Suppr超能文献

过去10年骶髂关节病理学的诊断与治疗趋势:骶髂关节融合新器械的科学证据综述

Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pathology Over the Past 10 Years: Review of Scientific Evidence for New Devices for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

作者信息

Himstead Alexander S, Brown Nolan J, Shahrestani Shane, Tran Katelynn, Davies Jordan L, Oh Michael

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Jun 3;13(6):e15415. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15415. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Sacroiliac (SI) joint pathology is a newly appreciated contributor to lower back pain. Sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) has grown rapidly in popularity in association with the advent of minimally-invasive surgical techniques. This has led to an explosion of new medical devices used for SIJF. The objective of this article is to outline clinical trends, summarize the current data, and categorize novel devices for SIJF. Trends in SI joint pathology and fusion were obtained via the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database and Web of Science. To review literature on devices for SIJF, PubMed was searched using the Boolean phrase "sacroiliac joint AND (fusion OR arthrodesis)" since 2010. To establish a list of SIJF devices not represented in the literature, searches were performed on the FDA 510(k), premarket approval, and de novo databases, as well as Google and LinkedIn. Literature review yielded 11 FDA-approved devices for minimally invasive SIJF. Database query yielded an additional 22 devices for a total of 33 devices. Twenty-one devices used the lateral transiliac approach, six posterior allograft approach, three posterolateral approach, and three combined the lateral transiliac and posterolateral approaches. The evidence for the lateral transiliac approach is the most robust. Many novel devices have been developed for minimally invasive SIJF over the past 10 years. Further randomized comparative trials are warranted to evaluate different surgical approaches and novel devices at this time.

摘要

骶髂关节(SI)病变是下背痛的一个新发现的成因。随着微创外科技术的出现,骶髂关节融合术(SIJF)越来越受欢迎。这导致了用于SIJF的新型医疗设备激增。本文的目的是概述临床趋势、总结当前数据,并对用于SIJF的新型设备进行分类。通过医疗保健成本与利用项目(HCUP)的全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库和科学网获取骶髂关节病变和融合的趋势。为了回顾关于SIJF设备的文献,自2010年以来,使用布尔短语“骶髂关节AND(融合或关节固定术)”在PubMed上进行了搜索。为了建立文献中未提及的SIJF设备清单,在食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的510(k)、上市前批准和从头开始数据库以及谷歌和领英上进行了搜索。文献综述产生了11种经FDA批准的用于微创SIJF的设备。数据库查询又产生了另外22种设备,总共33种设备。21种设备采用经髂骨外侧入路,6种采用后同种异体移植物入路,3种采用后外侧入路,3种采用经髂骨外侧和后外侧联合入路。经髂骨外侧入路的证据最为充分。在过去10年中,已经开发了许多用于微创SIJF的新型设备。此时有必要进行进一步的随机对照试验,以评估不同的手术方法和新型设备。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验