• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算节省的开支:佐治亚州药物政策干预对家庭的影响

Counting the savings: impact of Georgia's drug policy interventions on households.

作者信息

Gorgodze Tsotne, Zoidze Akaki, Gotsadze George

机构信息

Curatio International Foundation, Tbilisi, Georgia.

School of Natural Sciences and Medicine, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jun 2;24(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02535-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12939-025-02535-x
PMID:40457347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12131452/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Access to essential medicines is crucial for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and Universal Health Coverage. In Georgia, as in many low- and middle-income countries, out-of-pocket payments (OOPs) for medicines remain a major financial burden, particularly for low-income households. Despite the launch of Georgia's Universal Health Coverage Program in 2013, medicines still constitute the largest share of OOP health expenditures, increasing the risk of impoverishment. This study, therefore, aims to assesses the impact of three pharmaceutical policy interventions introduced between 2017 and 2023 on monthly household drug expenditures.

METHODOLOGY

The analysis utilizes pooled data from Georgia's Household Income and Expenditure Surveys (2015-2023), covering over 88,000 households. Interrupted Time Series (ITS) analysis was employed to evaluate the effects of three policy actions: the 2017 drug reimbursement plan, the 2022 introduction of parallel imports from Turkey, and the 2023 implementation of external reference pricing. Regression models accounted for seasonality and complex survey design, including weights and clustering. Monthly median drug expenditures were adjusted to January 2015 prices.

RESULTS

Only after the introduction of external reference pricing policy in 2023 a significant reduction was observed - an immediate drop of 6.96 GEL (2.51 USD) per household (p = 0.016) and a monthly decline of 1.28 GEL (0.46 USD) (p = 0.002), representing a 29% decrease and saving Georgian households approximately 43.3 million GEL (15.59 million USD) in 2023. The 2022 parallel import policy led to an initial decrease (2.26 GEL; p = 0.39) but was followed by a significant increase over time (coefficient = 1.43, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Addition of external reference pricing policy significantly reduced household pharmaceutical spending and shows promise as a policy tool for other low- and middle-income countries. However, sustained impact requires continued monitoring and complementary measures to ensure equitable access and long-term benefits.

摘要

引言

获取基本药物对于实现可持续发展目标和全民健康覆盖至关重要。在格鲁吉亚,与许多低收入和中等收入国家一样,药品的自付费用(OOP)仍然是一项重大财务负担,对低收入家庭而言尤其如此。尽管格鲁吉亚在2013年启动了全民健康覆盖计划,但药品在自付医疗支出中仍占最大份额,增加了贫困风险。因此,本研究旨在评估2017年至2023年期间实施的三项药品政策干预措施对家庭每月药品支出的影响。

方法

该分析使用了格鲁吉亚家庭收入和支出调查(2015 - 2023年)的汇总数据,涵盖超过88,000个家庭。采用中断时间序列(ITS)分析来评估三项政策行动的效果:2017年的药品报销计划、2022年引入来自土耳其的平行进口药品以及2023年实施的外部参考定价。回归模型考虑了季节性和复杂的调查设计,包括权重和聚类。每月药品支出中位数已按2015年1月的价格进行调整。

结果

仅在2023年实施外部参考定价政策后,才观察到显著下降——每户立即下降6.96格鲁吉亚拉里(2.51美元)(p = 0.016),每月下降1.28格鲁吉亚拉里(0.46美元)(p = 0.002),降幅达29%,2023年为格鲁吉亚家庭节省了约4330万格鲁吉亚拉里(1559万美元)。2022年的平行进口政策导致最初下降(2.26格鲁吉亚拉里;p = 0.39),但随后随着时间推移显著增加(系数 = 1.43,p < 0.001)。

结论

引入外部参考定价政策显著降低了家庭药品支出,并有望成为其他低收入和中等收入国家的政策工具。然而,要持续产生影响,需要持续监测并采取补充措施,以确保公平获取和长期效益。

相似文献

1
Counting the savings: impact of Georgia's drug policy interventions on households.计算节省的开支:佐治亚州药物政策干预对家庭的影响
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jun 2;24(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02535-x.
2
Determining household out of pocket payments, incidence of catastrophic expenditures and impoverishment among patients with malaria in Zambia's path towards Universal Health Coverage.在赞比亚迈向全民健康覆盖的道路上,确定疟疾患者的家庭自付费用、灾难性支出发生率和贫困情况。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 10;19(12):e0312906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312906. eCollection 2024.
3
Economic Burden of Chronic Ill Health and Injuries for Households in Low- and Middle-Income Countries低收入和中等收入国家家庭慢性疾病和伤害的经济负担
4
Financial risk protection of Thailand's universal health coverage: results from series of national household surveys between 1996 and 2015.泰国全民健康保险的财务风险保护:1996年至2015年一系列全国家庭调查的结果
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Sep 21;19(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01273-6.
5
Catastrophic and impoverishing impacts of health expenditures: a focus on non-communicable diseases in Pokhara Metropolitan City, Nepal.医疗支出的灾难性和致贫影响:聚焦尼泊尔博卡拉市的非传染性疾病
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):1283. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22418-8.
6
Assessing medical impoverishment and associated factors in health care in Ethiopia.评估埃塞俄比亚医疗保健中的医疗贫困状况及其相关因素。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12914-020-00227-x.
7
Household catastrophic health expenditure: evidence from Georgia and its policy implications.家庭灾难性医疗支出:来自格鲁吉亚的证据及其政策影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr 28;9:69. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-69.
8
Catastrophic healthcare expenditure and poverty related to out-of-pocket payments for healthcare in Bangladesh-an estimation of financial risk protection of universal health coverage.孟加拉国医疗保健支出的灾难性影响和与医疗保健自付费用相关的贫困问题——全民健康覆盖的财务风险保护评估。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Oct 1;32(8):1102-1110. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx048.
9
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of reference pricing, other pricing, and purchasing policies.药品政策:参考定价、其他定价及采购政策的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 16;2014(10):CD005979. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005979.pub2.
10
Quantifying the financial burden of households' out-of-pocket payments on medicines in India: a repeated cross-sectional analysis of National Sample Survey data, 1994-2014.量化印度家庭药品自付费用的经济负担:1994-2014 年全国抽样调查数据的重复横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 31;8(5):e018020. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018020.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of national volume-based procurement policy on the usage and expenditure of platinum antineoplastic drugs in China: an interrupted time series study.国家集中带量采购政策对中国铂类抗肿瘤药物使用及支出的影响:一项中断时间序列研究
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 25;16:1593099. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1593099. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
What influences the impact of health financing reforms? Using qualitative comparative analysis to identify patterns in health financing systems and their effects on financial protection.哪些因素会影响卫生筹资改革的效果?运用定性比较分析来确定卫生筹资系统的模式及其对财务保护的影响。
SSM Health Syst. 2025 Jun;4:100055. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100055.
2
A conceptual framework to build effective medicine pricing policies for low and middle-income countries (LMICs).为中低收入国家(LMICs)制定有效的药品定价政策的概念框架。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Sep;20(9):934-939. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.06.008. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
3
Application and Use of Andersen's Behavioral Model as Theoretical Framework: A Systematic Literature Review from 2012-2021.
将安徒生行为模型作为理论框架的应用与使用:2012 - 2021年系统文献综述
Iran J Public Health. 2023 Jul;52(7):1346-1354. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i7.13236.
4
How does external reference pricing work in developing countries: evidence from Iran.外部参考定价在发展中国家如何运作:来自伊朗的证据。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jun 20;14:1034229. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1034229. eCollection 2023.
5
Assessing the Consequences of External Reference Pricing for Global Access to Medicines and Innovation: Economic Analysis and Policy Implications.评估外部参考定价对全球药品可及性与创新的影响:经济分析与政策启示
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 6;13:815029. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.815029. eCollection 2022.
6
Three Statistical Approaches for Assessment of Intervention Effects: A Primer for Practitioners.评估干预效果的三种统计方法:从业者入门指南。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Feb 22;14:757-770. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S275831. eCollection 2021.
7
Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial.中断时间序列回归在公共卫生干预措施评价中的应用:教程。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):348-355. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw098.
8
Use of interrupted time series analysis in evaluating health care quality improvements.使用中断时间序列分析评估医疗质量改进
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.08.002.
9
An overview of the health care system in Georgia: expert recommendations in the context of predictive, preventive and personalised medicine.格鲁吉亚医疗体系概述:预测、预防和个体化医学背景下的专家建议。
EPMA J. 2013 Feb 26;4(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1878-5085-4-8.
10
Do pharmaceutical prices respond to potential patient out-of-pocket expenses?药品价格会对患者潜在的自付费用做出反应吗?
Rand J Econ. 2002 Autumn;33(3):469-87.