Amerio Pietro, Michel Matthias, Goerttler Stephan, Peters Megan A K, Cleeremans Axel
Consciousness, Cognition & Computation Group, Center for Research in Cognition & Neurosciences, ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de Bruxelles.
Center for Mind, Brain and Consciousness, New York University.
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Jun 4;8:739-765. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00145. eCollection 2024.
The comparison between conscious and unconscious perception is a cornerstone of consciousness science. However, most studies reporting above-chance discrimination of unseen stimuli do not control for criterion biases when assessing awareness. We tested whether observers can discriminate subjectively invisible offsets of Vernier stimuli when visibility is probed using a bias-free task. To reduce visibility, stimuli were either backward masked or presented for very brief durations (1-3 milliseconds) using a modern-day Tachistoscope. We found some behavioral indicators of perception without awareness, and yet, no conclusive evidence thereof. To seek more decisive proof, we simulated a series of Bayesian observer models, including some that produce visibility judgements alongside type-1 judgements. Our data are best accounted for by observers with slightly suboptimal conscious access to sensory evidence. Overall, the stimuli and visibility manipulations employed here induced mild instances of blindsight-like behavior, making them attractive candidates for future investigation of this phenomenon.
有意识知觉与无意识知觉之间的比较是意识科学的基石。然而,大多数报告对未被看到的刺激进行高于机会水平辨别力的研究在评估意识时并未控制标准偏差。我们测试了在使用无偏差任务探测能见度时,观察者是否能够辨别主观上不可见的游标刺激偏移。为了降低能见度,刺激要么被逆向掩蔽,要么使用现代速示器呈现极短的持续时间(1 - 3毫秒)。我们发现了一些无意识知觉的行为指标,然而,尚无确凿证据。为了寻求更具决定性的证据,我们模拟了一系列贝叶斯观察者模型,包括一些在产生1型判断的同时进行能见度判断的模型。我们的数据最能由对感官证据的有意识获取略次优水平的观察者来解释。总体而言,这里采用的刺激和能见度操纵引发了类似盲视行为的轻微实例,使其成为未来对该现象进行研究的有吸引力的候选对象。