Suppr超能文献

时分复用(TDM)序列消除了T2估计和弛豫扩散测量中的偏差。

Time-division multiplexing (TDM) sequence removes bias in T2 estimation and relaxation-diffusion measurements.

作者信息

Liu Qiang, Gagoski Borjan, Shaik Imam Ahmed, Westin Carl-Fredrik, Wilde Elisabeth A, Schneider Walter, Bilgic Berkin, Grissom William, Nielsen Jon-Fredrik, Zaitsev Maxim, Rathi Yogesh, Ning Lipeng

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 3:2024.06.03.597138. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.03.597138.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the performance of multi-echo (ME) and time-division multiplexing (TDM) sequences for accelerated relaxation-diffusion MRI (rdMRI) acquisition and to examine their reliability in estimating accurate rdMRI microstructure measures.

METHOD

The ME, TDM, and the reference single-echo (SE) sequences with six echo times (TE) were implemented using Pulseq with single-band (SB-) and multi-band 2 (MB2-) acceleration factors. On a diffusion phantom, the image intensities of the three sequences were compared, and the differences were quantified using the normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE). For the in-vivo brain scan, besides the image intensity comparison and T2-estimates, different methods were used to assess sequence-related effects on microstructure estimation, including the relaxation diffusion imaging moment (REDIM) and the maximum-entropy relaxation diffusion distribution (MaxEnt-RDD).

RESULTS

TDM performance was similar to the gold standard SE acquisition, whereas ME showed greater biases (3-4× larger NRMSEs for phantom, 2× for in-vivo). T2 values obtained from TDM closely matched SE, whereas ME sequences underestimated the T2 relaxation time. TDM provided similar diffusion and relaxation parameters as SE using REDIM, whereas SB-ME exhibited a 60% larger bias in the map and on average 3.5× larger bias in the covariance between relaxation-diffusion coefficients.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis demonstrates that TDM provides a more accurate estimation of relaxation-diffusion measurements while accelerating the acquisitions by a factor of 2 to 3.

摘要

目的

比较多回波(ME)和时分复用(TDM)序列在加速弛豫扩散磁共振成像(rdMRI)采集中的性能,并检验它们在估计准确的rdMRI微观结构测量值方面的可靠性。

方法

使用Pulseq以单带(SB-)和多带2(MB2-)加速因子实现ME、TDM以及具有六个回波时间(TE)的参考单回波(SE)序列。在扩散模型上,比较三个序列的图像强度,并使用归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)对差异进行量化。对于体内脑部扫描,除了图像强度比较和T2估计外,还使用不同方法评估序列对微观结构估计的相关影响,包括弛豫扩散成像矩(REDIM)和最大熵弛豫扩散分布(MaxEnt-RDD)。

结果

TDM性能与金标准SE采集相似,而ME显示出更大的偏差(模型的NRMSE大3-4倍,体内大2倍)。从TDM获得的T2值与SE紧密匹配,而ME序列低估了T2弛豫时间。使用REDIM时,TDM提供的扩散和弛豫参数与SE相似,而SB-ME在图中的偏差大60%,在弛豫扩散系数协方差方面平均偏差大3.5倍。

结论

我们的分析表明,TDM在将采集加速2至3倍的同时,能更准确地估计弛豫扩散测量值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbfc/11185580/817b47094e3e/nihpp-2024.06.03.597138v1-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验