Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK.
Department of Computer and Information Science, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK.
Med Eng Phys. 2024 Jul;129:104180. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104180. Epub 2024 May 8.
Objective Vestibular/ocular deficits occur with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS) tool is used to assess individuals post-mTBI, which primarily relies upon subjective self-reported symptoms. Instrumenting the VOMS (iVOMS) with technology may allow for more objective assessment post-mTBI, which reflects actual task performance. This study aimed to validate the iVOMS analytically and clinically in mTBI and controls. Methods Seventy-nine people with sub-acute mTBI (<12 weeks post-injury) and forty-four healthy control participants performed the VOMS whilst wearing a mobile eye-tracking on a one-off visit. People with mTBI were included if they were within 12 weeks of a physician diagnosis. Participants were excluded if they had any musculoskeletal, neurological or sensory deficits which could explain dysfunction. A series of custom-made eye tracking algorithms were used to assess recorded eye-movements. Results The iVOMS was analytically valid compared to the reference (ICC 0.85-0.99) in mTBI and controls. The iVOMS outcomes were clinically valid as there were significant differences between groups for convergence, vertical saccades, smooth pursuit, vestibular ocular reflex and visual motion sensitivity outcomes. However, there was no significant relationship between iVOMS outcomes and self-reported symptoms. Conclusion The iVOMS is analytically and clinically valid in mTBI and controls, but further work is required to examine the sensitivity of iVOMS outcomes across the mTBI spectrum. Findings also highlighted that symptom and physiological issue resolution post-mTBI may not coincide and relationships need further examination.
轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)可导致前庭/眼动功能障碍。前庭/眼动运动筛查(VOMS)工具用于评估 mTBI 后个体,主要依赖于主观自我报告的症状。通过技术为 VOMS 配备仪器(iVOMS)可能会更客观地评估 mTBI 后情况,从而反映实际的任务表现。本研究旨在分析和临床验证 mTBI 和对照组中的 iVOMS。
79 名亚急性 mTBI(损伤后<12 周)患者和 44 名健康对照组参与者在一次性就诊时佩戴移动眼动追踪器进行 VOMS。只有在医生诊断后 12 周内的患者才被纳入 mTBI 组。如果参与者存在任何可解释功能障碍的肌肉骨骼、神经或感觉缺陷,则将其排除在外。使用一系列定制的眼动追踪算法评估记录的眼动。
iVOMS 在 mTBI 和对照组中的分析结果是有效的(ICC 0.85-0.99)。iVOMS 结果在临床上是有效的,因为在集合、垂直扫视、平滑追踪、前庭眼反射和视觉运动敏感性结果方面,组间存在显著差异。然而,iVOMS 结果与自我报告的症状之间没有显著关系。
iVOMS 在 mTBI 和对照组中具有分析和临床有效性,但需要进一步研究以检查 iVOMS 结果在 mTBI 谱中的敏感性。研究结果还强调,mTBI 后症状和生理问题的解决可能并不一致,需要进一步研究两者之间的关系。