Mozaffari Essy, Chandak Aastha, Chima-Melton Chidinma, Kalil Andre C, Jiang Heng, Lee EunYoung, Der-Torossian Celine, Thrun Mark, Berry Mark, Haubrich Richard, Gottlieb Robert L
Medical Affairs, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.
Evidence & Access, Certara, New York, New York, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Apr 16;11(6):ofae202. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae202. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Remdesivir has demonstrated benefit in some hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on supplemental oxygen and in nonhospitalized patients breathing room air. The durability of this benefit across time periods with different circulating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants of concern (VOC) is unknown. This comparative effectiveness study in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and not receiving supplemental oxygen at admission compared those starting remdesivir treatment in the first 2 days of admission with those receiving no remdesivir during their hospitalization across different VOC periods.
Using a large, multicenter US hospital database, in-hospital mortality rates were compared among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 but not requiring supplemental oxygen at admission between December 2020 and April 2022. Patients receiving remdesivir at hospital admission were matched 1:1 to those not receiving remdesivir during hospitalization, using propensity score matching. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess 14- and 28-day in-hospital mortality rates or discharge to hospice.
Among the 121 336 eligible patients, 58 188 remdesivir-treated patients were matched to 17 574 unique patients not receiving remdesivir. Overall, 5.4% of remdesivir-treated and 7.3% in the non-remdesivir group died within 14 days, and 8.0% and 9.8%, respectively, died within 28 days. Remdesivir treatment was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the in-hospital mortality rate compared with non-remdesivir treatment (14-day and 28-day adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence interval], 0.75 [0.68-0.83] and 0.83 [0.76-0.90], respectively). This significant mortality benefit endured across the different VOC periods.
Remdesivir initiation in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and not requiring supplemental oxygen at admission was associated with a significantly reduced in-hospital mortality rate. These findings highlight a potential survival benefit when clinicians initiated remdesivir on admission across the dominant variant eras of the evolving pandemic.
瑞德西韦已在一些接受补充氧气治疗的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)住院患者以及呼吸室内空气的非住院患者中显示出疗效。不同时期循环出现的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2变异株(VOC)对这种疗效的持续影响尚不清楚。这项针对COVID-19住院且入院时未接受补充氧气治疗的患者的比较有效性研究,比较了入院后前两天开始使用瑞德西韦治疗的患者与住院期间未接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者在不同VOC时期的情况。
利用美国一个大型多中心医院数据库,比较了2020年12月至2022年4月期间因COVID-19住院但入院时不需要补充氧气的患者的院内死亡率。采用倾向评分匹配法,将入院时接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者与住院期间未接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者按1:1进行匹配。使用Cox比例风险模型评估14天和28天的院内死亡率或转至临终关怀机构的情况。
在121336名符合条件的患者中,58188名接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者与17574名未接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者进行了匹配。总体而言,接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者中有5.4%在14天内死亡,非瑞德西韦组为7.3%;在28天内死亡的比例分别为8.0%和9.8%。与未接受瑞德西韦治疗相比,瑞德西韦治疗与院内死亡率的显著降低相关(14天和28天调整后的风险比[95%置信区间]分别为0.75[0.68-0.83]和0.83[0.76-0.90])。这种显著的死亡率获益在不同的VOC时期均持续存在。
对于因COVID-19住院且入院时不需要补充氧气的患者,开始使用瑞德西韦治疗与院内死亡率显著降低相关。这些发现凸显了在不断演变的疫情中,临床医生在入院时开始使用瑞德西韦治疗可能带来的生存获益。