研究丙二醛作为氧化应激生物标志物与犬乳腺腺癌恶性程度的关系。
Studies on the association of malondialdehyde as a biomarker for oxidative stress and degree of malignancy in dogs with mammary adenocarcinomas.
机构信息
Veterinary Faculty, Clinic of Small Animal Surgery and Reproduction, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Animal Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
出版信息
Vet Med Sci. 2024 Jul;10(4):e1496. doi: 10.1002/vms3.1496.
BACKGROUND
Mammary adenocarcinomas are one of the most common tumour diseases in bitches. The relationship between oxidative stress and the degree of malignancy of the tumour has not been sufficiently researched in veterinary medicine.
OBJECTIVES
The main objective was to investigate the potential role of MDA as a practice-relevant biomarker for the assessment of systemic oxidative stress and to determine whether this parameter can indicate the malignancy grade of a mammary adenocarcinoma.
METHODS
In the present pilot study, MDA plasma concentrations were analysed in 55 bitches with (n = 28) and without (n027) malignant adenocarcinomas of the mammary gland using two different measurement methods and the relationship to tumour size was investigated.
RESULTS
The mean MDA concentration measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was 289 ng/mL (range 365-634 ng/mL) in dogs with grade 1 adenocarcinoma (n = 13), 288.5 ng/mL (range 85-752 ng/mL) in dogs with grade 2 adenocarcinoma (n = 10), 332 ng/mL (range 239-947 ng/mL) in dogs with grade 3 (n = 5) adenocarcinoma and 293 ng/mL (range 175-549 ng/mL) in dogs without a mammary tumour (n = 27). When MDA was measured by HPLC, the average MDA concentration in the study group (n = 11) was 0.24 µmol/L (range 0.16-0.37) and that of the control group (n = 15) was 0.27 µmol/L (range 0.16-1.62). Thus, there were no significant differences between the study group with malignant adenocarcinomas and the control group in both examination methods (p > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no correlation between the MDA concentrations and the approximate volume of the mammary tumour.
CONCLUSION
The results highlight the challenges of providing a prognosis for the malignancy of a mammary adenocarcinoma based on MDA concentrations in plasma using ELISA or HPLC. As a result, histopathological examination remains the gold standard for diagnosing and differentiating adenocarcinomas of the mammary gland.
背景
乳腺腺癌是犬类最常见的肿瘤疾病之一。兽医领域尚未充分研究氧化应激与肿瘤恶性程度之间的关系。
目的
本主要目的是研究 MDA 作为评估系统性氧化应激的实用相关生物标志物的潜在作用,并确定该参数是否可以指示乳腺腺癌的恶性程度。
方法
在本初步研究中,使用两种不同的测量方法分析了 55 只患有(n=28)和不患有(n=27)乳腺恶性腺癌的犬的 MDA 血浆浓度,并研究了其与肿瘤大小的关系。
结果
通过酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)测量的 MDA 浓度平均值在患有 1 级腺癌的犬中为 289ng/mL(范围为 365-634ng/mL)(n=13),在患有 2 级腺癌的犬中为 288.5ng/mL(范围为 85-752ng/mL)(n=10),在患有 3 级(n=5)腺癌的犬中为 332ng/mL(范围为 239-947ng/mL),在没有乳腺肿瘤的犬中为 293ng/mL(范围为 175-549ng/mL)(n=27)。当使用 HPLC 测量 MDA 时,研究组(n=11)的平均 MDA 浓度为 0.24µmol/L(范围为 0.16-0.37),对照组(n=15)的平均 MDA 浓度为 0.27µmol/L(范围为 0.16-1.62)。因此,两种检查方法在患有恶性腺癌的研究组与对照组之间均无显著差异(p>0.05)。此外,MDA 浓度与乳腺肿瘤的近似体积之间也没有相关性。
结论
结果强调了基于 ELISA 或 HPLC 测量的 MDA 浓度,为乳腺腺癌的恶性程度提供预后的挑战。因此,组织病理学检查仍然是诊断和区分乳腺腺癌的金标准。