Suppr超能文献

瑞德西韦联合地塞米松与单独使用地塞米松治疗COVID-19住院患者相比,死亡风险更低。

Lower Mortality Risk Associated With Remdesivir + Dexamethasone Versus Dexamethasone Alone for the Treatment of Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19.

作者信息

Mozaffari Essy, Chandak Aastha, Gottlieb Robert L, Chima-Melton Chidinma, Berry Mark, Oppelt Thomas, Okulicz Jason F, Amin Alpesh N, Welte Tobias, Sax Paul E, Kalil Andre C

机构信息

Global Medical Affairs, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.

Evidence & Access, Certara, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 5;80(1):63-71. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae477.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment guidelines were developed early in the pandemic when much about coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was unknown. Given the evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), real-world data can provide clinicians with updated information. The objective of this analysis was to assess mortality risk in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 during the Omicron period receiving remdesivir + dexamethasone versus dexamethasone alone.

METHODS

A large, multicenter US hospital database was used to identify adult patients hospitalized with a primary discharge diagnosis of COVID-19 flagged as "present-on-admission" and treated with remdesivir + dexamethasone or dexamethasone alone between December 2021 and April 2023. Patients were matched using 1:1 propensity score matching and stratified by baseline oxygen requirements. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess time to 14- and 28-day in-hospital all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 33 037 patients were matched, with most patients ≥65 years old (72%), White (78%), and non-Hispanic (84%). Remdesivir + dexamethasone was associated with lower mortality risk versus dexamethasone alone across all baseline oxygen requirements at 14-days (no supplemental oxygen charges: adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 0.79 [.72-.87], low flow oxygen: 0.70 [.64-.77], high flow oxygen/non-invasive ventilation: 0.69 [.62-.76], invasive mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygen (IMV/ECMO): 0.78 [.64-.94]), with similar results at 28-days.

CONCLUSIONS

Remdesivir + dexamethasone was associated with a significant reduction in 14- and 28-day mortality compared to dexamethasone alone in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 across all levels of baseline respiratory support, including IMV/ECMO. However, the use of remdesivir + dexamethasone still has low clinical practice uptake. In addition, these data suggest a need to update the existing guidelines.

摘要

背景

在新冠疫情早期,当2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的许多情况尚不明时,治疗指南就已制定。鉴于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的演变,真实世界的数据可为临床医生提供最新信息。本分析的目的是评估在奥密克戎时期因COVID-19住院的患者接受瑞德西韦+地塞米松与单独使用地塞米松相比的死亡风险。

方法

使用一个大型的美国多中心医院数据库,以识别2021年12月至2023年4月期间因COVID-19住院且主要出院诊断标记为“入院时存在”,并接受瑞德西韦+地塞米松或单独使用地塞米松治疗的成年患者。使用1:1倾向评分匹配对患者进行匹配,并根据基线氧需求进行分层。使用Cox比例风险模型评估14天和28天院内全因死亡率的时间。

结果

共匹配了33037名患者,大多数患者年龄≥65岁(72%),为白人(78%),非西班牙裔(84%)。在所有基线氧需求水平下,14天时瑞德西韦+地塞米松与单独使用地塞米松相比,死亡风险较低(无需补充氧气:调整后风险比[95%置信区间{CI}]:0.79[0.72-0.87],低流量吸氧:0.70[0.64-0.77],高流量吸氧/无创通气:0.69[0.62-0.76],有创机械通气/体外膜肺氧合(IMV/ECMO):0.78[0.64-0.94]),28天时结果相似。

结论

在因COVID-19住院的患者中,无论基线呼吸支持水平如何,包括IMV/ECMO,与单独使用地塞米松相比,瑞德西韦+地塞米松可显著降低14天和28天的死亡率。然而,瑞德西韦+地塞米松在临床实践中的应用率仍然较低。此外,这些数据表明需要更新现有指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908c/11797391/74accf141dde/ciae477f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验