Pedersen S
Allergy. 1985 May;40(4):300-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1985.tb00236.x.
In a double blind cross-over study 24 children suffering from acute bronchoconstriction were treated with either placebo, or terbutaline delivered by a pressurized aerosol with a tube spacer (TS), or salbutamol from a dry powder inhaler (Rotahaler = RO). Both active treatments resulted in a significant increase in FEV1 as compared with placebo (P less than 0.001). Furthermore, TS treatment resulted in significantly greater improvement in FEV1 than treatment with the RO (P less than 0.05). Under the conditions of marked airways obstruction problems with correct handling of the RO (loading and breaking the capsule) were prevalent and many children were unable to empty the RO capsule. These difficulties seemed to account for the smaller bronchodilation after RO treatment and were not seen under quiet circumstances. It is recommended that inhalation therapy in children is supervised by an adult during periods of marked airways disease.
在一项双盲交叉研究中,24名患有急性支气管收缩的儿童分别接受了安慰剂治疗,或使用带有储雾罐(TS)的压力气雾剂给予特布他林治疗,或使用干粉吸入器(Rotahaler = RO)给予沙丁胺醇治疗。与安慰剂相比,两种活性治疗均使第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)显著增加(P < 0.001)。此外,TS治疗导致FEV1的改善显著大于RO治疗(P < 0.05)。在气道阻塞严重的情况下,正确操作RO(装入和打开胶囊)存在普遍问题,许多儿童无法将RO胶囊清空。这些困难似乎是RO治疗后支气管扩张较小的原因,而在安静情况下则未出现此类问题。建议在气道疾病严重期间,儿童的吸入治疗应由成人监督。