• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经合组织国家化石燃料补贴改革的政治经济理论

A political economy theory of fossil fuel subsidy reforms in OECD countries.

作者信息

Droste Nils, Chatterton Benjamin, Skovgaard Jakob

机构信息

Department of Political Science and Centre for Innovation Research, Lund University, Box 117, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.

Department of Economic History, Lund University, Box 117, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2024 Jun 27;15(1):5452. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49835-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-49835-4
PMID:38937481
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11211386/
Abstract

Fossil fuel subsidies continue to be a considerable barrier to meeting the targets of the Paris Agreement. It is thus crucial to understand the political economy of fossil fuel subsidies and their reform. To understand these mechanisms in the developed world, we use a database of different types of fossil fuel subsidy reforms among Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. We find evidence for four intertwined processes i) a market-power mechanism: higher market shares for renewables ease fossil fuel subsidy reforms, and ii) a policy mechanism: reforms reduce the levels of fossil fuel subsidies. Importantly, both effects are contingent on iii) a polity mechanism where institutional quality influences the feasibility and effectiveness of political reforms, and iv) a feedback mechanism where systemic lock-ins determine the effectiveness of market competition. Our results even suggest that reforms carried out by effective governments with low corruption control are associated with increasing subsidies per capita. Renewable energy support can however provide a leverage point to break path-dependencies in fossil fuel-based economies. This turns out to be more effective when coupled with improvements to institutional quality and the insulation of political processes from pro-subsidy interests.

摘要

化石燃料补贴仍然是实现《巴黎协定》目标的重大障碍。因此,了解化石燃料补贴的政治经济学及其改革至关重要。为了理解发达国家的这些机制,我们使用了经济合作与发展组织(经合组织)国家不同类型化石燃料补贴改革的数据库。我们发现了四个相互交织的过程的证据:一)市场力量机制:可再生能源更高的市场份额推动了化石燃料补贴改革;二)政策机制:改革降低了化石燃料补贴水平。重要的是,这两种效应都取决于三)政治体制机制,即制度质量影响政治改革的可行性和有效性;四)反馈机制,即系统锁定决定市场竞争的有效性。我们的结果甚至表明,由腐败控制不力的有效政府进行的改革与人均补贴增加有关。然而,可再生能源支持可以提供一个杠杆点,以打破基于化石燃料的经济体中的路径依赖。当与制度质量的改善以及政治进程与支持补贴利益的隔绝相结合时,这一点会变得更加有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/11211386/7e6f565abfd4/41467_2024_49835_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/11211386/34419e27e84d/41467_2024_49835_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/11211386/0427969d427d/41467_2024_49835_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/11211386/3d14a411f52e/41467_2024_49835_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/11211386/a88e7d8b3aac/41467_2024_49835_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/11211386/380df3fd1281/41467_2024_49835_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/11211386/6546933ca4f4/41467_2024_49835_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/11211386/d112b86fbb02/41467_2024_49835_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/11211386/7e6f565abfd4/41467_2024_49835_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/11211386/34419e27e84d/41467_2024_49835_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/11211386/0427969d427d/41467_2024_49835_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/11211386/3d14a411f52e/41467_2024_49835_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/11211386/a88e7d8b3aac/41467_2024_49835_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/11211386/380df3fd1281/41467_2024_49835_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/11211386/6546933ca4f4/41467_2024_49835_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/11211386/d112b86fbb02/41467_2024_49835_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/11211386/7e6f565abfd4/41467_2024_49835_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A political economy theory of fossil fuel subsidy reforms in OECD countries.经合组织国家化石燃料补贴改革的政治经济理论
Nat Commun. 2024 Jun 27;15(1):5452. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49835-4.
2
Credibility dilemmas under the Paris agreement: explaining fossil fuel subsidy reform references in INDCs.《巴黎协定》下的可信度困境:解读国家自主贡献中的化石燃料补贴改革内容
Int Environ Agreem. 2022;22(4):735-759. doi: 10.1007/s10784-022-09581-8. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
3
Political leadership has limited impact on fossil fuel taxes and subsidies.政治领导力对化石燃料税和补贴的影响有限。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 22;119(47):e2208024119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2208024119. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
4
Author Correction: A political economy theory of fossil fuel subsidy reforms in OECD countries.作者更正:经合组织国家化石燃料补贴改革的政治经济理论
Nat Commun. 2024 Aug 1;15(1):6489. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51013-5.
5
Limited emission reductions from fuel subsidy removal except in energy-exporting regions.除非在能源出口地区,否则减少燃料补贴的排放有限。
Nature. 2018 Feb 7;554(7691):229-233. doi: 10.1038/nature25467.
6
Decarbonizing energy: Evaluating fossil fuel displacement by renewables in OECD countries.能源脱碳:评估经合组织国家可再生能源对化石燃料的替代作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 May;31(21):31304-31313. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33324-8. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
7
Prioritize carbon pricing over fossil-fuel subsidy reform.将碳定价置于化石燃料补贴改革之上。
iScience. 2023 Nov 25;27(1):108584. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108584. eCollection 2024 Jan 19.
8
Fuel subsidy reform and the social contract in Nigeria: A micro-economic analysis.尼日利亚的燃油补贴改革与社会契约:微观经济分析
Energy Policy. 2021 Sep;156:None. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112336.
9
The SDGs and fossil fuel subsidy reform.可持续发展目标与化石燃料补贴改革。
Int Environ Agreem. 2023 May 12:1-7. doi: 10.1007/s10784-023-09601-1.
10
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.公共部门改革及其对腐败程度的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Political leadership has limited impact on fossil fuel taxes and subsidies.政治领导力对化石燃料税和补贴的影响有限。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 22;119(47):e2208024119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2208024119. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
2
Why fossil fuel subsidies are so hard to kill.为何化石燃料补贴如此难以消除。
Nature. 2021 Oct;598(7881):403-405. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-02847-2.
3
Causal graphical views of fixed effects and random effects models.固定效应模型和随机效应模型的因果图形视图。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2021 May;74(2):165-183. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12217. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
4
Sustainable natural resource governance under interest group competition in policy-making.政策制定中利益集团竞争下的可持续自然资源治理。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):898-909. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0885-y. Epub 2020 May 25.
5
Why fossil fuel producer subsidies matter.为什么化石燃料生产商补贴很重要。
Nature. 2020 Feb;578(7793):E1-E4. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1920-x. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
6
Limited emission reductions from fuel subsidy removal except in energy-exporting regions.除非在能源出口地区,否则减少燃料补贴的排放有限。
Nature. 2018 Feb 7;554(7691):229-233. doi: 10.1038/nature25467.
7
Global emissions: New oil investments boost carbon lock-in.全球排放:新的石油投资加剧了碳锁定。
Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):43. doi: 10.1038/526043c.
8
CLIMATE CHANGE. Winning coalitions for climate policy.气候变化。气候政策的成功联盟。
Science. 2015 Sep 11;349(6253):1170-1. doi: 10.1126/science.aab1336.