Suppr超能文献

实时患者体验反馈及数据传递给提供者:系统评价其有效性。

Near real-time patient experience feedback with data relay to providers: a systematic review of its effectiveness.

机构信息

Division of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 453 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.

Center for Education in Health Sciences, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 420 E Superior St, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Jun 22;36(2). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae053.

Abstract

Near Real-Time Feedback (NRTF) on the patient's experience with care, coupled with data relay to providers, can inform quality-of-care improvements, including at the point of care. The objective is to systematically review contemporary literature on the impact of the use of NRTF and data relay to providers on standardized patient experience measures. Six scientific databases and five specialty journals were searched supplemented by snowballing search strategies, according to the registered study protocol. Eligibility included studies in English (2015-2023) assessing the impact of NRTF and data relay on standardized patient-reported experience measures as a primary outcome. Eligibility and quality appraisals were performed by two independent reviewers. An expert former patient (Patient and Family Advisory Council and communication sciences background) helped interpret the results. Eight papers met review eligibility criteria, including three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one non-randomized study. Three of these studies involved in-person NRTF prior to data relay (patient-level data for immediate corrective action or aggregated and peer-compared) and led to significantly better results in all or some of the experience measures. In turn, a kiosk-based NRTF achieved no better experience results. The remaining studies were pre-post designs with mixed or neutral results and greater risks of bias. In-person NRTF on the patient experience followed by rapid data relay to their providers, either patient-level or provider-level as peer-compared, can improve the patient experience of care. Reviewed kiosk-based or self-reported approaches combined with data relay were not effective. Further research should determine which approach (e.g. who conducts the in-person NRTF) will provide better, more efficient improvements and under which circumstances.

摘要

实时反馈(NRTF)患者对护理体验的反馈,以及向提供者传递数据,可以为改善护理质量提供信息,包括在护理点。目的是系统地回顾当代文献,了解使用 NRTF 和向提供者传递数据对标准化患者体验测量的影响。根据已注册的研究方案,在六个科学数据库和五个专业期刊中进行了搜索,并补充了滚雪球式搜索策略。纳入标准包括在 2015 年至 2023 年期间评估 NRTF 和数据向提供者传递对标准化患者报告体验测量影响的英文研究,将其作为主要结果。由两名独立评审员进行资格和质量评估。一名前患者(患者和家庭咨询委员会,沟通科学背景)专家帮助解释结果。八篇论文符合审查标准,包括三项随机对照试验(RCT)和一项非随机研究。其中三项研究涉及在数据传递之前进行面对面的 NRTF(针对即时纠正措施的患者级数据或汇总并与同行比较),所有或部分体验测量结果显著更好。相反,基于亭台的 NRTF 并没有带来更好的体验结果。其余研究是前后设计,结果混合或中性,偏倚风险较高。在患者体验方面进行面对面的 NRTF,然后迅速将数据传递给他们的提供者,无论是患者级别的还是与同行比较的提供者级别的数据,都可以改善患者的护理体验。经过审查的基于亭台或自我报告的方法结合数据传递并不有效。进一步的研究应该确定哪种方法(例如,谁进行面对面的 NRTF)将提供更好、更有效的改进,以及在哪些情况下。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验