AO Research Institute Davos, 7270 Davos, Switzerland.
Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Uri, 6460 Altdorf, Switzerland.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 22;60(6):844. doi: 10.3390/medicina60060844.
: Despite the established role of subtalar joint arthrodesis (SJA) for treatment of subtalar osteoarthritis, achieving bone union remains challenging, with up to 46% non-union rates. Adequate compression and stable fixation are crucial for successful outcomes, with internal screw fixation being the gold standard for SJA. The delta configuration, featuring highly divergent screws, offers stability, however, it can result in hardware irritation in 20-30% of patients. Solutions to solve this complication include cannulated compression screw (CCS) countersinking or cannulated compression headless screw (CCHS) application. The aim of this biomechanical study was to investigate the stability of a delta configuration for SJA utilizing either a combination of a posterior CCHS and an anterior CCS or a standard two-CCS combination. : Twelve paired human cadaveric lower legs were assigned pairwise to two groups for SJA using either two CCSs (Group 1) or one posterior CCHS and one anterior CCS (Group 2). All specimens were tested under progressively increasing cyclic loading to failure, with monitoring of the talocalcaneal movements via motion tracking. : Initial stiffness did not differ significantly between the groups, = 0.949. Talocalcaneal movements in terms of varus-valgus deformation and internal-external rotation were significantly bigger in Group 1 versus Group 2, ≤ 0.026. Number of cycles until reaching 5° varus-valgus deformation was significantly higher in Group 2 versus Group 1, = 0.029. : A delta-configuration SJA utilizing a posterior CCHS and an anterior CCS is biomechanically superior versus a standard configuration with two CCSs. Clinically, the use of a posterior CCHS could prevent protrusion of the hardware in the heel, while an anterior CCS could facilitate less surgical time and thus less complication rates.
: 尽管距下关节融合术(SJA)已被确立为治疗距下关节炎的方法,但实现骨融合仍然具有挑战性,不愈合率高达 46%。充分的压缩和稳定的固定对于获得成功的结果至关重要,内置螺钉固定是 SJA 的金标准。Delta 构型采用高度发散的螺钉,具有稳定性,但 20-30%的患者会出现硬件刺激的问题。解决此并发症的方法包括使用空心加压螺钉(CCS)埋头或使用空心无头加压螺钉(CCHS)。本生物力学研究的目的是研究使用后部 CCHS 和前部 CCS 的组合或标准的两个 CCS 组合的 SJA 的 Delta 构型的稳定性。: 12 对配对的人类尸体小腿被分配到两个 SJA 组,每组使用两个 CCS(组 1)或一个后部 CCHS 和一个前部 CCS(组 2)。所有标本均在逐渐增加的循环加载直至失效的情况下进行测试,通过运动跟踪监测距跟骨的运动。: 两组之间的初始刚度没有显著差异, = 0.949。在组 1 中,距跟骨的内翻-外翻变形和内外旋转运动明显大于组 2, ≤ 0.026。达到 5°内翻-外翻变形的循环数在组 2 中明显高于组 1, = 0.029。: 与标准的两个 CCS 构型相比,使用后部 CCHS 和前部 CCS 的 Delta 构型的 SJA 在生物力学上更优越。在临床上,后部 CCHS 的使用可以防止硬件在脚跟处突出,而前部 CCS 可以减少手术时间,从而降低并发症的发生率。