• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Health Literacy in Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Quantitative Assessment of the Understandability and Readability of Online Patient Education Material.肩关镜手术中的健康素养:对在线患者教育材料的可理解性和可读性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(1):151-158.
2
Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Quantitative Assessment of Online Patient Education Resources.全膝关节置换术:在线患者教育资源的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2022;42(2):98-106.
3
Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.足踝畸形患者的健康素养:在线患者教育材料的可阅读性、可理解性和可操作性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):61-67.
4
Health literacy in rotator cuff repair: a quantitative assessment of the understandability of online patient education material.肩袖修复中的健康素养:在线患者教育材料可理解性的定量评估
JSES Int. 2023 Jul 17;7(6):2344-2348. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.06.016. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Can Patients Read, Understand, and Act on Online Resources for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery?患者能否阅读、理解并依据前交叉韧带手术的在线资源采取行动?
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jul 28;10(7):23259671221089977. doi: 10.1177/23259671221089977. eCollection 2022 Jul.
6
Web-Based Patient Educational Material on Osteosarcoma: Quantitative Assessment of Readability and Understandability.基于网络的骨肉瘤患者教育材料:可读性与可理解性的定量评估
JMIR Cancer. 2022 Mar 24;8(1):e25005. doi: 10.2196/25005.
7
Carpal Tunnel Surgery: Can Patients Read, Understand, and Act on Online Educational Resources?腕管综合征手术:患者能否阅读、理解和运用在线教育资源?
Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(1):47-58.
8
Patient Education Materials Found via Google Search for Shoulder Arthroscopy Are Written at Too-High of a Reading Level.通过谷歌搜索找到的肩部关节镜检查患者教育材料的阅读难度过高。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul 7;4(4):e1575-e1579. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.034. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
Understandability, actionability, and readability of online patient education materials about diabetes mellitus.糖尿病在线患者教育资料的可理解性、可操作性和可读性。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Jan 25;76(3):182-186. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxy021.
10
Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.评估关于儿童胸痛的在线资料的可读性、可理解性和质量。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Dec;179(12):1881-1891. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03772-8. Epub 2020 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining Health Literacy and Appropriateness of Commercially Developed Patient Education Materials for Adults Living With Diabetes on the U.S./Mexico Border.审视美国/墨西哥边境地区成年糖尿病患者商业开发的患者教育材料的健康素养及适宜性。
Clin Nurs Res. 2025 Jun;34(5):215-222. doi: 10.1177/10547738251343418. Epub 2025 May 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Regarding Shoulder Surgery: How Do Medical Institution Web Sites Rate?评估关于肩部手术的在线患者教育材料的可读性:医疗机构网站的评分如何?
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2019 Fall;28(3):209-214.
2
Sources of information used by patients prior to elective surgery: a scoping review.术前患者信息来源:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 5;9(8):e023080. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023080.
3
Assessing the Understandability and Actionability of Online Neurosurgical Patient Education Materials.评估在线神经外科学患者教育材料的易懂性和可操作性。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Oct;130:e588-e597. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.166. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
4
Readability, content, quality and accuracy assessment of internet-based patient education materials relating to labor analgesia.互联网上与分娩镇痛相关的患者教育材料的可读性、内容、质量和准确性评估。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 Aug;39:82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
5
Readability assessment of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons patient brochures with suggestions for improvement.美国肩肘外科医师协会患者宣传册的可读性评估及改进建议
JSES Open Access. 2018 Mar 22;2(2):150-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jses.2018.02.003. eCollection 2018 Jul.
6
Risk factors for admission after shoulder arthroscopy.肩关节镜术后住院的风险因素。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 May;28(5):882-887. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.09.031. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
7
Readibility, Understandability, and Quality of Online Education Materials for Vocal Fold Nodules.声带小结的在线教育材料的可读性、可理解性和质量。
J Voice. 2020 Mar;34(2):302.e15-302.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
8
Readability of Patient Educational Materials for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.全髋关节和膝关节置换术患者教育材料的可读性
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2018 Spring;27(1):72-76.
9
Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Arthroscopy-Related Online Patient Education Materials.最常访问的关节镜相关在线患者教育材料的可读性。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Apr;34(4):1272-1279. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.09.043. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
10
Incidence and Changing Trends of Shoulder Stabilization in the United States.美国肩部稳定术的发生率和变化趋势。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Mar;34(3):784-792. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.289. Epub 2017 Dec 8.

肩关镜手术中的健康素养:对在线患者教育材料的可理解性和可读性的定量评估。

Health Literacy in Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Quantitative Assessment of the Understandability and Readability of Online Patient Education Material.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Center for Sports Medicine and Orthopaedics, Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(1):151-158.

PMID:38919367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11195902/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) and American Medical Association (AMA) recommend that online health information be written at a maximum 6th grade reading level. The aim was to evaluate online resources regarding shoulder arthroscopy utilizing measures of readability, understandability, and actionability, using syntax reading grade level and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT-P).

METHODS

An online Google™ search utilizing "shoulder arthroscopy" was performed. From the top 50 results, websites directed at educating patients were included. News and scientific articles, audiovisual materials, industry websites, and unrelated materials were excluded. Readability was calculated using objective algorithms: Flesch-Kincaid Grade-Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) grade, Coleman-Liau Index (CLI), and Gunning-Fog Index (GFI). The PEMAT-P was used to assess understandability and actionability, with a 70% score threshold. Scores were compared across academic institutions, private practices, and commercial health publishers. The correlation between search rank and readability, understandability, and actionability was calculated.

RESULTS

Two independent searches yielded 53 websites, with 44 (83.02%) meeting inclusion criteria. No mean readability score performed below a 10th grade reading level. Only one website scored at or below 6th grade reading level. Mean understandability and actionability scores were 63.02%±12.09 and 29.77%±20.63, neither of which met the PEMAT threshold. Twelve (27.27%) websites met the understandability threshold, while none met the actionability threshold. Institution categories scored similarly in understandability (61.71%, 62.68%, 63.67%) among academic, private practice, and commercial health publishers respectively (p=0.9536). No readability or PEMAT score correlated with search rank.

CONCLUSION

Online shoulder arthroscopy patient education materials score poorly in readability, understandability, and actionability. One website scored at the NIH and AMA recommended reading level, and 27.27% of websites scored above the 70% PEMAT score for understandability. None met the actionability threshold. Future efforts should improve online resources to optimize patient education and facilitate informed decision-making. .

摘要

背景

美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)和美国医学协会(AMA)建议,在线健康信息的撰写应达到最高 6 年级阅读水平。其目的是利用可读性、可理解性和可操作性评估在线肩部关节镜资源,使用句法阅读年级水平和患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT-P)。

方法

利用“肩部关节镜”进行了在线谷歌搜索。从前 50 个结果中,选择了针对教育患者的网站。排除新闻和科学文章、视听材料、行业网站和不相关的材料。使用客观算法计算可读性:弗莱什-金凯德等级(FKGL)、简单的胡言乱语测量(SMOG)等级、科尔曼-廖指数(CLI)和冈宁-福格指数(GFI)。使用 PEMAT-P 评估可理解性和可操作性,以 70%的分数为阈值。比较了学术机构、私人诊所和商业健康出版商的分数。计算了搜索排名与可读性、可理解性和可操作性之间的相关性。

结果

两次独立搜索产生了 53 个网站,其中 44 个(83.02%)符合纳入标准。没有一个平均可读性得分低于 10 年级阅读水平。只有一个网站的得分达到或低于 6 年级阅读水平。平均可理解性和可操作性得分分别为 63.02%±12.09%和 29.77%±20.63%,均未达到 PEMAT 阈值。12 个(27.27%)网站达到了可理解性阈值,而没有一个达到可操作性阈值。学术、私人诊所和商业健康出版商的机构类别在可理解性方面的得分分别为 61.71%、62.68%和 63.67%(p=0.9536),相似。没有可读性或 PEMAT 评分与搜索排名相关。

结论

在线肩部关节镜患者教育材料在可读性、可理解性和可操作性方面得分较差。一个网站的得分达到 NIH 和 AMA 推荐的阅读水平,27.27%的网站的可理解性得分超过 PEMAT 的 70%阈值。没有一个符合可操作性阈值。未来的工作应努力改善在线资源,以优化患者教育并促进知情决策。