Abdullah Youssef, Alokozai Aaron, Mathew Abraham J, Stamm Michaela A, Mulcahey Mary K
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana; and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul 7;4(4):e1575-e1579. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.034. eCollection 2022 Aug.
To evaluate the quality and correlation of readability on actionability and understandability of shoulder arthroscopy-related patient education materials (PEMs) found via a routine Google search.
Two independent authors performed an online Google search with the term "shoulder arthroscopy." The first 5 pages of search results were then screened for PEMs. Journal articles, news articles, nontext materials, and unrelated websites were excluded. The readability of included resources was calculated using objective metrics: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Score, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook index, Coleman-Liau Index, and the Gunning Fog Index. Patient Education Material Assessment Tool for Printed Materials assessed for understandability and actionability. Associations between readability and actionability and understandability were determined using Spearman correlation and linear regression.
The searches returned 53 websites related to shoulder arthroscopy. A total of 34 (64%) met inclusion criteria. A high school reading level or greater was required to read the average PEM according to all scales used. The average PEM received a Patient Education Material Assessment Tool for Printed Materials score of 61.33 in understandability (range 18.75-89.47) and 55.59 points in actionability (range 16.67-83.33). An easily understood or actionable article would score at least 70 points. A moderate correlation was observed between readability and actionability on three of the scales used (r = 0.5, r = 0.59, r = 0.61).
Most shoulder arthroscopy PEMs identified on Google are not written at a level that the average patient can read, understand, or act on (actionability).
Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of the resources that patients use to obtain medical information. More accessible PEMs should be developed for patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy to enhance comprehension of their condition and improve shared decision-making.
评估通过常规谷歌搜索找到的肩关节镜检查相关患者教育材料(PEMs)的质量以及可读性与可操作性和易懂性之间的相关性。
两位独立作者使用“肩关节镜检查”一词进行在线谷歌搜索。然后对搜索结果的前5页进行PEMs筛选。排除期刊文章、新闻文章、非文本材料和不相关网站。使用客观指标计算纳入资源的可读性:弗莱施-金凯德年级水平得分、难词简易衡量指数、科尔曼-廖指数和冈宁雾指数。使用印刷材料患者教育材料评估工具评估易懂性和可操作性。使用斯皮尔曼相关性和线性回归确定可读性与可操作性和易懂性之间的关联。
搜索返回了53个与肩关节镜检查相关的网站。共有34个(64%)符合纳入标准。根据所有使用的量表,阅读平均PEM需要高中及以上阅读水平。平均PEM在易懂性方面的印刷材料患者教育材料评估工具得分为61.33(范围18.75 - 89.47),在可操作性方面得分为55.59分(范围16.67 - 83.33)。一篇易于理解或可操作的文章得分至少应为70分。在所使用的三个量表上,可读性与可操作性之间观察到中等相关性(r = 0.5,r = 0.59,r = 0.61)。
在谷歌上找到的大多数肩关节镜检查PEMs的编写水平并非普通患者能够阅读、理解或据此采取行动(可操作性)的水平。
骨科医生应了解患者获取医疗信息所使用的资源。应为接受肩关节镜检查的患者开发更易获取的PEMs,以增强他们对自身病情的理解并改善共同决策。