The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Osteoporosis Research Institute of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
The Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Endocrine. 2024 Sep;85(3):1100-1103. doi: 10.1007/s12020-024-03926-w. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
Fracture risk in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients is paradoxically increased despite no decrease in areal bone mineral density (BMD). This phenomenon, known as the "diabetic bone paradox", has been attributed to various factors including alterations in bone microarchitecture and composition, hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia, advanced glycation end products (AGEs), and comorbidities associated with T2D. Zhao et al. recently investigated the relationship between T2D and fracture risk using both genetic and phenotypic datasets. Their findings suggest that genetically predicted T2D is associated with higher BMD and lower fracture risk, indicating that the bone paradox is not observed when confounding factors are controlled using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. However, in prospective phenotypic analysis, T2D remained associated with higher BMD and higher fracture risk, even after adjusting for confounding factors. Stratified analysis revealed that the bone paradox may disappear when T2D-related risk factors are eliminated. The study also highlighted the role of obesity in the relationship between T2D and fracture risk, with BMI mediating a significant portion of the protective effect. Overall, managing T2D-related risk factors may be crucial in preventing fracture risk in T2D patients.
2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的骨折风险尽管并未降低,但出人意料地增加了。这种现象被称为“糖尿病骨悖论”,归因于多种因素,包括骨微结构和成分的改变、高胰岛素血症和高血糖、晚期糖基化终产物(AGEs)以及与 T2D 相关的合并症。Zhao 等人最近使用遗传和表型数据集研究了 T2D 与骨折风险之间的关系。他们的研究结果表明,遗传预测的 T2D 与更高的骨密度和更低的骨折风险相关,这表明在使用孟德尔随机化(MR)分析控制混杂因素时,并未观察到骨悖论。然而,在前瞻性表型分析中,即使调整了混杂因素,T2D 仍与更高的骨密度和更高的骨折风险相关。分层分析表明,当消除与 T2D 相关的危险因素时,骨悖论可能会消失。该研究还强调了肥胖在 T2D 与骨折风险之间关系中的作用,BMI 介导了保护作用的很大一部分。总的来说,管理与 T2D 相关的危险因素可能是预防 T2D 患者骨折风险的关键。