• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复合皮肤质量量表的开发与验证

Development and Validation of a Composite Skin Quality Scale.

作者信息

Gold Michael, Lorenc Z Paul, Bass Lawrence S, Bank David, Downie Jeanine, Bellia Gilberto, Giori Andrea, Grimolizzi Franco

出版信息

Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024 May 22;6:ojae038. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojae038. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1093/asjof/ojae038
PMID:38912092
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11192058/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The increasing demand for skin quality interventions in aesthetic medicine underscores the necessity for objective, evidence-based assessment tools that may be used to evaluate novel interventions or devices.

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a 5-point photonumeric rating scale for assessing overall skin quality, including radiance, color evenness, and smoothness.

METHODS

The IBSA (Institut Biochimique SA) Composite Skin Quality Scale was developed and underwent live validation with 88 real-world patients, chosen to encompass a broad spectrum of skin qualities and Fitzpatrick skin types. Scale validation was performed by board-certified plastic surgeons and dermatologists over 2 rounds, 2 weeks apart. Reliability was assessed through intrarater and interrater agreements, utilizing weighted kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The scale's ability to discern a clinically relevant 1-grade difference was evaluated with 72 photo pairs.

RESULTS

Combined intrarater reliability results showed weighted kappa values of 0.812 (right side) and 0.815 (left side) and an ICC of 0.903 for both sides, indicating an almost perfect agreement. Interrater reliability ranged from substantial to almost perfect, with kappa coefficients between 0.654 and 0.853 and ICCs between 0.657 and 0.855 across all rater pairs in both rounds. The ability to detect a clinically relevant 1-point difference using the scale was established.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating various key aspects of skin quality, the IBSA Composite Skin Quality Scale is a clinically relevant and highly reliable tool, suitable for skin assessment in clinical studies of new aesthetic technologies and products.

摘要

背景

美容医学中对皮肤质量干预措施的需求不断增加,凸显了使用客观、循证评估工具来评估新型干预措施或设备的必要性。

目的

开发并验证一种用于评估整体皮肤质量(包括光泽度、颜色均匀度和平滑度)的5分数字评分量表。

方法

开发了IBSA(生物化学研究所SA)综合皮肤质量量表,并在88名真实患者中进行了现场验证,这些患者涵盖了广泛的皮肤质量和Fitzpatrick皮肤类型。量表验证由获得委员会认证的整形外科医生和皮肤科医生分两轮进行,两轮间隔2周。通过评分者内和评分者间的一致性评估可靠性,使用加权kappa统计量和组内相关系数(ICC)。用72对照片评估该量表辨别临床上相关的1级差异的能力。

结果

综合评分者内可靠性结果显示,加权kappa值右侧为0.812,左侧为0.815,两侧的ICC均为0.903,表明几乎完全一致。评分者间可靠性从高度一致到几乎完全一致,两轮中所有评分者对的kappa系数在0.654至0.853之间,ICC在0.657至0.855之间。确定了使用该量表检测临床上相关的1分差异的能力。

结论

IBSA综合皮肤质量量表整合了皮肤质量的各个关键方面,是一种临床相关且高度可靠的工具,适用于新美容技术和产品临床研究中的皮肤评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f6e/11192058/6e7ee08e5f08/ojae038f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f6e/11192058/6e7ee08e5f08/ojae038f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f6e/11192058/6e7ee08e5f08/ojae038f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a Composite Skin Quality Scale.复合皮肤质量量表的开发与验证
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024 May 22;6:ojae038. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojae038. eCollection 2024.
2
Validating the Reliability and Clinical Relevance of an Infraorbital Hollow Photonumeric Scale.验证眶下凹陷光子数字量表的可靠性和临床相关性。
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023 Aug 9;5:ojad052. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojad052. eCollection 2023.
3
Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Jawline Contour.用于评估下颌轮廓的数字评分量表的开发与验证
J Drugs Dermatol. 2023 Feb 1;22(2):203-209. doi: 10.36849/JDD.7193.
4
Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.瘢痕美观评估和分级(SCAR)量表作为术后瘢痕的一种结局测量工具,其可靠性和照片等效性。
JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Jan 1;153(1):55-60. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.3757.
5
Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Lip Fullness.唇饱满度的光数值评估量表的制定与验证。
J Drugs Dermatol. 2023 Mar 1;22(3):274-281. doi: 10.36849/JDD.7309.
6
Validating a Series of Photonumeric Rating Scales for Use in Facial Aesthetics Using Statistical Analysis of Intra- and Inter-rater Reliability.使用评分者内和评分者间信度的统计分析验证一系列用于面部美学的数字评分量表。
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2021 Oct 21;3(4):ojab039. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojab039. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Validating the Reliability and Clinical Relevance of a Nasolabial Fold Photonumeric Scale.验证鼻唇沟光子数字量表的可靠性和临床相关性。
J Drugs Dermatol. 2024 Jan 1;23(1):1319-1324. doi: 10.36849/JDD.7316.
8
Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Skin Texture.用于评估面部皮肤纹理的数字评分量表的开发与验证
Dermatol Surg. 2016 Oct;42 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S219-S226. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000852.
9
Development and validation of a global photonumeric scale for evaluating skin quality of aged female facial skin.用于评估老年女性面部皮肤质量的全球光子数值量表的开发与验证
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Dec;20(12):4032-4039. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14058. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
10
Novel, Validated, 5-Point Photonumeric Scales for Assessment of the Perioral Region.新型经验证的 5 分光电数字评分量表用于评估口周区域。
Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Oct 13;43(11):1347-1356. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad103.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming Skin Quality Evaluation With AI: From Subjective Grading to Data-Driven Precision.利用人工智能转变皮肤质量评估:从主观评分到数据驱动的精准评估
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025 Sep;24 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):e70371. doi: 10.1111/jocd.70371.

本文引用的文献

1
Restoring Adipose Tissue Homeostasis in Response to Aging: Initial Clinical Experience with Profhilo Structura.恢复脂肪组织对衰老的稳态反应:Profhilo Structura的初步临床经验
Gels. 2023 Jul 28;9(8):614. doi: 10.3390/gels9080614.
2
Clinical and Ultrasound Evaluation of Skin Quality After Subdermal Injection of Two Non-Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid-Based Fillers.皮下注射两种非交联透明质酸填充剂后皮肤质量的临床及超声评估
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023 Aug 10;16:2175-2183. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S402409. eCollection 2023.
3
Non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review.
白癜风的非侵入性皮肤测量方法与诊断:一项系统综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 27;10:1200963. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1200963. eCollection 2023.
4
A Randomized, Multicenter, Evaluator-blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of VYC-12L Treatment for Skin Quality Improvements.一项评估 VYC-12L 治疗改善皮肤质量的安全性和有效性的随机、多中心、评估者盲法研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2023 Jul 1;49(7):682-688. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003802. Epub 2023 May 9.
5
Psychosocial implications of rare genetic skin diseases affecting appearance on daily life experiences, emotional state, self-perception and quality of life in adults: a systematic review.罕见遗传性皮肤疾病对成年人日常生活体验、情绪状态、自我认知和生活质量的心理社会影响:系统评价。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Feb 23;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02629-1.
6
Efficacy and Tolerability of Hybrid Complexes of High- and Low-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronan Intradermal Injections for the Treatment of Skin Roughness and Laxity of the Neck.高、低相对分子质量透明质酸皮内注射混合复合物治疗颈部皮肤粗糙和松弛的疗效和耐受性。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2022 Sep 17;2022:4497176. doi: 10.1155/2022/4497176. eCollection 2022.
7
A split-face comparative performance evaluation of injectable hyaluronic acid-based preparations HCC and CPM-HA20G in healthy females.在健康女性中进行注射用透明质酸类制剂 HCC 和 CPM-HA20G 的对照性面部分割评估。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Nov;21(11):5576-5583. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15157. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
8
Ultrasound measurements of pathological and physiological skin thickness: a scoping review protocol.超声测量病理性和生理性皮肤厚度:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):e056720. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056720.
9
Skin measurement devices to assess skin quality: A systematic review on reliability and validity.皮肤测量设备评估皮肤质量:可靠性和有效性的系统评价。
Skin Res Technol. 2022 Mar;28(2):212-224. doi: 10.1111/srt.13113. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
10
Facial Aesthetic Priorities and Concerns: A Physician and Patient Perception Global Survey.面部美学优先事项与关注点:一项医生与患者认知的全球调查
Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Mar 15;42(4):NP218-NP229. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab358.