Suppr超能文献

不同速度损失对短跑运动员激活后表现增强(PAPE)效应的影响:一项初步随机对照研究。

The Impact of Different Velocity Losses on Post-Activation Performance Enhancement (PAPE) Effects in Sprint Athletes: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study.

作者信息

Li Liang, Mo Ling, Liu Yanxu, Mei Tao

机构信息

China Institute of Sport and Health Science, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China.

Faculty of Sport Science and Coaching, Sultan Idris Education University, Tanjung Malin 35900, Malaysia.

出版信息

Sports (Basel). 2024 Jun 6;12(6):157. doi: 10.3390/sports12060157.

Abstract

Post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) can significantly improve athletic performance. This study investigated the effects of two different velocity loss (10% VL and 20% VL) protocols on PAPE in 20 m sprint performance among sprint athletes. Twenty-four male sprint athletes (100 m sprint time: 10.96 ± 0.15 s) participated in the study. A randomized crossover experimental design was used to compare the traditional group (TG) and 10% VL and 20% VL interventions. Sprint tests were conducted at 4, 8, 12, and 16 min post-intervention. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant interaction effect between group and time on 20 m sprint performance (F = 2.817, = 0.037, partial η = 0.585). Simple main effects analysis revealed significant improvements at 4 min for the 20% VL group ( < 0.05). Cohen's d values indicated improvements in 10 m sprint times at 8 min for all groups (TG: effect size (ES) = -0.270, 10% VL: ES = -0.038, 20% VL: ES = -0.279). Improvements in 20 m sprint times were observed at 4 min for the 20% VL group (ES = -0.296) and at 16 min for the 10% VL group (ES = -0.276). In conclusion, the velocity loss-based PAPE protocol (20% VL) demonstrated a superior induction of PAPE effects in sprint athletes at 4 min compared to traditional 1RM-based PAPE protocols. However, no significant differences were observed between the two protocols at 8, 12, and 16 min.

摘要

激活后表现增强(PAPE)可显著提高运动成绩。本研究调查了两种不同速度损失(10%VL和20%VL)方案对短跑运动员20米短跑成绩中PAPE的影响。24名男性短跑运动员(100米短跑时间:10.96±0.15秒)参与了该研究。采用随机交叉实验设计比较传统组(TG)以及10%VL和20%VL干预组。在干预后4、8、12和16分钟进行短跑测试。双向重复测量方差分析显示,组间和时间对20米短跑成绩有显著交互作用(F = 2.817,P = 0.037,偏η² = 0.585)。简单主效应分析显示,20%VL组在4分钟时成绩有显著提高(P < 0.05)。科恩d值表明,所有组在8分钟时10米短跑时间均有改善(TG:效应量(ES)=-0.270,10%VL:ES = -0.038,20%VL:ES = -0.279)。20%VL组在4分钟时20米短跑时间有改善(ES = -0.296),10%VL组在16分钟时20米短跑时间有改善(ES = -0.276)。总之,与传统的基于1RM的PAPE方案相比,基于速度损失的PAPE方案(20%VL)在4分钟时对短跑运动员PAPE效应的诱导效果更佳。然而,在8、12和16分钟时,两种方案之间未观察到显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4393/11207782/cf16af8939d8/sports-12-00157-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验