Suppr超能文献

炎症性肠病对高级治疗反应丧失的处理方法。

Approach to loss of response to advanced therapies in inflammatory bowel disease.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Eastern Health, Victoria, Box Hill 3128, Australia.

Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Victoria, Box Hill 3128, Australia.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jun 14;30(22):2902-2919. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i22.2902.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Remarkable progress over the last decade has equipped clinicians with many options in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Clinicians now have the unique opportunity to provide individualized treatment that can achieve and sustain remission in many patients. However, issues of primary non-response (PNR) and secondary loss of response (SLOR) to non-tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) therapies remains a common problem. Specific issues include the choice of optimization of therapy, identifying when dose optimization will recapture response, establishing optimal dose for escalation and when to switch therapy.

AIM

To explores the issues of PNR and SLOR to non-TNFi therapies.

METHODS

This review explores the current evidence and literature to elucidate management options in cases of PNR/SLOR. It will also explore potential predictors for response following SLOR/PNR to therapies including the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

RESULTS

In the setting of PNR and loss of response to alpha-beta7-integrin inhibitors and interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 inhibitors dose optimization is a reasonable option to capture response. For Janus kinase inhibitors dose optimization can be utilized to recapture response with loss of response.

CONCLUSION

The role of TDM in the setting of advanced non-TNFi therapies to identify patients who require dose optimization and as a predictor for clinical remission is not yet established and this remains an area that should be addressed in the future.

摘要

背景

过去十年的显著进展使临床医生在治疗炎症性肠病方面有了许多选择。临床医生现在有机会提供个体化治疗,可以使许多患者实现并维持缓解。然而,非肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)治疗的原发性无应答(PNR)和继发性应答丧失(SLOR)问题仍然是一个常见问题。具体问题包括选择优化治疗、确定何时优化剂量可以重新获得应答、确定升级的最佳剂量以及何时切换治疗。

目的

探讨非 TNFi 治疗的 PNR 和 SLOR 问题。

方法

本综述探讨了目前的证据和文献,以阐明 PNR/SLOR 情况下的管理选择。它还将探讨 SLOR/PNR 后对治疗的应答的潜在预测因素,包括治疗药物监测(TDM)的作用。

结果

在 PNR 和对 α-β7-整联蛋白抑制剂和白细胞介素(IL)-12 和 IL-23 抑制剂的应答丧失的情况下,优化剂量是捕获应答的合理选择。对于 Janus 激酶抑制剂,优化剂量可以重新获得应答,而应答丧失。

结论

在高级非 TNFi 治疗中,TDM 确定需要优化剂量的患者的作用以及作为临床缓解的预测因子尚未确定,这仍然是未来应该解决的一个领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/746e/11212715/a32142e05c0b/WJG-30-2902-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验