Suppr超能文献

常规腹腔镜手术与机器人辅助腹腔镜手术中的人机工程学比较研究。

Comparative Study of Ergonomics in Conventional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery.

机构信息

Bioengineering and Health Technologies Unit, Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, ES-10004 Cáceres, Spain.

Scientific Direction, Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, ES-10004 Cáceres, Spain.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 14;24(12):3840. doi: 10.3390/s24123840.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to implement a set of wearable technologies to record and analyze the surgeon's physiological and ergonomic parameters during the performance of conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery, comparing the ergonomics and stress levels of surgeons during surgical procedures.

METHODS

This study was organized in two different settings: simulator tasks and experimental model surgical procedures. The participating surgeons performed the tasks and surgical procedures in both laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery in a randomized fashion. Different wearable technologies were used to record the surgeons' posture, muscle activity, electrodermal activity and electrocardiography signal during the surgical practice.

RESULTS

The simulator study involved six surgeons: three experienced (>100 laparoscopic procedures performed; 36.33 ± 13.65 years old) and three novices (<100 laparoscopic procedures; 29.33 ± 8.39 years old). Three surgeons of different surgical specialties with experience in laparoscopic surgery (>100 laparoscopic procedures performed; 37.00 ± 5.29 years old), but without experience in surgical robotics, participated in the experimental model study. The participating surgeons showed an increased level of stress during the robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Overall, improved surgeon posture was obtained during robotic-assisted surgery, with a reduction in localized muscle fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

A set of wearable technologies was implemented to measure and analyze surgeon physiological and ergonomic parameters. Robotic-assisted procedures showed better ergonomic outcomes for the surgeon compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery. Ergonomic analysis allows us to optimize surgeon performance and improve surgical training.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在使用一套可穿戴技术来记录和分析外科医生在进行传统腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助腹腔镜手术时的生理和人体工程学参数,比较外科医生在手术过程中的人体工程学和压力水平。

方法

本研究分为两个不同的设置:模拟器任务和实验模型手术程序。参与研究的外科医生以随机的方式在腹腔镜和机器人辅助手术中执行这些任务和手术程序。使用不同的可穿戴技术来记录外科医生在手术过程中的姿势、肌肉活动、皮肤电活动和心电图信号。

结果

模拟器研究涉及六名外科医生:三名经验丰富的(>100 例腹腔镜手术;36.33 ± 13.65 岁)和三名新手(<100 例腹腔镜手术;29.33 ± 8.39 岁)。三名具有腹腔镜手术经验(>100 例腹腔镜手术;37.00 ± 5.29 岁)但没有机器人手术经验的不同外科专业的外科医生参加了实验模型研究。参与研究的外科医生在机器人辅助手术过程中表现出更高的压力水平。总体而言,与传统腹腔镜手术相比,机器人辅助手术获得了更好的外科医生姿势,减少了局部肌肉疲劳。

结论

本研究实施了一套可穿戴技术来测量和分析外科医生的生理和人体工程学参数。与传统腹腔镜手术相比,机器人辅助手术为外科医生提供了更好的人体工程学效果。人体工程学分析可以优化外科医生的表现并改善手术培训。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ea/11207857/5bc29d1377bf/sensors-24-03840-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验