A retrospective, comparative analysis of A&E attendance paserns in Irish Traveller versus non-Traveller general practice patients.

BACKGROUND

Very little is known about Gypsy, Roma, and Traveller health, or access to and utilisation of health care. They are not coded in NHS data systems and there are multiple barriers including illiteracy, digital exclusion, and discrimination.

AIM

To gain rare insight into Irish Traveller patients' emergency healthcare utilisation and outcomes.

METHOD

A retrospective general practice review of A&E attendances was performed from January to December 2017, comparing Travellers with the rest of the practice patient population. A search was done for all A&E attendance letters and related admissions. Blind review of the diagnosis and management were assessed by two reviewers for appropriateness of attendance at A&E. The frequency and recurrence of A&E attendances, referral pathway toA&E, location of A&E, and age distribution were compared.

RESULTS

Traveller patients attending A&E were younger. There were fewer repeat attendances in the travelling community but proportionally more in the Traveller under-20-year-old cohort. Only 38% of A&E attendances in Travellers (56% non-Travellers) were deemed appropriate (χ 7.16, = 0.007). Only 20% of Travellers (36% non-Travellers) attending A&E were admitted to hospital (χ 6.33, = 0.01). Further, 93% of A&E attendances in Irish Travellers (75% non-Travellers) did not follow initial contact with either a GP or NHS 111 (χ 9.86, <0.002). Finally, 51% of Irish Travellers (6% non-Travellers) attended A&E departments distant to their registered GP practice (χ 89.5, <0.001).

CONCLUSION

This work throws light on health service utilisation patterns by Irish Travellers. A&E attendances may have been more suited to a non-emergency setting and there may have been missed opportunities for contact with primary care or NHS 111, which may have an impact on continuity, onward referral, and quality of care.