Di Monaco Marco, Castiglioni Carlotta, Bardesono Francesca, Minetto Marco A, Busso Chiara, Massazza Giuseppe
Division of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Osteoporosis Research Center, Presidio Sanitario San Camillo, Opera San Camillo Foundation, Turin, Italy -
Division of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Osteoporosis Research Center, Presidio Sanitario San Camillo, Opera San Camillo Foundation, Turin, Italy.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2025 Jun;61(3):543-550. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.25.08894-X. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have enhanced fracture risk despite high bone mineral density (BMD), a phenomenon known as the diabetic bone paradox. Consistently with the paradox, hip fractures occur at higher BMD in women with T2DM than in controls. However, no studies have addressed BMD in women with T2DM who have prevalent vertebral fractures at the time of their first hip fracture.
The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that BMD levels could be higher in the hip-fracture women with versus without T2DM in the absence but not in the presence of prevalent vertebral fractures.
This was a cross-sectional study.
The research took place in a rehabilitation ward.
The study involved women who were undergoing inpatient rehabilitation following a subacute hip fracture.
We investigated hip-fracture women with and without prevalent vertebral fractures, consecutively admitted to our rehabilitation ward. At a median of 19 days after the hip fracture we assessed femoral BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and prevalent vertebral fractures by X-ray examination.
The study sample included 504 women. One hundred eighty-five of the 504 had no vertebral fractures whereas 319 had at least one spine fracture. The 185 women without vertebral fractures had BMD higher in the presence (N.=29) than in the absence (N.=156) of T2DM (mean T-score difference was 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) from 0.31 to 1.03, P<0.001). After adjustment for 8 potential confounders, the odds ratio to have densitometric osteoporosis for a woman without T2DM was 3.21 (95% CI from 1.10 to 9.33, P=0.032). On the contrary, in the 319 women with vertebral fractures T2DM was not associated with BMD.
At the time of an original hip fracture, we found a BMD gap between women with and without T2DM in the absence but not in the presence of prevalent vertebral fractures.
Adjustments of fracture risk calculation in T2DM have been authoritatively suggested, because high BMD levels may falsely lead to risk underestimation. Our data suggests that no adjustments may be needed for the risk estimation in patients with prevalent vertebral fractures. Further data from longitudinal studies are needed to define the role of both prevalent vertebral fractures and BMD in fracture risk of patients with T2DM.
2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者尽管骨矿物质密度(BMD)较高,但骨折风险仍有所增加,这一现象被称为糖尿病骨悖论。与该悖论一致的是,T2DM女性发生髋部骨折时的BMD高于对照组。然而,尚无研究探讨首次发生髋部骨折时已存在椎体骨折的T2DM女性的BMD情况。
本研究旨在验证以下假设:在不存在而非存在椎体骨折的情况下,发生髋部骨折的女性中,患有T2DM者的BMD水平可能高于未患T2DM者。
这是一项横断面研究。
研究在一个康复病房进行。
该研究纳入了因亚急性髋部骨折正在接受住院康复治疗的女性。
我们对连续入住我们康复病房的有和没有椎体骨折的髋部骨折女性进行了调查。在髋部骨折后中位19天时,我们通过双能X线吸收法评估股骨BMD,并通过X线检查评估椎体骨折情况。
研究样本包括504名女性。504名中有185名没有椎体骨折,而319名至少有一处椎体骨折。185名没有椎体骨折的女性中,患有T2DM者(N = 29)的BMD高于未患T2DM者(N = 156)(平均T值差异为0.67,95%置信区间(CI)为0.31至1.03,P < 0.001)。在对八个潜在混杂因素进行调整后,未患T2DM的女性发生密度测定骨质疏松症的比值比为3.21(95%CI为1.10至9.33,P = 0.032)。相反,在319名有椎体骨折的女性中,T2DM与BMD无关。
在初次发生髋部骨折时,我们发现不存在而非存在椎体骨折的情况下,患有和未患T2DM的女性之间存在BMD差距。
权威人士已建议调整T2DM患者骨折风险的计算,因为高BMD水平可能会错误地导致风险低估。我们的数据表明,对于已存在椎体骨折的患者,风险评估可能无需调整。需要纵向研究的进一步数据来确定已存在椎体骨折和BMD在T2DM患者骨折风险中的作用。