Suppr超能文献

儿童及青少年糖尿病酮症酸中毒中两袋与一袋液体输注的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Two- versus one-bag fluid delivery in pediatric and adolescent diabetic ketoacidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Nasser Maya L, Nasr Joseph, Zalloum Reem B, Yap Nathanael Q E, Bourdakos Natalie E, Miangul Shahid, Betts Tara A, Nakanishi Hayato, Than Christian A, Jabbour Serge

机构信息

St George's University of London, London, UK.

University of Nicosia Medical School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.

出版信息

Clin Exp Pediatr. 2024 Oct;67(10):486-497. doi: 10.3345/cep.2023.01536. Epub 2024 Jun 27.

Abstract

Two rehydration protocols currently exist to treat diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in pediatric patients aged <21 years: the traditional "one-bag" system and the more recent "two-bag" system. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the newer two-bag system versus the well-established one-bag system. The CiNAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched from inception to June 2023 by 2 independent reviewers using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis framework. Eligible studies were those that reported participants <21 years of age who presented to the emergency room with a clinical diagnosis of DKA. This review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023427551). From the initial screening of 42 studies, 8 unique studies encompassing 583 patients met the eligibility criteria. The analysis yielded no significant intergroup differences in hypoglycemia (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-1.87; I2=3%) or mean glucose correction rate (mean difference [MD], 0.04 mg/ dL/hr; 95% CI, -13.10 to 13.17; I2=64%). The incidence of cerebral edema was as low (0.17%) across groups, with only one case reported in the one-bag group. Notably, the mean time to DKA resolution (MD, -3.24 h; 95% CI, -5.57 to -0.91; I2=0%) and mean response time for intravenous fluid changes (MD, -32.75 min; 95% CI, -43.21 to -22.29; I2=59%) was lower for the two-bag system. This meta- analysis presents preliminary evidence suggesting that the two-bag system may confer advantages over the one-bag system for selected patients. However, further studies with greater patient stratification based on DKA severity, fluid composition, and protocol are needed to draw definitive conclusions and elucidate the extent of these advantages.

摘要

目前有两种补液方案用于治疗21岁以下儿童糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA):传统的“一袋”系统和较新的“两袋”系统。本研究旨在评估较新的“两袋”系统与成熟的“一袋”系统相比的安全性和有效性。两名独立评审员使用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目框架,全面检索了从数据库建立到2023年6月的CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库。符合条件的研究是那些报告年龄小于21岁、因临床诊断为DKA而就诊于急诊室的参与者的研究。本综述已在PROSPERO(CRD42023427551)上进行了前瞻性注册。从最初对42项研究的筛选中,8项独特的研究(涉及583名患者)符合纳入标准。分析结果显示,两组在低血糖(优势比,0.61;95%置信区间[CI],0.20 - 1.87;I² = 3%)或平均血糖校正率(平均差值[MD],0.04 mg/dL/小时;95% CI,-13.10至13.17;I² = 64%)方面没有显著的组间差异。脑水肿的发生率在各组中都很低(0.17%),“一袋”组仅报告了1例。值得注意的是,“两袋”系统的DKA缓解平均时间(MD,-3.24小时;95% CI, -5.57至-0.91;I² = 0%)和静脉输液调整的平均反应时间(MD,-32.75分钟;95% CI, -43.21至-22.29;I² = 59%)更低。这项Meta分析提供了初步证据,表明“两袋”系统对于特定患者可能比“一袋”系统具有优势。然而,需要基于DKA严重程度、液体成分和方案进行更细致的患者分层的进一步研究,以得出明确结论并阐明这些优势的程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a7/11471920/95056c61b6cf/cep-2023-01536f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验