• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解家庭层面在为儿童寻求急性外科治疗时的决策:一项横断面混合方法研究方案。

Understanding family-level decision-making when seeking access to acute surgical care for children: Protocol for a cross-sectional mixed methods study.

机构信息

Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, United States of America.

Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jun 24;19(6):e0304165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304165. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0304165
PMID:38913675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11195935/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is limited understanding of how social determinants of health (SDOH) impact family decision-making when seeking surgical care for children. Our objectives of this study are to identify key family experiences that contribute to decision-making when accessing surgical care for children, to confirm if family experiences impact delays in care, and to describe differences in family experiences across populations (race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, rurality).

METHODS

We will use a prospective, cross-sectional, mixed methods design to examine family experiences during access to care for children with appendicitis. Participants will include 242 parents of consecutive children (0-17 years) with acute appendicitis over a 15-month period at two academic health systems in North Carolina and Virginia. We will collect demographic and clinical data. Parents will be administered the Adult Responses to Children's Symptoms survey (ARCS), the child and parental forms of the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) survey, the Accountable Health Communities Health-Related Social Needs Screening Tool, and Single Item Literacy Screener. Parallel ARCS data will be collected from child participants (8-17 years). We will use nested concurrent, purposive sampling to select a subset of families for semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data will be analyzed using thematic analysis and integrated with quantitative data to identify emerging themes that inform a conceptual model of family-level decision-making during access to surgical care. Multivariate linear regression will be used to determine association between the appendicitis perforation rate and ARCS responses (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes include comparison of health literacy, ACEs, and SDOH, clinical outcomes, and family experiences across populations.

DISCUSSION

We expect to identify key family experiences when accessing care for appendicitis which may impact outcomes and differ across populations. Increased understanding of how SDOH and family experiences influence family decision-making may inform novel strategies to mitigate surgical disparities in children.

摘要

背景

对于社会决定因素(SDOH)如何影响家庭在为儿童寻求手术护理时的决策,人们的理解有限。本研究的目的是确定关键的家庭体验,这些体验有助于为儿童获得手术护理做出决策,确认家庭体验是否会影响护理的延迟,并描述不同人群(种族、族裔、社会经济地位、农村)的家庭体验差异。

方法

我们将采用前瞻性、横断面、混合方法设计,研究儿童阑尾炎就诊过程中的家庭体验。参与者将包括在北卡罗来纳州和弗吉尼亚州的两个学术医疗系统中,在 15 个月的时间内连续 242 名患有急性阑尾炎的儿童(0-17 岁)的父母。我们将收集人口统计学和临床数据。父母将接受成人对儿童症状的反应调查(ARCS)、儿童和父母形式的不良童年经历(ACE)调查、负责任的社区健康相关社会需求筛查工具和单项识字筛查。将从儿童参与者(8-17 岁)中收集并行的 ARCS 数据。我们将使用嵌套的同期、有针对性的抽样方法,从家庭中选择一部分进行半结构访谈。使用主题分析对定性数据进行分析,并将其与定量数据相结合,以确定告知手术护理就诊过程中家庭层面决策的概念模型的新兴主题。将使用多元线性回归来确定阑尾穿孔率与 ARCS 反应之间的关联(主要结果)。次要结果包括比较不同人群的健康素养、ACE 和 SDOH、临床结局和家庭体验。

讨论

我们预计将确定在阑尾炎就诊时影响结局并在不同人群中存在差异的关键家庭体验。深入了解 SDOH 和家庭体验如何影响家庭决策,可能为缓解儿童手术差异提供新的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02eb/11195935/5c0dbd310c02/pone.0304165.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02eb/11195935/0eeb9be42ebc/pone.0304165.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02eb/11195935/5c0dbd310c02/pone.0304165.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02eb/11195935/0eeb9be42ebc/pone.0304165.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02eb/11195935/5c0dbd310c02/pone.0304165.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding family-level decision-making when seeking access to acute surgical care for children: Protocol for a cross-sectional mixed methods study.了解家庭层面在为儿童寻求急性外科治疗时的决策:一项横断面混合方法研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 24;19(6):e0304165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304165. eCollection 2024.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Parental experiences of end of life care decision-making for children with life-limiting conditions in the paediatric intensive care unit: a qualitative interview study.儿科重症监护病房中患有危及生命疾病的儿童的父母在临终关怀决策方面的体验:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e028548. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028548.
4
Shared decision-making and parental experiences with health services to meet their child's special health care needs: Racial and ethnic disparities.共同决策和父母对满足其子女特殊医疗保健需求的卫生服务的体验:种族和民族差异。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Oct;101(10):1753-1760. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 May 31.
5
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
6
Perceived influence, decision-making and access to information in family services as factors of parental empowerment: a cross-sectional study of parents with young children.家庭服务中感知到的影响、决策制定及信息获取作为父母赋权的因素:一项针对有幼儿的父母的横断面研究
Scand J Caring Sci. 2016 Jun;30(2):290-302. doi: 10.1111/scs.12243. Epub 2015 May 23.
7
The experiences of acute non-surgical pain of children who present to a healthcare facility for treatment: a systematic review protocol.前往医疗机构接受治疗的儿童急性非手术疼痛经历:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):12-20. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2466.
8
Parent's information seeking in acute childhood illness: what helps and what hinders decision making?父母在儿童急性疾病中的信息寻求:哪些因素有助于或阻碍决策?
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):3044-56. doi: 10.1111/hex.12289. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
9
Associations of adverse childhood experiences with educational attainment and adolescent health and the role of family and socioeconomic factors: A prospective cohort study in the UK.不良童年经历与受教育程度及青少年健康的关系,以及家庭和社会经济因素的作用:英国一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Mar 2;17(3):e1003031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003031. eCollection 2020 Mar.
10
Understanding factors influencing care seeking for sick children in Ebonyi and Kogi States, Nigeria.了解尼日利亚埃邦伊州和科吉州影响儿童患病就医寻求的因素。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 24;20(1):746. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08536-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Race and Family Socioeconomic Status With Pediatric Postoperative Mortality.种族和家庭社会经济地位与儿科术后死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222989. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2989.
2
Economic Trends of Racial Disparities in Pediatric Postappendectomy Complications.儿科阑尾切除术后并发症的种族差异的经济趋势。
Pediatrics. 2021 Oct;148(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-051328. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
3
Which Definition of Rurality Should I Use?: The Relative Performance of 8 Federal Rural Definitions in Identifying Rural-Urban Disparities.
我应该使用哪种农村定义?8 种联邦农村定义在识别城乡差异方面的相对表现。
Med Care. 2021 Oct 1;59(Suppl 5):S413-S419. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001612.
4
Finding Strength in Vulnerability: Ethical Approaches when Conducting Research with Vulnerable Populations.在脆弱中寻找力量:在对弱势群体进行研究时的伦理方法。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Nov;65(6):802-807. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13151. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
5
Factors that influence family and parental preferences and decision making for unscheduled paediatric healthcare - systematic review.影响非计划性儿科医疗保健的家庭和父母偏好及决策的因素——系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 17;20(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05527-5.
6
A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research.一种评估和报告定性研究主题饱和度的简单方法。
PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232076. eCollection 2020.
7
Systematic Review of Disparities in Care and Outcomes in Pediatric Appendectomy.系统评价小儿阑尾切除术的护理和结局差异。
J Surg Res. 2020 May;249:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.12.018. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
8
Perspective: Identifying and Addressing Disparities in Surgical Access: A Health Systems Call to Action.观点:识别并解决手术可及性方面的差异:医疗系统的行动呼吁。
Ann Surg. 2020 Mar;271(3):427-430. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003572.
9
Health Disparities in the Hospitalized Child.住院儿童的健康差异
Hosp Pediatr. 2019 May;9(5):317-325. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2018-0223. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
10
Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review.儿科共享决策的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2019 Jan 18;14(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0851-5.