• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Individual differences in sharing false political information on social media: Deliberate and accidental sharing, motivations and positive schizotypy.社交媒体上分享虚假政治信息的个体差异:有意和无意分享、动机和积极的精神分裂特质。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 26;19(6):e0304855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304855. eCollection 2024.
2
Why do people spread false information online? The effects of message and viewer characteristics on self-reported likelihood of sharing social media disinformation.为什么人们会在网上传播虚假信息?信息和观众特征对自我报告的社交媒体虚假信息分享可能性的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239666. eCollection 2020.
3
Sharing of misinformation is habitual, not just lazy or biased.错误信息的分享是习惯性的,不仅仅是因为懒惰或偏见。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jan 24;120(4):e2216614120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2216614120. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
4
Who shares fake news on social media? Evidence from vaccines and infertility claims in sub-Saharan Africa.谁在社交媒体上分享虚假新闻?来自撒哈拉以南非洲疫苗和不孕声称的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 9;19(4):e0301818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301818. eCollection 2024.
5
Changing the incentive structure of social media platforms to halt the spread of misinformation.改变社交媒体平台的激励结构以阻止错误信息的传播。
Elife. 2023 Jun 6;12:e85767. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85767.
6
[Mis- and disinformation in social media: mitigating risks in digital health communication].[社交媒体中的错误信息和虚假信息:减轻数字健康传播中的风险]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Mar;67(3):300-307. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03836-2. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
7
Self-certification: A novel method for increasing sharing discernment on social media.自我认证:一种提高社交媒体共享识别能力的新方法。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 11;19(6):e0303025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303025. eCollection 2024.
8
Mitigating the influence of message features on health misinformation sharing intention in social media: Experimental evidence for accuracy-nudge intervention.减轻社交媒体中信息特征对健康错误信息分享意愿的影响:准确性提示干预的实验证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Sep;356:117136. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117136. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
9
Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online.将注意力转移到准确性上可以减少网络上的错误信息。
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7855):590-595. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
10
Users' unverified information-sharing behavior on social media: The role of reasoned and social reactive pathways.用户在社交媒体上未经证实的信息分享行为:理性与社会反应路径的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 May;245:104215. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104215. Epub 2024 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
On the Efficacy of Accuracy Prompts Across Partisan Lines: An Adversarial Collaboration.在跨党派准确性提示的功效上:对抗性协作。
Psychol Sci. 2024 Apr;35(4):435-450. doi: 10.1177/09567976241232905. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
2
Repetition could increase the perceived truth of conspiracy theories.重复可能会增加阴谋论的可信度。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Dec;30(6):2397-2406. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02276-4. Epub 2023 May 23.
3
Ability of detecting and willingness to share fake news.检测和分享假新闻的能力。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 5;13(1):7298. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34402-6.
4
Moral leniency towards belief-consistent disinformation may help explain its spread on social media.对与信仰一致的虚假信息持道德宽容态度,可能有助于解释其在社交媒体上的传播。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0281777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281777. eCollection 2023.
5
Designing for fake news literacy training: A problem-based undergraduate online-course.为虚假新闻素养培训设计:一门基于问题的本科在线课程。
Comput Human Behav. 2021 Aug;121:106796. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106796. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
6
Of pandemics, politics, and personality: The role of conscientiousness and political ideology in the sharing of fake news.论大流行病、政治和人格:尽责性和政治意识形态在假新闻传播中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 May;151(5):1154-1177. doi: 10.1037/xge0001120. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
7
Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online.将注意力转移到准确性上可以减少网络上的错误信息。
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7855):590-595. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
8
Some people just want to watch the world burn: the prevalence, psychology and politics of the 'Need for Chaos'.有些人就是想看世界毁灭:“混沌需求”的普遍性、心理和政治。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 12;376(1822):20200147. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0147. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
9
Why do people spread false information online? The effects of message and viewer characteristics on self-reported likelihood of sharing social media disinformation.为什么人们会在网上传播虚假信息?信息和观众特征对自我报告的社交媒体虚假信息分享可能性的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239666. eCollection 2020.
10
Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention.社交媒体上抗击 COVID-19 错误信息:可扩展的准确性提示干预的实验证据。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jul;31(7):770-780. doi: 10.1177/0956797620939054. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

社交媒体上分享虚假政治信息的个体差异:有意和无意分享、动机和积极的精神分裂特质。

Individual differences in sharing false political information on social media: Deliberate and accidental sharing, motivations and positive schizotypy.

机构信息

School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom.

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Sussex, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jun 26;19(6):e0304855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304855. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0304855
PMID:38923942
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11206957/
Abstract

False political information-misinformation or disinformation-is widely spread on social media. Individual social media users play a large part in this. However, only a minority actively share false material. It is important to establish what sets these individuals apart from those who do not, and why they do it. Motivations for sharing may vary and are likely to differ between people who share false material unknowingly and on purpose. In this paper we consider the extent to which individual differences in personality and other variables, and motivations for sharing, are associated with the likelihood of people sharing false political information both accidentally and deliberately. In a series of four studies (Ns = 614, 563, 627, 113) we examined predictors of sharing false political information using different methodological approaches. Across the four studies, a key finding was that positive schizotypy is associated with measures of sharing false information both accidentally and deliberately. Motivations for sharing political information online were also relevant, with sharing for reasons of 'raising awareness' appearing particularly important. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

摘要

虚假政治信息——错误信息或误导性信息——在社交媒体上广泛传播。社交媒体用户个人在这方面起着重要作用。然而,只有少数人会主动分享虚假材料。重要的是要确定这些人与不分享虚假材料的人有何不同,以及他们为什么要这样做。分享的动机可能因人而异,而且在无意中分享和故意分享虚假材料的人之间可能存在差异。在本文中,我们考虑了个体差异在人格和其他变量方面,以及分享动机与人们偶然和故意分享虚假政治信息的可能性之间的关联程度。在四项研究中(N=614、563、627、113),我们使用不同的方法学方法来研究分享虚假政治信息的预测因素。在四项研究中,一个关键发现是积极的精神分裂症与偶然和故意分享虚假信息的衡量标准有关。在网上分享政治信息的动机也很重要,“提高意识”的分享动机尤为重要。本文讨论了对研究和实践的影响。