文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Safety and Preliminary Effectiveness of Lateral Transiliac Sacroiliac Joint Fusion by Interventional Pain Physicians: A Retrospective Analysis.

作者信息

Jung Michael W

机构信息

Wisconsin Spine and Pain, Sheboygan, WI, 53081, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2024 Jun 17;17:2147-2153. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S462072. eCollection 2024.


DOI:10.2147/JPR.S462072
PMID:38910592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11192291/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion has become the mainstay treatment for chronic refractory sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Multiple procedures are now available including transfixing procedures with implants placed in the lateral or posterolateral transiliac trajectories, and intra-articular procedures with devices and/or allograft placed via a dorsal approach. To date, the published literature on the lateral approach has been primarily by surgeons. This retrospective chart review aims to evaluate the safety and preliminary effectiveness when the procedure is performed by physicians trained in interventional pain management. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent lateral SI joint fusion using a lateral transiliac approach between December 2022 and September 2023 by a single physician. Data on demographics, perioperative details, complications, and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed. The study was reviewed by WCG IRB and received an exemption authorization. RESULTS: Medical charts were reviewed for the first 49 consecutive cases performed. Mean (SD, range) age was 64 (11, 34-83), BMI was 32.5 (8.4), 59% were female, 35% were smokers, and 82% were on opioids at baseline. Mean (SD) operative time was 40 (11) minutes and all procedures were performed at an ambulatory surgery center under monitored anesthesia care. No device- or procedure-related complications occurred. Mean follow up was 175 days; Mean (SD) baseline reported pain was 9 (1.5) on a 0-10 numerical rating scale. At follow up, 88% of the patients reported ≥50% pain relief. Six patients who reported 0% relief suffer from multiple pain generators and are on long term opioids. CONCLUSION: Results of this single center experience support the safety of lateral SI joint fusion using a threaded implant when performed by interventional pain management physicians. However, further prospective studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-ups are warranted to validate these findings.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Safety and Preliminary Effectiveness of Lateral Transiliac Sacroiliac Joint Fusion by Interventional Pain Physicians: A Retrospective Analysis.

J Pain Res. 2024-6-17

[2]
Minimally Invasive SI Joint Fusion Procedures for Chronic SI Joint Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy.

Int J Spine Surg. 2023-12-26

[3]
Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review.

Spine J. 2022-8

[4]
Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study.

Med Devices (Auckl). 2013-12-13

[5]
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium versus Cylindrical Threaded Implants: A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

World Neurosurg. 2019-10-9

[6]
Salvage of Failed Lateral Sacroiliac Joint Fusion with a Novel Posterior Sacroiliac Fusion Device: Diagnostic Approach, Surgical Technique, and Multicenter Case Series.

J Pain Res. 2022-5-12

[7]
CT Scan and Clinical Outcomes of Novel Lateral-Oblique Percutaneous Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Fixation: Technique and Literature Review.

Cureus. 2021-7-15

[8]
Revision of Failed Sacroiliac Joint Posterior Interpositional Structural Allograft Stabilization with Lateral Porous Titanium Implants: A Multicenter Case Series.

Med Devices (Auckl). 2022-7-20

[9]
Clinical outcomes for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with allograft using a posterior approach.

Pain Pract. 2025-1

[10]
Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pathology Over the Past 10 Years: Review of Scientific Evidence for New Devices for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

Cureus. 2021-6-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Intractable Pain Caused by Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Case Report.

NMC Case Rep J. 2025-4-1

[2]
Utility of minimally invasive percutaneous arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for the treatment of low back pain: systematic review of the literature.

Eur Spine J. 2025-3

本文引用的文献

[1]
Minimally Invasive SI Joint Fusion Procedures for Chronic SI Joint Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy.

Int J Spine Surg. 2023-12-26

[2]
Topographic localization of the sacroiliac joint and superior gluteal artery branches on the posterolateral ilium.

Clin Anat. 2023-10

[3]
Revision of Failed Sacroiliac Joint Posterior Interpositional Structural Allograft Stabilization with Lateral Porous Titanium Implants: A Multicenter Case Series.

Med Devices (Auckl). 2022-7-20

[4]
Six Month Interim Outcomes from SECURE: A Single arm, Multicenter, Prospective, Clinical Study on a Novel Minimally Invasive Posterior Sacroiliac Fusion Device.

Expert Rev Med Devices. 2022-5

[5]
Preoperative CT simulation of iliosacral screws for treating unstable posterior pelvic ring injury.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022-3-8

[6]
Sacral Dysmorphism Increases the Risk of Superior Gluteal Artery Injury in Percutaneous Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Case Report and Literature Review.

Cureus. 2021-11-13

[7]
A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of the Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Posterior Sacroiliac Fusion Device.

J Pain Res. 2021-10-14

[8]
Interventional Spine and Pain Procedure Credentialing: Guidelines from the American Society of Pain & Neuroscience.

J Pain Res. 2021-9-8

[9]
Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using a novel hydroxyapatite-coated screw: final 2-year clinical and radiographic results.

J Spine Surg. 2021-6

[10]
Superior gluteal artery injury risk from third sacral segment transsacral screw insertion.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022-7

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索