Zhang Xin, Wang Song, Zheng Junyong, Xiao Xiao, Wang Hongyu, Peng Songlin
The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.
Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, China.
Asian Spine J. 2024 Jun;18(3):415-424. doi: 10.31616/asj.2023.0447. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
A retrospective cohort study.
This study aimed to assess the reliability of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in measuring bone mineral density (BMD) of instrumented vertebrae and investigate the effect of less paraspinal muscle damage on BMD changes after lumbar interbody fusion.
Patients always experience a decrease in vertebral BMD after lumbar interbody fusion. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has analyzed the effect of paraspinal muscles on BMD changes.
This retrospective analysis included a total of 155 patients who underwent single-level lumbar fusion, with 81 patients in the traditional group and 74 patients in the Wiltse group (less paraspinal muscle damage). QCT was used to measure the volumetric BMD (vBMD), Hounsfield unit value, and cross-sectional area of the paraspinal muscles at the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV), vertebrae one segment above the UIV (UIV+1), and the vertebrae one segment above the UIV+1 (UIV+2). Statistical analyses were performed.
No significant differences in general data were observed between the two groups (p>0.05). Strong correlations were noted between the preoperative and 1-week postoperative vBMD of each segment (p<0.01), with no significant difference between the two time points in both groups (p>0.05). Vertebral BMD loss was significantly higher in UIV+1 and UIV+2 in the traditional group than in the Wiltse group (-13.6%±19.1% vs. -4.2%±16.5%, -10.8%±20.3% vs. -0.9%±37.0%; p<0.05). However, no statistically significant difference was observed in the percent vBMD changes in the UIV segment between the two groups (37.7%±70.1% vs. 36.1%±78.7%, p>0.05).
QCT can reliably determine BMD in the instrumented spine after lumbar interbody fusion. With QCT, we found that reducing paraspinal muscle destruction through the Wiltse approach during surgery can help preserve the adjacent vertebral BMD; however, it does not help increase the BMD in the instrumented vertebrae.
一项回顾性队列研究。
本研究旨在评估定量计算机断层扫描(QCT)测量固定节段椎体骨密度(BMD)的可靠性,并探讨减少椎旁肌损伤对腰椎椎间融合术后骨密度变化的影响。
腰椎椎间融合术后患者的椎体骨密度总会下降。然而,据我们所知,尚无研究分析椎旁肌对骨密度变化的影响。
这项回顾性分析共纳入155例行单节段腰椎融合术的患者,其中传统组81例,Wiltse组74例(椎旁肌损伤较小)。采用QCT测量上位固定节段椎体(UIV)、UIV上方一个节段的椎体(UIV + 1)以及UIV + 1上方一个节段的椎体(UIV + 2)的骨密度(vBMD)、亨氏单位值和椎旁肌横截面积。进行统计学分析。
两组患者的一般资料无显著差异(p > 0.05)。各节段术前和术后1周的vBMD之间存在强相关性(p < 0.01),两组两个时间点之间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。传统组UIV + 1和UIV + 2的椎体骨密度丢失显著高于Wiltse组(-13.6%±19.1%对-4.2%±16.5%,-10.8%±20.3%对-0.9%±37.0%;p < 0.05)。然而,两组UIV节段的vBMD变化百分比无统计学显著差异(37.7%±70.1%对36.1%±78.7%,p > 0.05)。
QCT能够可靠地测定腰椎椎间融合术后固定节段脊柱的骨密度。通过QCT,我们发现术中采用Wiltse入路减少椎旁肌破坏有助于保留相邻椎体的骨密度;然而,这无助于增加固定节段椎体的骨密度。