Abdi Parsa, Anthony Michelle R, Farkouh Christopher, Chan Airiss R, Kooner Amritpal, Qureshi Simal, Maibach Howard
Memorial University of Newfoundland, Faculty of Medicine, St. Johns, NL, Canada.
College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 27;10:1200963. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1200963. eCollection 2023.
Vitiligo is a multifaceted autoimmune depigmenting disorder affecting around 0.5 to 2.0% of individuals globally. Standardizing diagnosis and therapy tracking can be arduous, as numerous clinical evaluation methods are subject to interobserver variability and may not be validated. Therefore, there is a need for diagnostic tools that are objective, dependable, and preferably non-invasive.
This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the non-invasive objective skin measurement methods that are currently used to evaluate the diagnosis, severity, and progression of vitiligo, as well as the advantages and limitations of each technique.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was used for the systematic review. Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched for non-invasive imaging and biophysical skin measuring methods to diagnose, evaluate the severity of, or monitor the effects of vitiligo treatment. The risk of bias in included articles was assessed using the QUADAS-2 quality assessment scale.
An extensive literature search resulted in 64 studies for analysis, describing eight imaging techniques (reflectance confocal microscopy, computer-aided imaging analysis, optical coherence tomography, infrared photography, third-harmonic generation microscopy, multiphoton microscopy, ultraviolet light photography, and visible light/digital photograph), and three biophysical approaches (dermoscopy, colorimetry, spectrometry) used in diagnosing and assessing vitiligo. Pertinent information about functionality, mechanisms of action, sensitivity, and specificity was obtained for all studies, and insights into the strengths and limitations of each diagnostic technique were addressed. Methodological study quality was adequate; however, statistical analysis was not achievable because of the variety of methods evaluated and the non-standardized reporting of diagnostic accuracy results.
The results of this systematic review can enhance clinical practice and research by providing a comprehensive overview of the spectrum of non-invasive imaging and biophysical techniques in vitiligo assessment. Studies with larger sample sizes and sound methodology are required to develop verified methods for use in future practice and research.
(PROSPERO) database, (CRD42023395996).
白癜风是一种多方面的自身免疫性色素脱失性疾病,全球约0.5%至2.0%的人受其影响。由于众多临床评估方法存在观察者间差异且可能未经验证,因此标准化诊断和治疗跟踪可能很艰巨。所以,需要客观、可靠且最好是非侵入性的诊断工具。
本系统评价全面概述了目前用于评估白癜风诊断、严重程度和进展的非侵入性客观皮肤测量方法,以及每种技术的优缺点。
系统评价采用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单。全面检索了Scopus、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science数据库,以查找用于诊断、评估白癜风严重程度或监测白癜风治疗效果的非侵入性成像和生物物理皮肤测量方法。使用QUADAS-2质量评估量表评估纳入文章的偏倚风险。
广泛的文献检索产生了64项可供分析的研究,描述了用于诊断和评估白癜风的8种成像技术(反射式共聚焦显微镜、计算机辅助成像分析、光学相干断层扫描、红外摄影、三次谐波产生显微镜、多光子显微镜、紫外线摄影和可见光/数码摄影)以及3种生物物理方法(皮肤镜检查、比色法、光谱法)。获取了所有研究的有关功能、作用机制、敏感性和特异性的相关信息,并探讨了每种诊断技术的优缺点。方法学研究质量尚可;然而,由于评估方法多样且诊断准确性结果报告不规范,无法进行统计分析。
本系统评价的结果通过全面概述白癜风评估中非侵入性成像和生物物理技术的范围,可加强临床实践和研究。需要开展样本量更大且方法合理的研究,以开发用于未来实践和研究的经过验证的方法。
(PROSPERO)数据库,(CRD42023395996)