Suppr超能文献

自愿信息与价格共享数据库——对八个英联邦成员国定价与采购情况的范围界定审查

Voluntary information and price sharing database - a scoping review of the pricing and procurement landscape across eight Commonwealth Member States.

作者信息

Kebirungi Bridget, Ocran Phyllis, Kamere Nduta, Mabote Lynette Keneilwe, Osi Ngozi, Joshi-von Heyden Meghna, Gilmour Emily, Mghamba Janneth, Robinson Layne, Babar Zaheer-Ud-Din, Rosado Helena, Rutter Victoria

机构信息

Commonwealth Pharmacists Association, London, UK.

Phyllis Ocran, Sekondi Takoradi, Ghana.

出版信息

J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Jul 15;18(1):2523937. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2025.2523937. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Commonwealth Health Ministers' meetings (2021-2023) identified medicines shortages, pricing, and price transparency as critical issues. This led to the establishment of the Voluntary Information and Price Sharing Database (VIPSD) in 2021, aimed at enhancing procurement transparency, reducing costs, and sharing information on health products amongst member states. However, adoption has been limited due to competing initiatives like pooled procurement systems introduced during the pandemic.

METHODS

This scoping review focused on eight Commonwealth countries: Bangladesh, Dominica, Kenya, Malaysia, Malta, Solomon Islands, South Africa, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines. Nations were selected to represent diverse health systems, population sizes, and procurement practices. External researchers conducted literature reviews and standardised data collection to ensure consistency.

RESULTS

The review revealed varied pricing policies and procurement frameworks. Nations like Malta, Bangladesh, Malaysia, and South Africa had pharmaceutical policies ensuring affordability, while others lacked comprehensive pricing policies. Seven countries implemented pooled procurement programmes, enhancing value and reducing costs; three nations operated national health insurance schemes affecting medicine pricing. Five countries used pharmaceutical management information systems to streamline procurement. Despite these efforts, disparities persist due to fragmented frameworks, stock-outs, budget constraints, and delayed procurement processes.

CONCLUSION

The VIPSD was identified as a potentially transformative tool to enhance transparency, promote fair pricing, improve collaboration, and ensure equitable access to innovative health products. To maximise its impact, the database requires clear scope definition, comprehensive data collection, funding, and robust maintenance. Expanding its adoption could help mitigate price disparities and strengthen medicine accessibility across Commonwealth member states.

摘要

背景

英联邦卫生部长会议(2021 - 2023年)将药品短缺、定价及价格透明度确定为关键问题。这促使在2021年建立了自愿信息与价格共享数据库(VIPSD),旨在提高采购透明度、降低成本并在成员国之间共享卫生产品信息。然而,由于疫情期间引入的集中采购系统等竞争举措,该数据库的采用情况有限。

方法

本范围审查聚焦于八个英联邦国家:孟加拉国、多米尼克、肯尼亚、马来西亚、马耳他、所罗门群岛、南非和圣文森特和格林纳丁斯。选择这些国家以代表不同的卫生系统、人口规模和采购做法。外部研究人员进行文献综述和标准化数据收集以确保一致性。

结果

审查揭示了不同的定价政策和采购框架。马耳他、孟加拉国、马来西亚和南非等国家有确保药品可负担性的制药政策,而其他国家缺乏全面的定价政策。七个国家实施了集中采购计划,提高了价值并降低了成本;三个国家运营影响药品定价的国家医疗保险计划。五个国家使用药品管理信息系统来简化采购。尽管做出了这些努力,但由于框架分散、缺货、预算限制和采购流程延迟,差距仍然存在。

结论

VIPSD被确定为一个潜在的变革性工具,可提高透明度、促进公平定价、改善合作并确保公平获取创新卫生产品。为了使其影响最大化,该数据库需要明确的范围定义、全面的数据收集、资金和强有力的维护。扩大其采用范围有助于减轻价格差距并加强英联邦成员国的药品可及性。

相似文献

1
Voluntary information and price sharing database - a scoping review of the pricing and procurement landscape across eight Commonwealth Member States.
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Jul 15;18(1):2523937. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2025.2523937. eCollection 2025.
4
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of financial incentives for prescribers.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 4;2015(8):CD006731. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006731.pub2.
5
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of reference pricing, other pricing, and purchasing policies.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD005979. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005979.
6
Comprehensive care programmes for children with medical complexity.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 30;5(5):CD013329. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013329.pub2.
8
Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults and children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1:CD008965. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008965.pub3.
10
Digital Therapeutics in China: Comprehensive Review.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 27;27:e70955. doi: 10.2196/70955.

本文引用的文献

1
A conceptual framework to build effective medicine pricing policies for low and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Sep;20(9):934-939. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.06.008. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
2
An assessment of vaccine wastage in the Solomon Islands.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jun 9;2(6):e0000572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000572. eCollection 2022.
3
Forming a medicines pricing policy for low and middle-income countries (LMICs): the case for Pakistan.
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022 Feb 24;15(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40545-022-00413-3.
4
Ten recommendations to improve pharmacy practice in low and middle-income countries (LMICs).
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2021 Jan 6;14(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40545-020-00288-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验