Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024 Aug;35(8):1636-1644. doi: 10.1111/jce.16338. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
The association between paced LVAT and cardiac structure and function at baseline, as well as whether longer LVAT is associated with worse cardiac reverse remodeling in patients with heart failure (HF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) has not been well investigated. The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between paced LVAT and baseline echocardiographic parameters and cardiac reverse remodeling at follow-up.
Patients with HF and LBBB receiving successful left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) from June 2018 to April 2023 were enrolled and grouped based on paced LVAT. NT-proBNP and echocardiographic parameters were recorded during routine follow-up. The relationships between paced LVAT and echocardiographic parameters at baseline and follow-up were analyzed.
Eighty-three patients were enrolled (48 males, aged 65 ± 9.8, mean LVEF 32.1 ± 7.5%, mean LVEDD 63.0 ± 8.5 mm, median NT-proBNP 1057[513-3158] pg/mL). The paced QRSd was significantly decreased (177 ± 17.9 vs. 134 ± 18.5, p < .001) and median paced LVAT was 80[72-88] ms. After a median follow-up of 12[9-29] months, LVEF increased to 52.1 ± 11.2%, LVEDD decreased to 52.6 ± 8.8 mm, and NT-proBNP decreased to 215[73-532]pg/mL. Patients were grouped based on paced LVAT: LVAT < 80 ms (n = 39); 80 ≤ LVAT < 90 ms (n = 24); LVAT ≥ 90 ms (n = 20). Patients with longer LVAT had larger LVEDD and lower LVEF (LVEDD: p < .001; LVEF: p = .001). The difference in LVEF was statistically significant among groups (p < .001) and patients with longer LVAT had lower LVEF, while the difference in LVEF was not seen (p = .090). There was no significant correlation between ΔLVEF ΔLVEF and LVAT respectively (ΔLVEF: p = .261, r = -.126; ΔLVEF: p = .085, r = .218).
Long paced LVAT was associated with worse echocardiographic parameters at baseline, but did not affect the cardiac reverse remodeling in patients with HF and LBBB. Those with longer LVAT required longer time to recover.
pacedLVAT 与心力衰竭(HF)和左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)患者的基线心脏结构和功能之间的关系,以及 pacedLVAT 是否更长与心脏逆向重构的恶化有关,尚未得到很好的研究。本研究的目的是探讨 pacedLVAT 与基线超声心动图参数和随访时心脏逆向重构之间的关系。
2018 年 6 月至 2023 年 4 月期间,我们招募了接受左束支起搏(LBBP)成功的 HF 和 LBBB 患者,并根据 pacedLVAT 进行分组。在常规随访期间记录 NT-proBNP 和超声心动图参数。分析 pacedLVAT 与基线和随访时超声心动图参数之间的关系。
共纳入 83 例患者(48 名男性,年龄 65±9.8 岁,平均 LVEF 32.1±7.5%,平均 LVEDD 63.0±8.5mm,中位数 NT-proBNP 1057[513-3158]pg/ml)。 pacedQRSd 明显降低(177±17.9 比 134±18.5,p<0.001),中位数 pacedLVAT 为 80[72-88]ms。中位随访 12[9-29]个月后,LVEF 增加至 52.1±11.2%,LVEDD 减少至 52.6±8.8mm,NT-proBNP 减少至 215[73-532]pg/ml。根据 pacedLVAT 将患者分为三组:LVAT<80ms(n=39);80≤LVAT<90ms(n=24);LVAT≥90ms(n=20)。 LVAT 较长的患者 LVEDD 较大,LVEF 较低(LVEDD:p<0.001;LVEF:p=0.001)。各组间 LVEF 的差异有统计学意义(p<0.001),LVAT 较长的患者 LVEF 较低,而 LVEF 的差异未见(p=0.090)。 ΔLVEF 和 ΔLVEF 与 LVAT 之间无明显相关性(ΔLVEF:p=0.261,r=-0.126;ΔLVEF:p=0.085,r=-0.218)。
pacedLVAT 较长与基线时心脏超声心动图参数较差有关,但不影响 HF 和 LBBB 患者的心脏逆向重构。 pacedLVAT 较长的患者需要更长的时间来恢复。