Reproductive Medicine Center, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, China.
Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hangzhou 310016, China.
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Jun 25;53(3):368-375. doi: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0078.
To compare the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) with fresh or frozen embryos in spouses of patients with severely low sperm concentration and motility.
A total of 2300 patients whose spouses have severely low sperm concentration and motility underwent IVT-ET in the Reproduction Medicine Center, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from April 2018 to April 2022. After applying the propensity score matching (PSM), 473 fresh embryo transferred cycles and 473 frozen embryo transferred cycles were selected for the study, and the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups.
There were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes and neonatal outcomes between fresh and frozen embryo groups (all >0.05). In the stratification analysis, the number of retrieved oocytes in the fresh good-quality embryo transfer group was significantly increased compared with the fresh poor-quality embryo group (<0.05), but the very early pregnancy loss rates were similar between the two groups (>0.05), while the rate in fresh good-quality embryo transfer group was significantly higher than that in the frozen good-quality embryo transfer group (<0.05). Among different age groups of women, the number of retrieved oocytes and the level of estrogen in the fresh embryo transfer group was significantly higher in the 20 to <30 years old group than that in the 30 to <35 years old group (both <0.05), but the clinical pregnancy rate was lower in the 20 to <30 years old group than that in the 30 to <35 years old group (>0.05). Additionally, the very early pregnancy loss was significantly increased in the fresh embryo group compared with the frozen embryo group in the 20 to <30 years age group (<0.05)
There were no significant differences in pregnancy and neonatal outcomes between fresh and frozen embryo transfer in spouses of patients with severely low sperm concentration and motility undergoing IVF-ET. Due to the shorter transfer times, less embryo freezing damage and reduced costs, fresh embryo transfer can be considered as the first choice. However, it is not necessary to pursue fresh embryo transfer if maternal oestrogen levels are too high and there is a tendency of overstimulation.
比较严重少弱精子症患者配偶行体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)时新鲜胚胎与冷冻胚胎移植的妊娠及新生儿结局。
选择 2018 年 4 月至 2022 年 4 月在浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院生殖医学中心行 IVT-ET 的严重少弱精子症患者配偶 2300 例,应用倾向性评分匹配(PSM)法,选择新鲜胚胎移植组 473 例和冷冻胚胎移植组 473 例,比较两组妊娠及新生儿结局。
新鲜胚胎组与冷冻胚胎组的妊娠结局及新生儿结局比较,差异均无统计学意义(均>0.05)。在亚组分析中,新鲜优质胚胎移植组获卵数明显多于新鲜非优质胚胎移植组(<0.05),但两组早期流产率相似(>0.05),且新鲜优质胚胎移植组明显高于冷冻优质胚胎移植组(<0.05)。在不同年龄组中,新鲜胚胎移植组的 20 岁<年龄<30 岁组较 30 岁<年龄<35 岁组获卵数、雌激素水平均明显升高(均<0.05),但 20 岁<年龄<30 岁组的临床妊娠率明显低于 30 岁<年龄<35 岁组(>0.05)。此外,20 岁<年龄<30 岁组新鲜胚胎组的早期流产率明显高于冷冻胚胎组(<0.05)。
严重少弱精子症患者配偶行 IVF-ET 时,新鲜胚胎与冷冻胚胎移植的妊娠及新生儿结局差异无统计学意义。由于新鲜胚胎移植的移植时间更短、胚胎冷冻损伤更小、费用更低,可考虑作为首选。但如果母体雌激素水平过高,有过度刺激倾向,也没有必要追求新鲜胚胎移植。