Montreal University Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada.
Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada.
Dig Endosc. 2024 Nov;36(11):1253-1268. doi: 10.1111/den.14826. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
There have been significant advances in the management of large (≥20 mm) laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) or nonpedunculated colorectal polyps; however, there is a lack of clear consensus on the management of these lesions with significant geographic variability especially between Eastern and Western paradigms. We aimed to provide an international consensus to better guide management and attempt to homogenize practices.
Two experts in interventional endoscopy spearheaded an evidence-based Delphi study on behalf of the World Endoscopy Organization Colorectal Cancer Screening Committee. A steering committee comprising six members devised 51 statements, and 43 experts from 18 countries on six continents participated in a three-round voting process. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations tool was used to assess evidence quality and recommendation strength. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement (strongly agree or agree) on a 5-point Likert scale.
Forty-two statements reached consensus after three rounds of voting. Recommendations included: three statements on training and competency; 10 statements on preresection evaluation, including optical diagnosis, classification, and staging of LSTs; 14 statements on endoscopic resection indications and technique, including statements on en bloc and piecemeal resection decision-making; seven statements on postresection evaluation; and eight statements on postresection care.
An international expert consensus based on the current available evidence has been developed to guide the evaluation, resection, and follow-up of LSTs. This may provide guiding principles for the global management of these lesions and standardize current practices.
在大型(≥20mm)侧向伸展肿瘤(LST)或无柄结直肠息肉的治疗方面已经取得了显著进展;然而,对于这些具有显著地理变异性的病变(尤其是在东西方模式之间)的管理,缺乏明确的共识。我们旨在提供国际共识,以更好地指导管理并尝试统一实践。
两位介入内镜专家代表世界内镜组织结直肠癌筛查委员会牵头进行了一项基于证据的德尔菲研究。一个由六名成员组成的指导委员会制定了 51 条陈述,来自六大洲 18 个国家的 43 名专家参与了三轮投票过程。使用推荐分级、评估、发展和评估工具(Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations tool)来评估证据质量和推荐强度。共识定义为在 5 分李克特量表上≥80%的一致性(非常同意或同意)。
经过三轮投票,42 条陈述达成共识。建议包括:三条关于培训和能力的陈述;10 条关于术前评估的陈述,包括 LST 的光学诊断、分类和分期;14 条关于内镜切除适应证和技术的陈述,包括整块和分片切除决策的陈述;7 条关于术后评估的陈述;以及 8 条关于术后护理的陈述。
基于现有证据制定了一项国际专家共识,以指导 LST 的评估、切除和随访。这可能为全球管理这些病变提供指导原则,并规范当前的实践。