acute effects on pain, muscle strength, upper extremity function, and quality of life.桡侧与聚焦式体外冲击波疗法治疗外侧上髁炎:对疼痛、肌肉力量、上肢功能及生活质量的急性影响
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Oct 16;71(1):19-27. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2024.14060. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
[Chronic lateral epicondylopathy : What do we know about tennis elbow?].[慢性外侧上髁病:我们对网球肘了解多少?]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025 Apr;54(4):302-308. doi: 10.1007/s00132-025-04630-x. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
6
Effects on Mass Transfer in the Bone Lacunar-Canalicular System under Different Radial Extracorporeal Shock Waves.不同径向体外冲击波作用下对骨陷窝-小管系统传质的影响。
Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2025 Apr;22(3):297-308. doi: 10.1007/s13770-025-00707-y. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
7
Multimodal ultrasound assessment of the injection therapy in lateral epicondylitis: a retrospective observational study.多模态超声评估注射疗法治疗外侧上髁炎:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jan 15;26(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08283-x.
8
Focal Versus Combined Focal Plus Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: A Retrospective Study.聚焦式与聚焦加放射状联合体外冲击波疗法治疗外侧肘肌腱病:一项回顾性研究
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Oct 22;9(4):201. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040201.
9
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis Origin and Synovial Fold in Lateral Epicondylitis.桡侧腕短伸肌起点及滑膜皱襞在肱骨外上髁炎中的磁共振成像表现
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 Jul 8;6(5):654-658. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.06.005. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedic Surgery: Expanding Our Toolbox.骨科手术中的再生医学:拓展我们的工具库。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 2;16(9):e68487. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68487. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Comparison of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and wrist-extensor splint application in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a prospective randomized controlled study.
体外冲击波疗法与腕伸肌夹板应用治疗肱骨外上髁炎的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Pain Res. 2018 Aug 2;11:1459-1467. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S166679. eCollection 2018.
4
Comparison of treatment effects on lateral epicondylitis between acupuncture and extracorporeal shockwave therapy.针灸与体外冲击波疗法治疗外侧上髁炎的疗效比较。
Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2016 Nov 24;7:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2016.10.001. eCollection 2017 Jan.
5
Does Kinesiotaping improve pain and functionality in patients with newly diagnosed lateral epicondylitis?肌内效贴布疗法是否能改善新诊断的外侧肱骨上髁炎患者的疼痛和功能?
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Mar;26(3):938-945. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4691-7. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
6
Efficacy of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Lateral Epicondylosis, and Changes in the Common Extensor Tendon Stiffness with Pretherapy and Posttherapy in Real-Time Sonoelastography: A Randomized Controlled Study.桡侧体外冲击波疗法治疗肱骨外上髁炎的疗效及实时超声弹性成像中治疗前后伸肌总腱刚度的变化:一项随机对照研究
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Feb;96(2):93-100. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000547.
7
Comparison of the effectiveness of local corticosteroid injection and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with lateral epicondylitis.局部皮质类固醇注射与体外冲击波疗法治疗外侧上髁炎患者的疗效比较。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Dec;27(12):3755-8. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.3755. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
8
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs cryoultrasound therapy in the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis. One year follow up study.体外冲击波疗法与冷冻超声疗法治疗慢性外侧上髁炎的一年随访研究。
Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2015 Oct 20;5(3):167-74. doi: 10.11138/mltj/2015.5.3.167. eCollection 2015 Jul-Sep.
9
Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Is Not More Effective Than Placebo in the Management of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.桡侧体外冲击波疗法治疗肱骨外上髁炎并不比安慰剂更有效:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jul;95(7):495-506. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000407.
10
Short- to mid-term follow-up effectiveness of US-guided focal extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of elbow lateral epicondylitis.超声引导下聚焦体外冲击波疗法治疗肘部外侧上髁炎的短期至中期随访疗效
Musculoskelet Surg. 2015 Sep;99 Suppl 1:S91-7. doi: 10.1007/s12306-015-0361-4. Epub 2015 May 10.