Liu Qiang, Gagoski Borjan, Shaik Imam Ahmed, Westin Carl-Fredrik, Wilde Elisabeth A, Schneider Walter, Bilgic Berkin, Grissom William, Nielsen Jon-Fredrik, Zaitsev Maxim, Rathi Yogesh, Ning Lipeng
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 3:2024.06.03.597138. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.03.597138.
To compare the performance of multi-echo (ME) and time-division multiplexing (TDM) sequences for accelerated relaxation-diffusion MRI (rdMRI) acquisition and to examine their reliability in estimating accurate rdMRI microstructure measures.
The ME, TDM, and the reference single-echo (SE) sequences with six echo times (TE) were implemented using Pulseq with single-band (SB-) and multi-band 2 (MB2-) acceleration factors. On a diffusion phantom, the image intensities of the three sequences were compared, and the differences were quantified using the normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE). For the in-vivo brain scan, besides the image intensity comparison and T2-estimates, different methods were used to assess sequence-related effects on microstructure estimation, including the relaxation diffusion imaging moment (REDIM) and the maximum-entropy relaxation diffusion distribution (MaxEnt-RDD).
TDM performance was similar to the gold standard SE acquisition, whereas ME showed greater biases (3-4× larger NRMSEs for phantom, 2× for in-vivo). T2 values obtained from TDM closely matched SE, whereas ME sequences underestimated the T2 relaxation time. TDM provided similar diffusion and relaxation parameters as SE using REDIM, whereas SB-ME exhibited a 60% larger bias in the
Our analysis demonstrates that TDM provides a more accurate estimation of relaxation-diffusion measurements while accelerating the acquisitions by a factor of 2 to 3.
比较多回波(ME)和时分复用(TDM)序列在加速弛豫扩散磁共振成像(rdMRI)采集中的性能,并检验它们在估计准确的rdMRI微观结构测量值方面的可靠性。
使用Pulseq以单带(SB-)和多带2(MB2-)加速因子实现ME、TDM以及具有六个回波时间(TE)的参考单回波(SE)序列。在扩散模型上,比较三个序列的图像强度,并使用归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)对差异进行量化。对于体内脑部扫描,除了图像强度比较和T2估计外,还使用不同方法评估序列对微观结构估计的相关影响,包括弛豫扩散成像矩(REDIM)和最大熵弛豫扩散分布(MaxEnt-RDD)。
TDM性能与金标准SE采集相似,而ME显示出更大的偏差(模型的NRMSE大3-4倍,体内大2倍)。从TDM获得的T2值与SE紧密匹配,而ME序列低估了T2弛豫时间。使用REDIM时,TDM提供的扩散和弛豫参数与SE相似,而SB-ME在
我们的分析表明,TDM在将采集加速2至3倍的同时,能更准确地估计弛豫扩散测量值。