Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
The Schiller Institute for Integrated Science and Society, Boston College, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jan;64(1):e12775. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12775. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
Individuals and governments often fail to take action to address climate change owing largely to widespread politicization of the issue and related discourse. In response to recent appeals for non-partisan approaches to pro-environmentalism, we propose that highlighting one's responsibility to future generations (RFG) could offer promise across the political spectrum. We argue that RFG may be effective because it is widely endorsed, uncorrelated with demographic indicators and less tied to political ideology compared to other forms of responsibility, such as personal responsibility for climate change mitigation. Across six main and seven supplementary studies (N = 161,633), we provide evidence for these claims. RFG is not only widely endorsed across countries and demographic groups but it also significantly predicts various measures of pro-environmental behaviour, both in correlational and pre-registered experimental contexts. These findings confirm established effects, reconcile inconsistencies and suggest prioritizing intergenerational responsibility may effectively reshape climate change narratives for the most resistant parties.
个人和政府往往未能采取行动应对气候变化,这主要是由于该问题的广泛政治化和相关言论。针对最近呼吁采取无党派立场的环保主义方法,我们提出,强调对后代的责任(RFG)可能在整个政治领域都有希望。我们认为,RFG 可能是有效的,因为它得到了广泛的认可,与人口统计指标无关,并且与其他形式的责任(如个人对气候变化缓解的责任)相比,与政治意识形态的联系较少。在六项主要研究和七项补充研究中(N=161633),我们提供了这些主张的证据。RFG 不仅在各国和人口群体中得到广泛认可,而且在相关和预先注册的实验背景下,它还显著预测了各种环保行为措施。这些发现证实了既定的影响,调和了不一致之处,并表明优先考虑代际责任可能会有效地为最顽固的各方重塑气候变化叙事。