Department of Psychology, New York University.
Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University.
Psychol Sci. 2024 Aug;35(8):933-947. doi: 10.1177/09567976241256961. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
Across development, people tend to demonstrate a preference for contexts in which they have the opportunity to make choices. However, it is not clear how children, adolescents, and adults learn to calibrate this preference based on the costs and benefits of agentic choice. Here, in both a primary, in-person, reinforcement-learning experiment ( = 92; age range = 10-25 years) and a preregistered online replication study ( = 150; age range = 8-25 years), we found that participants overvalued agentic choice but also calibrated their agency decisions to the reward structure of the environment, increasingly selecting agentic choice when choice had greater instrumental value. Regression analyses and computational modeling of participant choices revealed that participants' bias toward agentic choice-reflecting its intrinsic value-remained consistent across age, whereas sensitivity to the instrumental value of agentic choice increased from childhood to early adulthood.
在整个发展过程中,人们往往倾向于选择有机会做出选择的环境。然而,目前尚不清楚儿童、青少年和成年人如何根据自主选择的成本和收益来调整这种偏好。在这里,我们在一个初级的、面对面的强化学习实验(n=92;年龄范围为 10-25 岁)和一个预先注册的在线复制研究(n=150;年龄范围为 8-25 岁)中都发现,参与者高估了自主选择的价值,但也根据环境的奖励结构来调整他们的自主权决策,当选择具有更大的工具价值时,他们越来越多地选择自主选择。对参与者选择的回归分析和计算建模表明,参与者对自主选择的偏见——反映了其内在价值——在整个年龄段都保持一致,而对自主选择的工具价值的敏感性则从儿童期到成年早期逐渐增加。