Department of Health Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Physical Therapy, Araranguá, Brazil.
Department of Health Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Physical Therapy, Araranguá, Brazil.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Oct;28:298-310. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.07.031. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
To assess the change in temperature caused by different short wave diathermy (SWD) methods of application in different healthy tissues.
The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Science Direct, CINAHL, SciELO, PEDro, ClinicalTrials.gov, Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials and the World Health Organization ICTRP were searched (1990-April 2020).
Randomized, quasi-randomized, and single-arm controlled trials assessing temperature change after SWD application in healthy adults were included. Group analysis was done according to SWD mode and where temperature was collected, risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool and the quality of evidence using GRADE. A narrative synthesis was conducted since methodological homogeneity was not sufficient to undertake a meta-analysis.
Eleven studies were included, reporting data of 240 subjects. Regarding skin temperature change, the application that increased temperature the most was under the electrode using continuous SWD on coplanar arrangement of capacitive technique (7.9 [1.76] °C), coplanar arrangement also had the slowest temperature decay, and the lowest temperature found was through a low dose application of pulsed SWD (0.34 [0.69] °C). Regarding muscle temperature change, the application that increased temperature the most was using the inductive technique of pulsed SWD (4.58 [0.87] °C), this technique also had the slowest temperature decay, and the lowest temperature found was through ReBound shortwave diathermy (2.31 [0.87] °C).
SWD efficacy depends on setting choices. This review provides a detailed description of SWD methods of application and a quantitative data set of resulting temperature change.
评估不同健康组织中不同短波透热疗法(SWD)应用方法引起的温度变化。
Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、MEDLINE、Science Direct、CINAHL、SciELO、PEDro、ClinicalTrials.gov、巴西临床试验注册处和世界卫生组织 ICTRP 进行检索(1990 年-2020 年 4 月)。
纳入评估 SWD 应用于健康成年人后温度变化的随机、半随机和单臂对照试验。根据 SWD 模式和温度采集位置进行组分析,使用 Cochrane 工具评估偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 评估证据质量。由于方法学同质性不足,无法进行荟萃分析,因此进行了叙述性综合。
纳入了 11 项研究,报告了 240 名受试者的数据。关于皮肤温度变化,使用电容性技术平面排列连续 SWD 下电极的应用使温度升高最多(7.9 [1.76] °C),平面排列的温度下降也最慢,发现的最低温度是通过低剂量脉冲 SWD 应用(0.34 [0.69] °C)。关于肌肉温度变化,使用脉冲 SWD 感应技术的应用使温度升高最多(4.58 [0.87] °C),该技术的温度下降也最慢,发现的最低温度是通过 ReBound 短波透热疗法(2.31 [0.87] °C)。
SWD 的疗效取决于设定选择。本综述提供了 SWD 应用方法的详细描述和由此产生的温度变化的定量数据集。