微创骶髂关节融合术的安全性及6个月疗效:一项前瞻性研究。

Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study.

作者信息

Duhon Bradley S, Cher Daniel J, Wine Kathryn D, Lockstadt Harry, Kovalsky Don, Soo Cheng-Lun

机构信息

Neurosurgical and Spine Specialists, Parker, CO.

SI-BONE, Inc, San Jose, CA.

出版信息

Med Devices (Auckl). 2013 Dec 13;6:219-29. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S55197. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sacroiliac (SI) joint pain is an often overlooked cause of low back pain. SI joint arthrodesis has been reported to relieve pain and improve quality of life in patients suffering from degeneration or disruption of the SI joint who have failed non-surgical care. We report herein early results of a multicenter prospective single-arm cohort of patients with SI joint degeneration or disruption who underwent minimally invasive fusion using the iFuse Implant System®.

METHODS

The safety cohort includes 94 subjects at 23 sites with chronic SI joint pain who met study eligibility criteria and underwent minimally invasive SI joint fusion with the iFuse Implant System® between August 2012 and September 2013. Subjects underwent structured assessments preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, including SI joint and back pain visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-36 (SF-36), and EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D). Patient satisfaction with surgery was assessed at 6 months. The effectiveness cohort includes the 32 subjects who have had 6-month follow-up to date.

RESULTS

Mean subject age was 51 years (n=94, safety cohort) and 66% of patients were women. Subjects were highly debilitated at baseline (mean VAS pain score 78, mean ODI score 54). Three implants were used in 80% of patients; two patients underwent staged bilateral implants. Twenty-three adverse events occurred within 1 month of surgery and 29 additional events occurred between 30 days and latest follow-up. Six adverse events were severe but none were device-related. Complete 6-month postoperative follow-up was available in 26 subjects. In the effectiveness cohort, mean (± standard deviation) SI joint pain improved from a baseline score of 76 (±16.2) to a 6-month score of 29.3 (±23.3, an improvement of 49 points, P<0.0001), mean ODI improved from 55.3 (±10.7) to 38.9 (±18.5, an improvement of 15.8 points, P<0.0001) and SF-36 PCS improved from 30.7 (±4.3) to 37.0 (±10.7, an improvement of 6.7 points, P=0.003). Ninety percent of subjects who were ambulatory at baseline regained full ambulation by month 6; median time to full ambulation was 30 days. Satisfaction with the procedure was high at 85%.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive SI joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System® is safe. Mid-term follow-up indicates a high rate of improvement in pain and function with high rates of patient satisfaction.

摘要

背景

骶髂关节疼痛是导致腰痛的一个常被忽视的原因。据报道,骶髂关节融合术可缓解患有骶髂关节退变或破坏且非手术治疗无效的患者的疼痛并改善其生活质量。我们在此报告一项多中心前瞻性单臂队列研究的早期结果,该队列研究的对象为接受使用iFuse植入系统®进行微创融合术的骶髂关节退变或破坏患者。

方法

安全队列包括来自23个地点的94名患有慢性骶髂关节疼痛且符合研究纳入标准的受试者,他们于2012年8月至2013年9月间接受了使用iFuse植入系统®的微创骶髂关节融合术。受试者在术前、术后即刻、术后1个月、3个月和6个月接受结构化评估,包括骶髂关节和背部疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、简短健康调查问卷36项(SF-36)和欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)。在术后6个月评估患者对手术的满意度。有效性队列包括截至目前已进行6个月随访的32名受试者。

结果

受试者的平均年龄为51岁(n = 94,安全队列),66%的患者为女性。受试者在基线时功能严重受损(平均VAS疼痛评分78分,平均ODI评分54分)。80%的患者使用了3枚植入物;2名患者接受了分期双侧植入。23例不良事件发生在术后1个月内,另外29例事件发生在术后30天至最近一次随访期间。6例不良事件严重,但均与器械无关。26名受试者获得了术后6个月的完整随访。在有效性队列中,骶髂关节疼痛平均(±标准差)从基线评分76(±16.2)分改善至6个月时的29.3(±23.3)分(改善了49分,P < 0.0001),平均ODI从55.3(±10.7)分改善至38.9(±18.5)分(改善了15.8分,P < 0.0001),SF-36身体成分评分从30.7(±4.3)分改善至37.0(±10.7)分(改善了6.7分,P = 0.003)。基线时可行走的受试者中有90%在第6个月时恢复了完全行走能力;恢复完全行走的中位时间为30天。对该手术的满意度较高,为85%。

结论

使用iFuse植入系统®进行微创骶髂关节融合术是安全的。中期随访表明疼痛和功能改善率高,患者满意度高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce1/3865972/b246ea56b6c7/mder-6-219Fig1.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索