School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom.
School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Sussex, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 26;19(6):e0304855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304855. eCollection 2024.
False political information-misinformation or disinformation-is widely spread on social media. Individual social media users play a large part in this. However, only a minority actively share false material. It is important to establish what sets these individuals apart from those who do not, and why they do it. Motivations for sharing may vary and are likely to differ between people who share false material unknowingly and on purpose. In this paper we consider the extent to which individual differences in personality and other variables, and motivations for sharing, are associated with the likelihood of people sharing false political information both accidentally and deliberately. In a series of four studies (Ns = 614, 563, 627, 113) we examined predictors of sharing false political information using different methodological approaches. Across the four studies, a key finding was that positive schizotypy is associated with measures of sharing false information both accidentally and deliberately. Motivations for sharing political information online were also relevant, with sharing for reasons of 'raising awareness' appearing particularly important. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
虚假政治信息——错误信息或误导性信息——在社交媒体上广泛传播。社交媒体用户个人在这方面起着重要作用。然而,只有少数人会主动分享虚假材料。重要的是要确定这些人与不分享虚假材料的人有何不同,以及他们为什么要这样做。分享的动机可能因人而异,而且在无意中分享和故意分享虚假材料的人之间可能存在差异。在本文中,我们考虑了个体差异在人格和其他变量方面,以及分享动机与人们偶然和故意分享虚假政治信息的可能性之间的关联程度。在四项研究中(N=614、563、627、113),我们使用不同的方法学方法来研究分享虚假政治信息的预测因素。在四项研究中,一个关键发现是积极的精神分裂症与偶然和故意分享虚假信息的衡量标准有关。在网上分享政治信息的动机也很重要,“提高意识”的分享动机尤为重要。本文讨论了对研究和实践的影响。