Beckmann Jens F, Birney Damian P, Sternberg Robert J
School of Education, Durham University, Durham DH1 1TA, UK.
School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.
J Intell. 2024 Jun 11;12(6):61. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12060061.
A successful adjustment to dynamic changes in one's environment requires contingent adaptive behaviour. Such behaviour is underpinned by cognitive flexibility, which conceptually is part of fluid intelligence. We argue, however, that conventional approaches to measuring fluid intelligence are insufficient in capturing cognitive flexibility. We address the discrepancy between conceptualisation and operationalisation by introducing two newly developed tasks that aim at capturing within-person processes of dealing with novelty. In an exploratory proof-of-concept study, the two flexibility tasks were administered to 307 university students, together with a battery of conventional measures of fluid intelligence. Participants also provided information about their Grade Point Averages obtained in high school and in their first year at university. We tested (1) whether an experimental manipulation of a requirement for cognitive inhibition resulted in systematic differences in difficulty, (2) whether these complexity differences reflect psychometrically differentiable effects, and (3) whether these newly developed flexibility tasks show incremental value in predicting success in the transition from high school to university over conventional operationalisations of fluid intelligence. Our findings support the notion that cognitive flexibility, when conceptualised and operationalised as individual differences in within-person processes of dealing with novelty, more appropriately reflects the dynamics of individuals' behaviour when attempting to cope with changing demands.
成功适应环境的动态变化需要有应变的适应性行为。这种行为以认知灵活性为基础,从概念上讲,认知灵活性是流体智力的一部分。然而,我们认为,传统的测量流体智力的方法不足以捕捉认知灵活性。我们通过引入两项新开发的任务来解决概念化与操作化之间的差异,这两项任务旨在捕捉个体处理新事物的过程。在一项探索性的概念验证研究中,我们对307名大学生进行了这两项灵活性任务测试,并同时进行了一系列传统的流体智力测量。参与者还提供了他们在高中和大学一年级时的平均绩点信息。我们测试了:(1)对认知抑制要求的实验性操作是否会导致难度上的系统性差异;(2)这些复杂性差异是否反映了心理测量学上可区分的效应;(3)与传统的流体智力操作化方法相比,这些新开发的灵活性任务在预测从高中到大学过渡阶段的成功方面是否具有增量价值。我们的研究结果支持这样一种观点,即当将认知灵活性概念化为个体处理新事物过程中的个体差异并进行操作化时,它能更恰当地反映个体在试图应对不断变化的需求时行为的动态变化。